Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

james_gsx

Emotions While Trading

Recommended Posts

Well I read the paper and I think I was probably right to feel something wasn't quite right about its conclusions. I'm not saying there is not interesting and valuable data there btw.

 

Here's the thing (the way I understand it). In a nutshell they asked people to record there mood using a mood test. (UWIST mood adjective test list). The huge leap is that in the conclusion they have made the assumption that peoples mood is in response to 'monetary gains and losses'. As far as I can see that was not tested for. Hell the sample where paper trading so the mood outcomes could hardly have been in response to monetary gains and losses could it? Or have I just mis understood the test.

 

There is also a strong argument that the samples mood at the end of the day (when results where actually recorded) are effected by performance rather than the other way round. I am not suggesting that is the case but the possibility should not be ignored. You could conclude that people that perform poorly have greater emotional response to there trading? It's a chicken and egg deal.

 

Guess I am just being picky (yeah again) but I think potentially good work is being tarnished here. I would expect more rigour from academics.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this was already covered but something occurred to me tonight.

 

I'm currently working at the casino as a croupier. We are often playing poker and all in all this week I lost half my weeks wages.

 

Anyway, I've noticed that the emotions I feel playing poker are much more intense than the emotions I feel trading. If I could quantify it then I would say a $4000 loss to me is the equivalent of a $150 loss in poker (estimated).

 

On the way home tonight, I first thought maybe its because poker is more personal (face to face), but now I'm quite sure that what was responsible for the difference in emotion was my competence.

 

I'm really not that great at poker, quite a noob. Whereas when I'm trading I will have pre-defined stops and much more experience to go on when placing trades. I am much more able to ascertain whether I was responsible for a loss or it was a "natural" loss due to market ebb and flow.

 

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure if this was already covered but something occurred to me tonight.

 

I'm currently working at the casino as a croupier. We are often playing poker and all in all this week I lost half my weeks wages.

 

Anyway, I've noticed that the emotions I feel playing poker are much more intense than the emotions I feel trading. If I could quantify it then I would say a $4000 loss to me is the equivalent of a $150 loss in poker (estimated).

 

On the way home tonight, I first thought maybe its because poker is more personal (face to face), but now I'm quite sure that what was responsible for the difference in emotion was my competence.

 

I'm really not that great at poker, quite a noob. Whereas when I'm trading I will have pre-defined stops and much more experience to go on when placing trades. I am much more able to ascertain whether I was responsible for a loss or it was a "natural" loss due to market ebb and flow.

 

 

Thoughts?

 

That is interesting because I have thought of the same thing, but I am more comfortable playing poker than I am trading and I am definitely newer at trading futures than poker. However, my max daily loss trading is the same as the amount I bring to play poker, so, I can't relate to the 4000 and 150 thing.

 

I do get affected by my emotions trading, where it is a battle to keep myself from getting out to early. But, in poker, I only feel elated when I win or pissed that I lost, but that is at the end of the hand. So, you are probably right because before I play poker, I practice until I play the odds as close to flawlessly as possible; therefore, I know for certain that win or lose I played perfect poker.

 

That would be akin to knowing your set ups perfectly and losing on a trade that you would take 1000 times out of 1000 if you saw it that many times and you care less until the end. I am really not there yet with trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I read the paper and I think I was probably right to feel something wasn't quite right about its conclusions. I'm not saying there is not interesting and valuable data there btw.

 

Here's the thing (the way I understand it). In a nutshell they asked people to record there mood using a mood test. (UWIST mood adjective test list). The huge leap is that in the conclusion they have made the assumption that peoples mood is in response to 'monetary gains and losses'. As far as I can see that was not tested for. Hell the sample where paper trading so the mood outcomes could hardly have been in response to monetary gains and losses could it? Or have I just mis understood the test.

 

There is also a strong argument that the samples mood at the end of the day (when results where actually recorded) are effected by performance rather than the other way round. I am not suggesting that is the case but the possibility should not be ignored. You could conclude that people that perform poorly have greater emotional response to there trading? It's a chicken and egg deal.

 

Guess I am just being picky (yeah again) but I think potentially good work is being tarnished here. I would expect more rigour from academics.

 

I agree. paper trading and the real thing are completely different animals. It's like saying you can perfectly describe the taste of orange juice by looking at a picture of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By jason.lee
      Does it mean that you are an expert just because you make a lot of profit? The amount of profit cannot be used to measure the value of a trader. Yes, you must be doing something right if you are making a frequent profit. However, that does not determine if you are an expert or not just by your profit. This is quite a common misunderstanding in the forex industry.
      Making a large profit is only one side of the forex market. Majority of forex traders tend to lose most of the time after they have experienced profit. But why?
      So many traders fall into a fantasy land where they make an endless amount of money at the beginning. Many beginner traders tend to gain profit at the start not knowing the importance of technical analysis of the market.
      The experts on the other hand who stayed became wealthy and stayed that way, continue gaining profit, are all knowledgeable when it comes to the basics. Experts have dialed many ways to control their minds to be set right to be a trader.
      Understanding of the market is a must know anyway. Expert traders wait patiently until the right opportunity comes. Opportunity comes to everyone.
      What differentiates the experts and the beginners is that experts know when the opportunity has come and knows to take advantage of it. Making profit by luck is possible, and yes luck is also very important. But can you profit with luck every time?
      How an expert trader is determined is not by how much the person gained, it’s about the precision and the frequency of results. Profit can’t be maintained by luck. It is maintained and is a result of precision and strategical execution. You shouldn’t worry because you’re not gaining any profit right now.
      You should be building your skill sets to be a better trader by experiencing many trading situations of losses and wins. If you invest in your time to improve, your results are guaranteed to increase more frequently and will become more stable.
  • Topics

  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.