Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jperl

Trading with Market Statistics XI. HUP

Recommended Posts

I decided to try Jerry's approach today and with anything like this I prefer to limit my risk before I am familiar with the method so I decided to try it on the Dow Mini Future (YMM8) with 2 contracts. I have attached two screenshots of my entry and exits and I would appreciate feedback from others who have been using this. The trade was profitable with +8.5 and +23.5 points so even if I did not do things as I should have it has not cost me a loss :)

 

 

 

Paul

YM1.jpg.c7c55ca998b25e6400cecd44a8ace796.jpg

YM2.jpg.59974ed0726e468fa7ab3f6f4b1173c2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I decided to try Jerry's approach today and with anything like this I prefer to limit my risk before I am familiar with the method so I decided to try it on the Dow Mini Future (YMM8) with 2 contracts. I have attached two screenshots of my entry and exits and I would appreciate feedback from others who have been using this. The trade was profitable with +8.5 and +23.5 points so even if I did not do things as I should have it has not cost me a loss :)

 

 

 

Paul

 

 

Good setups and good trades Paul. You've got the basics down correctly. Notice also that if you missed the trade at the VWAP you could have entered at the retrace back to the 1st Standard Deviation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good setups and good trades Paul. You've got the basics down correctly. Notice also that if you missed the trade at the VWAP you could have entered at the retrace back to the 1st Standard Deviation.

 

I did wonder about that Jerry so thanks for this.

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did wonder about that Jerry so thanks for this.

 

 

Paul

 

Also think about what you would have done if the trade at the VWAP had not gone your way. Would you have exited the trade at the PVP or done something else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

I would have exited at either the PVP line or 1st Standard Deviation away from entry whichever was nearer at the time. Is that how you would have played it ?

 

Also when you said that I could have entered at the retrace back to the 1st Standard Deviation, would you exit if the trade went against the position at the 2nd Standard Deviation ?

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have exited at either the PVP line or 1st Standard Deviation away from entry whichever was nearer at the time. Is that how you would have played it ?

 

That is what most traders would do and in my opinion leads to a slow bleed of your capital. To avoid that you have to have a complete change of thinking about stop losses. You might want to reread the thread on [thread=2189]"Scaling in and Risk Tolerance"[/thread] to get a different perspective.

 

Also when you said that I could have entered at the retrace back to the 1st Standard Deviation, would you exit if the trade went against the position at the 2nd Standard Deviation ?

 

Not sure I understand what you are asking. If you had entered at the 1st SD and the trade went to the 2nd SD then I would have exited at the 2nd SD for a profit. If I didn't exit at the 2nd SD, I would have not allowed the trade to become a loser. I would then have exited 1 tick below my short entry.

On the other hand if I entered at the 1st SD and the trade went immediately against me, I would have scaled in another contract at the VWAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

I have already read "Scaling in and Risk Tolerance" and will apply it when I am happy that I have the basics correct. Previously I have always used a volatility based position sizing strategy so that my risk is consistent for any trade I take. I noted your comment about only becoming consistently profitable when you started using scaling in your trading. There will be some adjustment for me on this as I am not able to use my previous approach to position sizing so a change in mindset is needed which I will work on.

 

Thanks for your replies as I am finding your comments of real use.

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jperl, would you agree that your trading-methodology works best if we have a trend(day) ?

 

If you have read all the threads then it should be just as successful on a non trending day as any other. On the non trending days it is more likely that the VWAP price will be close to that of the PVP price and on these days you would take a trade at 2SD with the aim of closing out at 1SD or at VWAP.

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jperl, would you agree that your trading-methodology works best if we have a trend(day) ?

 

You don't need a trend day for market statistics to "work". What ever the day is, market statistics will reveal it by the the shape of the volume distribution function. How you use this information will be different for different traders.

