Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RobinHood

"daytraders" Blowing Up in Bear Markets

Recommended Posts

I've heard many times of daytraders who were raking in money during the late 90's bull but then went broke when the market topped in 2001.

 

So I guess they were buying the dips or the breakouts.

 

Even so, wouldn't they have had time to learn different market environments during a market correction before the top? it would only take a market correction of a week or more for them to experience a drawdown and learn to adapt no (since they are trading more frequently than a EOD breakout type of guy)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what it means that you have heard about this... from who? where? any reliable sources?

 

In the truest sense of the word, a 'day trader' in theory should be flexible enough to deal w/ any market conditions, but that is not always the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure what it means that you have heard about this... from who? where? any reliable sources?

 

In the truest sense of the word, a 'day trader' in theory should be flexible enough to deal w/ any market conditions, but that is not always the case.

I agree, most true daytraders I know that were in the markets back then did not get hurt. For most of them it was quite the opposite. A day trader cares about volatility and will trade in either direction. I believe that many of the professionals that did go broke were highly leveraged in positions longer than a day. The whole "it can't go lower, buy more" concept. However, most non-trading baby boomers I have met will use the word "daytrader" when talking about all the people that went broke. Maybe someone with more market experience (ie older ;)) can give some insight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read accounts of day traders who faded away and died.

 

Basically they had strategies that had worked well in the up froth and couldn't adapt.

 

Darwin didn't say "survival of the fittest", he actually said "survival of the most adaptable."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, if it takes you until BROKE to realize that your edge is no longer working...then you have a much deeper issue (like many traders do) :). From the stories I have heard it seems like the act of putting more money into losing positions is what killed most. If you were a daytrader that understood the concept of a stop (both position and daily) you should of been okay if not profited greatly from the volatility. Of course it also depended on your methodology and edge. However, going back to the original thought of this thread...I believe (someone please tell me if you know otherwise) that there was not an abnormal amount of professional daytraders that blew up around that time. Most of the people that did were over leveraged swing traders who didn't know when to let go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon there were a lot of people who quit their jobs and called themselves daytraders, but if a position was in the red, they'd just leave it overnight (or longer) until it was profitable. Basically no risk management, which might work temporarily in the middle of a raging bull market, but will kill you when it ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, if it takes you until BROKE to realize that your edge is no longer working...then you have a much deeper issue (like many traders do) :). From the stories I have heard it seems like the act of putting more money into losing positions is what killed most. If you were a daytrader that understood the concept of a stop (both position and daily) you should of been okay if not profited greatly from the volatility. Of course it also depended on your methodology and edge. However, going back to the original thought of this thread...I believe (someone please tell me if you know otherwise) that there was not an abnormal amount of professional daytraders that blew up around that time. Most of the people that did were over leveraged swing traders who didn't know when to let go.

 

 

i agree, we will all go in slumps. Cut back and work your way up the ladder again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've heard many times of daytraders who were raking in money during the late 90's bull but then went broke when the market topped in 2001.

 

So I guess they were buying the dips or the breakouts.

 

Even so, wouldn't they have had time to learn different market environments during a market correction before the top? it would only take a market correction of a week or more for them to experience a drawdown and learn to adapt no (since they are trading more frequently than a EOD breakout type of guy)?

 

The simple facts are that MOST retail traders (daytraders) don't have the skills or the account size necessary to adapt to a changing market. In Susana's thread "Looking to Enhance Current *working* Trading Methodology" (my post #30) I offer a couple of comments that might point you in the right direction (if thats what you are looking for).

 

Good luck

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good point 52A. The term daytrader is so loosely used, it's hard to distinguish what is being included in that description sometimes.

 

It is loosely used - what it refered to were the NASDAQ intra-day traders (screen traders) back in the tech boom - who some of them went boom and bust. People who knew nothing about the markets were lured into margin accounts to get in the game - this is typical behavior nearing a market top.

 

I even know a guy who has never traded in his life who took out a leveraged loan from the bank back in the summer and loaded up on mining stock mutual funds, you can guess what was the outcome.

 

This is my hypothesis, but I would say the 2008 crash is different in the sense that the day trader community of back then (all the hoards of prop shops etc.) don't really exist to the same extent. From what I read in the industry, the people blowing up in this crash are overnight 'position traders'...prop desk traders of wall street firms, hedge fund traders....who don't really engage that much in the intra-day thing, and were heavily into emerging markets, energy etc...

 

If anything I would say that the intra-day traders 'day traders' are somewhat protected from some of these outcomes that the position trader has to deal with, ie. not trapped into markets collapsing against themself.

 

I almost blew myself up, in Sept alone I was down -32.03% of my total equity. I got extremely greedy, I was never selling, the gains would pile up (oil) and I would just leave them, then of course comes the rude awakening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The simple facts are that MOST retail traders (daytraders) don't have the skills or the account size necessary to adapt to a changing market.

If you had said "that most beginers trying to make a go at trading fail because they dont have a solid edge" I would have agreed with you.

In my view, You cant call someone a retail trader..if they dont have the skills to be profitable i.e. they dont have an EDGE.

 

As for the account size, well thats too relative/personal and it depends on many variables to each person trying to make it as a Trader.

 

If you have an Edge and the right work ethics i.e. disciplin to stick to your edge and only your edge then account size does not have to be huge...again account size depends on many variables.. so I cant be specific.

All I can say is if you have a solid Edge and have enough confidence in that edge..as in you have spent screen time watching it and you have a proffessional attitude and work ethic you dont need a huge account.

 

Having the ability to stick to your edge is very important for a beginer trader that is making some consistant progress. It is an almost sure way to be consistant and at the same time allow your self the needed time to become a vetran trader. You allow your self the needed time to mature like a good bottle of wine. Unfortunately many dont have that kind of patience.

 

In contrast...

 

if you are just starting to trade ( newbe) and you are trading without any solid edge and you only have enough capital for a minimum futures account...and plan to earn an income from trading.....well let me just say all the best to you.

 

Thats like me walking into the Redskins practice and thinking I can keep up with these professional Footbal players, why?? because I was pretty good player in my school days.

 

 

 

Regards..

Edited by sep34

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.