Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Bam-Bam

Help with Stops

Recommended Posts

I have been trading for a number of years with a limited amount of success. One problem that I have been unable to solve is that the market is incredibly consistent at taking out my stops on spikes against me before moving in the direction of my trade. As a result, I get stopped out of many positions that would have otherwise been profitable.

 

This consistently occurs with any instrument I have tried to trade, either long or short. For a year or so, I decided that the market was out to get me personally. ;) I've outgrown that bit of narcissism, yet the problem still remains.

 

I've tried loosening my stops a bit. The spikes that take me out only grow accordingly. I've tried--sad to admit--trading without stops. Then, the moves against me continue against me rather than being spikes. I've tried using a set percentage as a stop. I've tried being on the trade side of Support and Resistance. I've tried being on the opposite side of Support and Resistance. I've tried alot of approaches, none of which seem to work.

 

Please note the attached chart as an example. It is a chart of the morning session of ES for Oct 23, 07. The posted chart has 1-minute bars to show that the spike that hit my stop was the very top of the move against me. I entered the trade based on a consolidation on a 233 tick chart.

 

1. ES shorted based on pennant consolidation

2. Stop placed 0.25 above 0.5 Resistance Level

3. Stop hit on highest spike of retracement for loss

4. Trade re-entered @ 1520.25 for nice gain

 

Any recommendations y'all can offer would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thank you,

Bam-Bam

_______________

 

* Not a newbie, I just trade like one.

5aa70e16a6469_ESTrade23-10-07.thumb.JPG.ffba373c3258d1e001aef83776404d90.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few things I notice are...

 

The volume on the bar you got stopped out on while it was testing a mid-pivot was really low...Good chance the market won't be breaking that level on no volume/no demand.

 

The entry maybe should have been closer to the pivot level and/or the stop should have been a touch higher above the pivot.

 

I trade like a noob and am noob cause my emotions aren't where they need to be yet...but I do believe I will get there in due time. I'm a year into the market so I have time to lose my a$$ and learn. :o

 

Nice trade on the 2nd shot it seems though, so congrats on that. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is only one answer to your dilemma. That is don't use stops! I know that is absolute heresy to some but it doesn't mean you don't stop out loosing positions. Actually a useful paradigm shift can come out of this. You use your tools to tell you whether things are playing out as anticipated and if they are not you close or reverse. People seem to put all their effort and levels of sophistication into there entries and use really crude tools and concepts for exits.

 

What might be a bit less radical and so more use to you is use a volatility based stop (ATR or chandelier springs to mind).

 

Finally you could look at winning setups and maximum adverse excursions you usually get a sweet spot (or two) where to increase your winners a small amount you have to widen your stops considerably.

 

Final thought, if you do use fixed stops (either based on market structure, a point amount or some sort of technical like ATR) they will take you out of good positions as well as bad ones. Thats the price you pay for having protection.

 

Seems to me its far from a newbie question!

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My recommendation would be to never EVER place a stop above a non market generated pivot level. Projected Support and resistance like R1 and S2 are just that, projected.

 

Until a market CREATES a previous swing high/low it doesn't take much effort (money) for the level to be touched.

 

I highlighted in blue where a more proper stop could have been placed. In red are others throughout the day if you were trading to the downside.

 

Professional operators will not put capital to work unless they see an opportunity or have an objective to fulfill, keep this is mind when looking for places to put stops.

 

Stops places a couple ticks above/below a prior swing high or low, above a consolidation area or just below.above a retracement are ideal.

 

In my opinion stops placed above below projected support or resistance such as pivot calculations, fibbonacci levels, market profile value areas, etc. etc. are less than ideal.

ES_stops.thumb.jpg.09cf251af784ec86ce0b84a967693ca9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bam-Bam,

 

Here is a link to good webinar on stop placement.

http://www.cbot.com/cbot/pub/cont_detail/0,3206,1084+42256,00.html

 

I would start a stop only analysis journal, and examine about 30 trades or so.