I've just given a few examples of how you might employ it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for a lovely discussion, Jperl. I find a lot of validity and usefulness to your methods. I do have one question, though. Since the skew of the volume distribution is such an important part of your analysis, why not use other methods for estimating it. Rather than rely on the position of the mode so much, one could use the median or better yet, compute it in the classical way as the third moment of the volume distribution. The reason I ask is that a lot of times in the markets we have the PVP but also another price with almost as much volume. Also, sometimes there are clusters of volume that don't neccessarily include the PVP but could also act as a HUP. The point I am trying to make is that the relative position of the PVP and the VWAP is not always a reasonable estimate for the actual volume distribution skew and I was wondering if you have looked into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for a lovely discussion, Jperl. I find a lot of validity and usefulness to your methods. I do have one question, though. Since the skew of the volume distribution is such an important part of your analysis, why not use other methods for estimating it. Rather than rely on the position of the mode so much, one could use the median or better yet, compute it in the classical way as the third moment of the volume distribution. The reason I ask is that a lot of times in the markets we have the PVP but also another price with almost as much volume. Also, sometimes there are clusters of volume that don't neccessarily include the PVP but could also act as a HUP. The point I am trying to make is that the relative position of the PVP and the VWAP is not always a reasonable estimate for the actual volume distribution skew and I was wondering if you have looked into it.

 

You are perfectly correct, that the exact definition of the skew requires a computation of the 3rd moment. The problem with it is the computation is very cpu intensive. I therefore settled for the approximate value due to Pearson as discussed in the skew tag. The advantage of this is you can visualize the skew just by looking at the volume histogram with the vwap superimposed. The problem is as you point out, when you have two large volume peaks, you don't quite know what the skew is. Nevertheless since you can visualize the volume peaks in relation to the VWAP you can approach the market with caution when this occurs.

 

As far as HUPs go, you are correct again that peaks in the volume distribution are HUPS. Which HUPS you wish to use in your trading is of course a function of your trading style. Keep in mind that HUPS are just that, hold up prices. They are places for you to be cautious as to what to expect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem with it is the computation is very cpu intensive.

First let me thank you for these amazing threads, being a newbie I find them very useful. Second I apologize for my poor English.

Now to the computation of the third central moment. I am not educated in statistics, so I needed to read a few articles in Wikipedia. So please correct me if I am wrong:

 

CM3 = sum(PROBi * (Pi - VWAP)^3),

where

i is going through all prices in range (i.e. all rows in Volume Distribution Function)

CM3 ... the 3rd Central Moment

PROBi = Vi / V ... ith price probability (Volume per ith price / Total Volume)

Pi ... ith price in the Vol. Dist. function

 

Then the Skew would be calculated as

Skew = CM3 / SD^3

 

If this is correct, the computation doesn't seem too CPU intensive to me. I programmed such a computation in AmiBroker and I plotted a line on a chart. The line is VWAP + (Skew * SD). Watching this line together with PVP-to-VWAP relation can be very useful. Now I don't have time to elaborate, but if somebody is interested I can write more later.

 

Ondrej

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First let me thank you for these amazing threads, being a newbie I find them very useful. Second I apologize for my poor English.

Now to the computation of the third central moment. I am not educated in statistics, so I needed to read a few articles in Wikipedia. So please correct me if I am wrong:

 

CM3 = sum(PROBi * (Pi - VWAP)^3),

where

i is going through all prices in range (i.e. all rows in Volume Distribution Function)

CM3 ... the 3rd Central Moment

PROBi = Vi / V ... ith price probability (Volume per ith price / Total Volume)

Pi ... ith price in the Vol. Dist. function

 

Then the Skew would be calculated as

Skew = CM3 / SD^3

 

If this is correct, the computation doesn't seem too CPU intensive to me. I programmed such a computation in AmiBroker and I plotted a line on a chart. The line is VWAP + (Skew * SD). Watching this line together with PVP-to-VWAP relation can be very useful. Now I don't have time to elaborate, but if somebody is interested I can write more later.

 

Ondrej

 

 

 

Can you post a screenshot...

Is this Skew different from (VWAP - PVP) / SD ? More beneficial?

