Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

bertg

"specialists" and eminis

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Here I am trying to learn this and that in Technical Analysis, while I feel like there are some basic questions I must have answers to first (maybe putting the carriage in front of the horses).

 

I am at the beginning of my second of three Richard Ney books. Fascinating stuff.

 

Who, if anybody, marks up and down the price in E-minis, since there is supposedly no specialist trading with his accounts) interests involved? From the CME manual I read: "There are also products, such as the CME E-mini stock index contracts, that trade only electronically and never via open outcry."

 

Then, if I understand Tom Willams correctly, the cash market leads the futures. But in the S&P 500 "cash" market there are 'specialists,' so in the end is the ES marked up/down by their interests? Which leads me to this question: what does S&P "cash" mean? How does the S&P 500 "cash" value move up and down? It's the performance of the 'specalist-manipulated' stocks that make up the index right?

 

I would appreciate help from anybody on this. I know some of the folks in the VSA thread are familiar with Ney, Wyckoff, Willias writings and their answers would be appreciated.

 

Thank you,

Bert

 

P.S. The use of the word "specialist" is what I understand Ney's is: to describe the specialist on the exchange floor that has no regard for true supply & demand and marks the price up & down, sells short, etc., all with the purpose of putting money in his account(s).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bert,

The relationship between the cash and the futures is a fairly complex one. The "cash" simply means the $SPX index. Big hedge funds and Prop firms are able to buy and sell each and every stock in S&P 500 with huge computers and huge accounts, so in this way they can actually trade the index, or rather, the stocks within the index. Arbitrage traders look for imbalances between the cash index and the futures (full contract or emini) and they will buy the cheaper and sell the dearer. In this way, the cash and futures are always dancing close to each other and taking turns as to which one leads.

 

A further level of complexity involves the locals in the S&P full contract pit, who can and do buy and sell the eminis to square their positions when they get caught long or short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very interested to hear how you get on with Ney. I can't help wonder if there is more to 'uncover' in his books. I did Joel Pozens course a while back (he appears to have stopped running it now). Apparently it was Ney who taught him to trade.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.