It would go something like this.

 

Chart

Direction

Enter because

Stop placed

Stop option 1 (pivot high)

Stop option 2 (bar high)

Stop option 3 (Last WRB closing lower, high)

 

Then look at the percent of times that each stop was hit.

Trading is about discovering who you are and studing yourself as you participate in the market.

 

Good Luck

Rajiv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing with stops based on market structure is you often get a 'poke' above or below the swing high/swing low as the market tests or backs and fills. Seems to me waiting for a close above a market high/low to take you out would keep you in a lot more trades. I wonder if anyone uses that particular approach?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i totally second MrPauls comment. Also, one thing Paul had taught me...stops on close. Wait until the candle closes to see if it closes beyond your stop so that way you don't get squeezed out on it. but, stops based on market generated info is the way to go, not projected info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a way to go....and a pretty good unambiguous way. I'd not go as far as saying its the way :)

 

Let me introduce another (particularly fine imo) possibility is market geometry - for example if you are buying an up sloping trend channel you would stop on a close below the the main up sloping trend line(1-3 line). The beauty of this is that it provides a handy target too (2-4 line). This is still market generated (as it uses two successive swing lows) and projected (as its a sloping line drawn through these).

 

As an aside I would highly recommend Tim Morges (no affliation) commentaries on his stop placement and movement (hes over at medianline.com) I find them absolutely fascinating I'm not sure if the archives are still available but worth seeking out. I have them all printed out and use to read and re-read them. They just seemed very accessible to me, it was like reading a good novel as he would talk a trade through from start to finish. I'm a little loath to make recommendations but its quality stuff.

 

He uses market swings for initial stops and trailing, lines for targets (on the whole). It is the trailing that is particularly interesting as he talks through his thought process' as the trade develops. When to move a stop to a newly formed swing high swing low, comments on price action that he's noticing etc.

 

Trade management is certainly one of the keys to this whole game and personally I can buy in to the exits (stops and targets) are more important than entries point of view.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always worth having an hard 'emergency' stop well outside the market. Protection against things like equipment failure or, god forbid, some sort of personal catastrophe. Thats a different matter of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for all the recommendations. My first step is to follow Ranj's suggestions and record why I set a particular stop and if it was successful. I am also going back through my trade records to record the maximum incursion against my positions, both successful and unsuccessful.

 

A very good point for me is to trigger a stop only if the bar closes above my stop level. That would have saved me on a good many trades. I can't remember how many times I've had one trade go through that kicks my stop before the market moves back toward my entry.

 

Thanks again,

 

Bam-Bam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cable,

 

Thanks for the input. On the one hand I agree that the stop in question may have been a little tight. On the other hand, I had good rationale for selecting it. It was based on 1) market generated resistance-- pivot level, and 2) ~2.00 pt. "standard" hard stop on ES--it was actually 1.75 pt.

 

In the past, I've tried loosening my stops. Then I am usually taken out on larger spikes that reverse as soon as my stop kicks, so the only benefit I receive from larger stops are usually larger loses that are proportionally more frustrating.

 

Blowfish's recommendation to use a volatility based method makes a lot of sense to me. That way one can customize the stop level to the setup and timeframe that one is trading based on the ATR.

 

In my case, risk management in the sense of stop placement has been more detrimental to my trading success than entry decisions. It's a matter of trying to do the right thing but just not doing it right.

 

 

Thank you for the input,

 

Bam-Bam

 

* Not a newbie, I just trade like one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should place your stops MANY ticks above/below the prior swing point.

 

There are different scenarios that may occur:

 

1) The swing point isn't breached and your position is safe

 

2) Stop running occurs and your stop should be safe unless it's placed 1-2 ticks above/below the swing point.

 

3) Your stop is hit and that means the breakout might be for real.

 

I agree that waiting for the interval to close might be the better option...but we just never know how far it'll close...that's the problem.

 

In extremely volatile days, waiting for the close may turn out very costly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.