 

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First let me thank you for these amazing threads, being a newbie I find them very useful. Second I apologize for my poor English.

Now to the computation of the third central moment. I am not educated in statistics, so I needed to read a few articles in Wikipedia. So please correct me if I am wrong:

 

CM3 = sum(PROBi * (Pi - VWAP)^3),

where

i is going through all prices in range (i.e. all rows in Volume Distribution Function)

CM3 ... the 3rd Central Moment

PROBi = Vi / V ... ith price probability (Volume per ith price / Total Volume)

Pi ... ith price in the Vol. Dist. function

 

Then the Skew would be calculated as

Skew = CM3 / SD^3

 

If this is correct, the computation doesn't seem too CPU intensive to me. I programmed such a computation in AmiBroker and I plotted a line on a chart. The line is VWAP + (Skew * SD). Watching this line together with PVP-to-VWAP relation can be very useful. Now I don't have time to elaborate, but if somebody is interested I can write more later.

 

Ondrej

 

Very good Ondrej. You have the skew computation properly weighted. What makes this computation cpu intensive is in real time you have to update the value of PROBi as you add more volume data. Should be okay for a fast machine.

Perhaps you can show us some charts with your skew computation drawn in along with the VWAP and PVP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I uploaded screenshots. These are 2min charts for ES for the last 3 business days, counting today. VWAP is the thick yellow line, PVP thick turquoise line, Skew Line (VWAP + Skew * SD) is the thin light blue line. The dark blue area is the area between the 1st SD's, the Value Area in terminology of MP.

If the Skew Line is above VWAP the skew is positive, below VWAP negative. The distance between the Skew Line and VWAP tells you how large is the skew compared to SD. To distinguish the two different methods to determine the skew, I will use terms Skew(PVP) and Skew(3CM).

 

While Skew(PVP) flips (or jumps), the Skew(3CM) is continuous. By the time Skew(PVP) flips the Skew(3CM) Line crosses VWAP, that means Skew(3CM) crosses zero. In other words, if the skew is positive and price action is above VWAP, Skew(PVP) rises while Skew(3CM) decreases. By the time the Skew(PVP) flips, the Skew(VWAP) crosses zero.

Hence the first use of the Skew(3CM) is to warn you before the PVP flip. Another use, surprisingly, :) is to determine the real statistical skew. The Skew(PVP) has the greatest absolute value right before the flip. That might lead you into some bad trades. If you look at Skew(3CM) you will recognize that the real skew is very small.

As you can see from the charts, it looks like the Skew Line is a minor HUP itself. But I have been watching this only for a couple of days, so I don't want to make any conclusions yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I uploaded screenshots. These are 2min charts for ES for the last 3 business days, counting today. VWAP is the thick yellow line, PVP thick turquoise line, Skew Line (VWAP + Skew * SD) is the thin light blue line. The dark blue area is the area between the 1st SD's, the Value Area in terminology of MP.

If the Skew Line is above VWAP the skew is positive, below VWAP negative. The distance between the Skew Line and VWAP tells you how large is the skew compared to SD. To distinguish the two different methods to determine the skew, I will use terms Skew(PVP) and Skew(3CM).

 

While Skew(PVP) flips (or jumps), the Skew(3CM) is continuous. By the time Skew(PVP) flips the Skew(3CM) Line crosses VWAP, that means Skew(3CM) crosses zero. In other words, if the skew is positive and price action is above VWAP, Skew(PVP) rises while Skew(3CM) decreases. By the time the Skew(PVP) flips, the Skew(VWAP) crosses zero.

Hence the first use of the Skew(3CM) is to warn you before the PVP flip. Another use, surprisingly, :) is to determine the real statistical skew. The Skew(PVP) has the greatest absolute value right before the flip. That might lead you into some bad trades. If you look at Skew(3CM) you will recognize that the real skew is very small.

As you can see from the charts, it looks like the Skew Line is a minor HUP itself. But I have been watching this only for a couple of days, so I don't want to make any conclusions yet.

