Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jim2000

Writing Naked Calls

Recommended Posts

Writing anything naked is really risky. If you're interested in writing and receiving premium, then sell call spreads. You're hedged that way and the margin required is much less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Writing anything naked is really risky. If you're interested in writing and receiving premium, then sell call spreads. You're hedged that way and the margin required is much less.

 

I understand the risk that the stock could skyrocket up, you get assigned and have to buy the stock at e.g. 70 to sell it at 55, a loss of 1500 per contract. But who would be stupid enough to do that?

 

What do you think of this scenario?

 

When you sell a naked call you don't care which direction underlying goes. It goes down, that is great. It goes up, you buy the stock just below the strike price to cover. If price stays below strike at expiration, great. Then either sell stock or write covered call. At this point there are many strategies to employ.

 

Am I missing something?

 

Who would be foolish enough to not cover if the underlying was approaching the strike?

 

Any thoughts on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do see your point there...I guess a lot of people would prefer to sell options hedged with options so their not having to tie up all their margin in a few trades. Its a huge margin risk to calculate your returns on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do see your point there...I guess a lot of people would prefer to sell options hedged with options so their not having to tie up all their margin in a few trades. Its a huge margin risk to calculate your returns on.

 

Yeah, but it is almost a no lose trade. That is if you watch it carefully.

 

Also, on paper it's a huge margin risk, but in reality there is no risk, zero risk, because you will cover the call at, or just before the strike if needed, even just above strike is ok. If after buying the stock it starts to drop, just sell it at market

above the breakeven point.

 

You enter the trade receiving, not spending, cash.

It doesn't matter if the underlying goes up or down.

Even if it goes above the strike before you can act you have a cushion to

work with, the premium you received.

Sell a call near the expiration to avoid the need to watch it closely for 5 or

6 weeks.

You don't need to study charts to pick a good company, just look at the

options chains for different stocks until you find an option with

a high enough premium to make it worth the while. Probably at least $1

All you really need to do is be prepared to buy the stock, no problem

If it does go above the strike if the option is excercised that's ok because

chances are you will still be within your profit zone, if not and you take

a small loss, that will happen from time to time, but not often

 

Like I said before, a gap up before you buy the stock, or a gap down after buying the stock are the 2 risks to this trade.

 

Oh, this is all my opinion, not a recommendation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was an options market maker for many years and have seen writing naked calls done over time.

 

If the trader has some expertise then it works for a time and profits get re-invested and size increases until the day when an unexpected event happens and the trader goes bankrupt.

 

I've seen it happen over a dozen times in the last 20 years. A great example was on Comex Gold in the late 1980's. Look it up. They were smart rich guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was an options market maker for many years and have seen writing naked calls done over time.

 

If the trader has some expertise then it works for a time and profits get re-invested and size increases until the day when an unexpected event happens and the trader goes bankrupt.

 

I've seen it happen over a dozen times in the last 20 years. A great example was on Comex Gold in the late 1980's. Look it up. They were smart rich guys.

 

Thanks Momentom,

 

I appreciate your reply, and I will heed your words.

 

I'll look up Comex Gold and study that situation. I'm assuming these smart rich guys got cocky, greedy, and over leveraged.

 

Thanks again. I appreciate your perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Momentom,

 

I appreciate your reply, and I will heed your words.

 

I'll look up Comex Gold and study that situation. I'm assuming these smart rich guys got cocky, greedy, and over leveraged.

 

Thanks again. I appreciate your perspective.

 

You want to be in a liquid market as well. You need to be able to move the underlying or move the options quickly, or you can get caught. And overleveraging is very risky, but unlikely in stock options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll look up Comex Gold and study that situation. I'm assuming these smart rich guys got cocky, greedy, and over leveraged.

You don't have to look very far or be very cocky to lose when you write options, btw, all these talk of market manipulation below should be prefaced as "alleged". A lot of market makers will claim market manipulation when they lose, which they almost never do when they make money :

Options

Interactive Brokers Cries Foul

Liz Moyer, 07.06.07, 4:00 PM ET

 

For the second time since its public stock debut in May, derivatives trading giant Interactive Brokers Group says options market manipulation is weighing on its business.

 

The firm was hit with a $37 million loss in May because of manipulative trading activities on the German electronic stock market, it said in a regulatory filing late Thursday. News of the loss and its potential effect on second-quarter revenues sent shares of Interactive (nasdaq: IBKR - news - people ) down nearly 8% in heavy trading Friday.

 

Interactive Brokers says several other market makers were also affected by the trading, which is being investigated by German financial regulators, and that their losses are also believed to be "substantial."

 

The activity happened in shares of German company Altana (nyse: AAA - news - people ), which had declared a special dividend early in May to coincide with the sale of its pharmaceuticals division. On the ex-dividend date, 31 million shares, or about 44% of Altana's outstanding shares, crossed the electronic Xetra market. The price dropped 25%, pushing the price of the related options "into the money." Interactive Brokers, as a market maker for Altana, ended up on the wrong side of those trades, to the tune of $37 million.

 

Altana's shares recovered the next day, shooting up 64% after those who sold the previous day to avoid the taxes on the dividend payment bought up shares.

 

Interactive Brokers claims traders "unlawfully colluded" to manipulate the stock.

 

It's not the first time Interactive has claimed market manipulation is costing it money. In May, after its highly anticipated initial public offering, the firm announced a $25 million loss as a result of being on the wrong end of trades. The trading activity suggested some were taking advantage of non-public information in advance of major corporate announcements.

 

Several other options market making firms, including closely held Peak6 in Chicago and Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ) in New York, have complained that possible manipulation is cutting into revenues. There are a limited group of such firms, but they control about 44% of trading, according to Options Clearing Corp. As the name implies, options market makers arrange orderly trading in options between buyers and sellers. When a client goes to sell and there is a lack of buyers, the market maker puts his own firm's capital at risk to make the trade. When a customer wants to buy and there are no sellers, the market maker pulls from his own firm's inventory.

 

In recent months, there have been some days when demand for certain call options--a bet that the underlying stock is about to rise in price--overwhelmed supply, and Interactive Brokers had to meet the demand. That meant it was on the hook to lose if the stock shot up, which happened a few times during the first quarter, hence the $25 million shortfall.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You don't have to look very far or be very cocky to lose when you write options, btw, all these talk of market manipulation below should be prefaced as "alleged". A lot of market makers will claim market manipulation when they lose, which they almost never do when they make money :

 

Blaming someone else when things go poorly and taking full credit when things go well? Frankly I am shocked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.