 

Nice job Ondrej. It looks as if using the exact definition of the skew can provide some useful trading information not available in the approximate Pearson evaluation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very good Ondrej. You have the skew computation properly weighted. What makes this computation cpu intensive is in real time you have to update the value of PROBi as you add more volume data. Should be okay for a fast machine.

Perhaps you can show us some charts with your skew computation drawn in along with the VWAP and PVP.

 

I am not sure but I would guess there is a non iterative way of commuting PROBi. (i.e. not so processor intensive). I'm on vacation with friends and another glass of wine beckons so probably not the time (and in no fit state) to give it thought!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jerry, I wonder how do you determine the exact PVP level. In fact, I started to dig in the skew stuff only because I was unable to determine an accurate PVP position. With my data feed I don't get volume per price but only volume per bar (i.e. per time unit). To approximately determine the volume per price I take the volume per bar and divide it by the number of prices the bar crosses to obtain the volume unit which I add to every price level that the bar crosses. Now that was an awful sentence but I hope you know what I mean. The problem is that this is an averaging process and every averaging process smooths peaks. To get an accurate volume per price I would need to run the computation on tick database and that would be unusable in real time. On ES I observed that the data base with sufficient accuracy would be 50 tick or less data. That was too detailed for my computer to handle in real time so I started to look for another way to determine the skew. The comptutation of the 3rd central moment is an averaging process itself so it is not so sensitive to the averaging of volume per price. Still, the PVP, as a major HUP, is a significant level and whatever the Skew(3CM) is, you don't want to take your trades across the PVP because it can block the desired price movement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not sure but I would guess there is a non iterative way of commuting PROBi. (i.e. not so processor intensive). I'm on vacation with friends and another glass of wine beckons so probably not the time (and in no fit state) to give it thought!
Being drunk myself I guess I can reply to your idea. I guess that there is no non-iterative way to determine PROBi. But there are two advices I can give you. I am not a programmer, but programming the Jerry's indicator I realized I don't need the re-computation of everything every second. The only thing you need to update continuously is the volume at price. Then, if you know what the V-A-P is, you can recalculate the VWAP, SD's and the Skew say only once per one or two minutes. If you don't want to caculate at all you can use the range middle to determine the skew. I think the range middle to VWAP relation is more appropriate than the PVP to VWAP relation. One can ask himself a question: Where would be the VWAP if there was a symetric distribution? One answer would be: At the PVP, yet another answer could be: In the range middle. Think of the interpretation of the terms or phenomena to make your own conclusion. Combining both approaches would be the best way to approach the real skew without computation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jerry, I wonder how do you determine the exact PVP level. In fact, I started to dig in the skew stuff only because I was unable to determine an accurate PVP position. With my data feed I don't get volume per price but only volume per bar (i.e. per time unit). To approximately determine the volume per price I take the volume per bar and divide it by the number of prices the bar crosses to obtain the volume unit which I add to every price level that the bar crosses. Now that was an awful sentence but I hope you know what I mean. The problem is that this is an averaging process and every averaging process smooths peaks. To get an accurate volume per price I would need to run the computation on tick database and that would be unusable in real time. On ES I observed that the data base with sufficient accuracy would be 50 tick or less data. That was too detailed for my computer to handle in real time so I started to look for another way to determine the skew. The comptutation of the 3rd central moment is an averaging process itself so it is not so sensitive to the averaging of volume per price. Still, the PVP, as a major HUP, is a significant level and whatever the Skew(3CM) is, you don't want to take your trades across the PVP because it can block the desired price movement.

 

I use ensign software for my charts. The volume histogram with the PVP is one of the studies provided. As you point out, for an exact value of the PVP you would need to compute the volume distribution for every tick. Ensign doesn't do this but uses the volume for each bar distributed equally among the tick increments for the range of the bar. This of course is an approximation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use ensign software for my charts. The volume histogram with the PVP is one of the studies provided. As you point out, for an exact value of the PVP you would need to compute the volume distribution for every tick. Ensign doesn't do this but uses the volume for each bar distributed equally among the tick increments for the range of the bar. This of course is an approximation.
So the Ensign computes the volume distribution the same way as I do. on 7/15 I compared the PVP, VWAP and 1st SD's computations on ES from differnt time frames (i.e. bar intervals). Here is the result (All for RTH 9:30 - 16:15, 1st SD's are named VAH and VAL):

 

5 min graph: VAH 1227.03, VAL 1210.78, VWAP 1218.91, PVP 1225.00

1 min graph: VAH 1227.07, VAL 1210.65, VWAP 1218.86, PVP 1218.75

100 tick graph: VAH 1227.06, VAL 1210.62, VWAP 1218.84, PVP 1223.25

50 tick graph: VAH 1227.06, VAL 1210.63, VWAP 1218.84, PVP 1223.0

20 tick and 10 tick graphs computations resulted in the same values as the 50 tick graph. 1 tick graph was too much for my computer to handle.

 

You can see that while VWAP and SD's being averaged values are not much sensitive to the calculation base interval. Yet PVP being a peak level is very sensitive to any kind of averaging. For ES 50 tick data provide the base detailed enough for an accurate calculation.

I realized I am unable to determine dailly PVP from 1 minute database and that brought me to alternative ways of calculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So the Ensign computes the volume distribution the same way as I do. on 7/15 I compared the PVP, VWAP and 1st SD's computations on ES from differnt time frames (i.e. bar intervals). Here is the result (All for RTH 9:30 - 16:15, 1st SD's are named VAH and VAL):

 

5 min graph: VAH 1227.03, VAL 1210.78, VWAP 1218.91, PVP 1225.00

1 min graph: VAH 1227.07, VAL 1210.65, VWAP 1218.86, PVP 1218.75

100 tick graph: VAH 1227.06, VAL 1210.62, VWAP 1218.84, PVP 1223.25

50 tick graph: VAH 1227.06, VAL 1210.63, VWAP 1218.84, PVP 1223.0

20 tick and 10 tick graphs computations resulted in the same values as the 50 tick graph. 1 tick graph was too much for my computer to handle.

 

You can see that while VWAP and SD's being averaged values are not much sensitive to the calculation base interval. Yet PVP being a peak level is very sensitive to any kind of averaging. For ES 50 tick data provide the base detailed enough for an accurate calculation.

I realized I am unable to determine dailly PVP from 1 minute database and that brought me to alternative ways of calculation.

 

The difference you are seeing in the PVP is most likely due to two peaks with almost the same volume. This will cause the PVP values to jump around from one time frame to another. This is an example where a visual of the total histogram would help you out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking at precise vs averaged for a while now. On the whole the smoothed (average) seems to offer better trading opportunities. Hard to tell really, I certainly don't have enough data. I guess at some stage I will need to ditch one as it does introduce ambiguity. Of course an alternative would be to only trade when they are in agreement.

 

Heres an interesting thing. Normally its the tick precise chart that jumps around but today it was the 2 minute (I guess just how the cookie crumbled).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date : 7th April 2020. FX Update – April 7 – A wee bit more Risk. Trading Leveraged Products is risky AUDUSD & GBPUSD, H1 The commodity currencies outperformed some more, as did many developing-world currencies amid a backdrop of rising stock and commodity markets. Equity markets are amid day two of a rally pinned on tentative signs that the global coronavirus infection and mortality rates might be near to peaking. The Fed’s decision to finance new “payroll protection” loans has also bolstered the US economic response plans. AUDUSD has rallied 1.7% in printing a one-week high at 0.6192, while AUDJPY has rallied by 1.4% in making a high at 67.38. The Aussie dollar is now up 3% from last Friday’s closing levels. The Kiwi and Canadian dollars are also up. USDCAD has dropped to an eight-day low at 1.4011. The Dollar, Yen and, to a lesser degree, the Swiss Franc, have continued to underperform most other currencies. The narrow trade-weighted USDIndex has declined by 0.6% in pegging a five-day low at 100.79, while EURUSD concurrently lifted by 0.7% in making a five-day high, at 1.0876. The pair is up by just over 1% from its Monday lows. The combination of risk-on positioning in markets and the Fed’s aggressive dollar liquidity provisions, which forms part of a crisis-era level of monetary accommodation, have been bearish tonic for the Dollar. Dollar underperformance saw USDJPY dip back under 109.00, though the Yen itself trader softer against most other currencies as its safe-haven premium is whittled down. Sterling dipped on the news that PM Johnson was moved to ICU and had received oxygen, although Downing Street stated that he was still conscience and that Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab will lead the UK government as long as Johnson is incapacitated. From lows of 1.2162 earlier, a weaker USD, has Cable rally over 170 pips to 1.2335. Next resistance is R2 and the upper Bollinger band around 1.2375, 1.2400 and then R3 at 1.2420. Support sits at 1.2300 and the Daily Pivot Point, a 50.0 Fibonacci level and 200hr moving average at 1.2250. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Stuart Cowell Head Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CloseOption Broker is currently trying in completing the project binary options (Financial Betting Platform) with a special platform and due to the simplicity Platform and having good performance they will attract and absorb soon many clients and partners. This Broker accepts CryptoCurrencies, Paypal, PerfectMoney & Credit Cards Deposits! Minimum Deposit: 5$ CloseOption - 2.400$ Weekly Tournament - 1st Place win 750$ (first 10 places win money) Read CloseOption Broker Review - https://1binaryoptions.eu/review/close-option/
    • PocketOption Broker Announces: Entering payments through stable cryptocurrency (stablecoin) PAX and Tether Add funds to your Pocket Option trading account, and withdraw from your account using two popular "stablecoins": PAX or Tether. The funds are automatically credited after receiving the required number of confirmations in the blockchain. Please note that we do not accept payments through Smart Contracts. About stable cryptocurrencies (stablecoins) Both Paxos Standard (PAX) and Tether (USDT) combine the stability of the US Dollar with the efficiency of blockchain technology. Like any other cryptocurrency, funds can be moved instantly, anywhere in the world, at any time of any day. Unlike other cryptocurrencies, PAX and Tether are stable and covered 1: 1 by the Dollar, which includes traditional currency and cash equivalents, etc. Thus, the funds are carefully protected, audited and regulated. Pocket Option Broker USA Customers Welcome | Binary Options No Deposit Bonus! - https://binaryoptionsfree.eu/review/pocket-option/
    • Date : 6th April 2020. Events to Look Out For Next WeekIt’s a holiday shortened week ahead as most markets will be closed on Friday for the Easter holidays, however the novel coronavirus remains the focal point. The rapid upswing in market volatility seen in March should continue in April as governments, central banks, households and businesses further adapt to the ongoing pandemic and uncertain outlook. Hence this will be another week of increased attention to the data which will incorporate more of the impacts of the global shutdowns and will help start to quantify the severity of the economic impacts amid still very uncertain times.Monday – 06 April 2020   OPEC Meeting (USOIL, GMT 19:00) – Azerbaijan’s energy ministry said that a meeting of the OPEC+ group of oil producers is planned for April 6 and will be held as a video conference. Tuesday – 07 April 2020 Interest Rate Decision and Monetary Policy Statement (AUD, GMT 04:30) – Positioning in 30-day interbank cash rate futures this week implied a 60% chance for the RBA to cut its benchmark interest rate to zero from 0.25% at the upcoming policy meeting, which is up from odds of 31% for such a move that were being discounted just over a week ago. However in the March RBA minutes, they provided colour around the 25bp rate cut and the adoption of QE but they made clear that there is no appetite for negative interest rates. JOLTS Job Openings (USD, GMT 14:00) – JOLTS define Job Openings as all positions that have not been filled on the last business day of the month. February’s JOLTS job openings is expected to fall slightly at 6.476M, following the 6.963M in January. Ivey PMI (CAD, GMT 15:00) – A survey of purchasing managers, the Index provides an overview of the state of business conditions in the country. API weekly Crude Oil Stocks (USOIL, GMT 20:30) Wednesday – 08 April 2020   EIA weekly Crude Oil Stocks Change (USOIL, GMT 14:30) FOMC Minutes (USD, GMT 18:00) – The FOMC Minutes report provides the FOMC Members’ opinions regarding the US economic outlook and any views regarding future rate hikes. In the last FOMC statement, on March 15, the FOMC slashed rates 100 bps to 0% – 0.25% in an emergency move, getting ahead of the curve. Thursday – 09 April 2020   ECB Monetary Policy Meeting Accounts (EUR, GMT 11:30) – The ECB Monetary Policy Meeting Accounts provide information with regards to the policymakers’ rationale behind their decisions. At the same time, in the last meeting, ECB announced a EUR 750 bln pandemic emergency program (PEPP) and introduced new QE measures worth EUR 120 bln and additional loan programs, while they left rates unchanged at the March policy meeting. Producer Price Index (USD, GMT 12:30) – The Headline PPI is expected to decline to a -0.2% March PPI headline with a 0.2% increase in the core index. The continued energy price pull-back through the month likely weighed on the headline. Employment Change (CAD, GMT 12:30) – Employment change is seen spiking to 10.0k in the number of employed people in March, compared to the spike at 30.3k in February. The unemployment rate is expected to remain at 5.6%. Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index (USD, GMT 14:00) – The preliminary April Michigan sentiment reading is forecast at 95, up from the 89.1 in March. Friday – 10 April 2020   Consumer Price Index (CNY, GMT 01:30) – The March’s Chinese CPI is expected to remain unchanged on a monthly and yearly basis. Consumer Price Index and Core (USD, GMT 12:30) – The headline CPI has been estimated to a -0.2% March headline CPI drop with a 0.2% core price increase, following respective February readings of 0.1% and 0.2%. As with PPI, the headline inflation figures will be depressed well into 2020 from the OPEC price war, though the core figures will face divergent pressures that are partly downward due to diminished demand with COVID-19, but upward due to supply shortages that may prompt some erratic swings. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Bitcoin (BTC) Drops To $6,828 After A Sudden Price Spike To $7,283 Key Resistance Zones: $10,000, $11,000, $12,000 Key Support Zones: $7, 000, $6, 000, $5,000 BTC/USD Long-term Trend: Bearish On March 2, there was a price spike as Bitcoin reached a high of $7,283.50. The bulls could not sustain the upward move as Bitcoin fell to $6,828. The bears are defending intensively the $7,000 overhead resistance. BTC is now fluctuating above $6,800. The bears will further sink BTC if the bulls fail to move up. Bitcoin may fall to the low of the breakout level of $6,400. However, if this level also cracks, the market will further fall to the next support. BTC/USD – Daily Chart Daily Chart Indicators Reading: Bitcoin is above 60% range of the daily stochastic. This is given the recent price spike which tested the resistance line of the descending channel. However, if price breaks and closes above the resistance line, there will be a change in the trend. BTC will resume an uptrend. BTC/USD Medium-term Trend: Bullish Yesterday, BTC was making an upward move to retest the $7,000 resistance. The price has earlier moved up to $6,800 before the commencement of price spike. The market moved above the resistance level but could not sustain above $7,000 because of the selling pressure. BTC/USD 4-hour Chart Indicators Reading The Relative Strength Index has risen to level 66. It indicates that BTC is in the uptrend zone and above the centerline 50. The 21-day and 50-day SMAs are sloping upward indicating the upward move. General Outlook for Bitcoin (BTC) Yesterday, Bitcoin rose to $7,283 in a price spike. The bulls could not sustain the upward move because of the presence of sellers at the price level. BTC dropped to a low of $6,800. The price has since been fluctuating above that level. Instrument: BTC/USD Order: Sell Entry price: $6,784.00 Stop: $6,850.00 Target: $6,584.00   Source: https://learn2.trade 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.