Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Kelly Criterion

Recommended Posts

This thread is an extension of the Martingale thread but deserves its own place. The Kelly Criterion is a forumula that maximizes growth of account. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy and isn't recommended -- but the concept is valid and one can use this as a starting point and take down the risk. It is worthy of discussion.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterion

-----------

Basically, it computes a % of how much of your portfolio you should risk on the next trade given your long-run expected win rate (W) and the expected dollars won for a win vs dollars lost for a loss ®.

 

Drawdowns are problematic using this formula -- but growth of capital is awesome if your win rate is there.

 

-----------

K = W - (1-W)/R

 

K = Fraction of Capital for Next Trade

 

W = Historical Win Ratio (Wins/Total Trials)

 

R = Winning Payoff Rate

 

-------

For example, say a coin pays 2:1 with 50-50 chance of heads or tails. Then ...

 

K = .5 - (1 - .5)/2 = .5 - .25 = .25.

 

Kelly indicates the optimal fixed-fraction bet is 25%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If i understand some of the implications of the kelly criterion correctly, one possible problem is that a string of losses of high probability trades could lead to big setbacks. The risk of blowing out ones account wouldn't be so bad though, since less money would be risked after every losing trade.

 

Of course if everything works out well, it is just the opposite.

 

Assuming market conditions stay the same and trade execution wouldn't change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got into this type of stuff last year when I was thinking about throwing caution to the wind. From what I remember I thought "optimal r" (i think thats what it was called?) was better than kelly.

 

This thread on elite though seemed to have the best money management strategy if you knew what your systems expectancy was:

 

System Development with acrary

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=33654

 

Here is a text with all the replies stripped out. Someday I would like to get through this but its pretty hard. Easily the best thing I've ever read on elite though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lets say you have a 10K account and according to Kelly you have to risk 40% of your account. How do you do that ?:crap:

 

1/ Kelly number is based on huge amount of statistically consistent data - what most traders do not have from their trading - that is the first reason why it is so dangerous.

 

2/ Anyway, let us assume that you could have. Markets are changing (they are not like telephone line noise). What you get is based on past results, current trade "Kelly" is unknown variable, fluctuating wildly based on market conditions.

 

3/ There are also technical issues. Kelly works if you can bet infinite fraction but you can bet only in increments of one contract. If you bet that portion of your account at once and lose just few times in a row you might end up with too little money for your risk or margin to open even one contract. That is why in this direct way it is only useful for perfectly optimized diversified portfolios (~30 uncorrelated securities or more, various strategies, timeframes, etc.). Anyway, portfolio theory will be very long story.

 

4/ Then there are psychological issues. After 3 loses in a row you would lose about 80% of your account - can you stand it? With $10,000 account you can forget using Kelly this way.

 

There are other issues but what I found useful for average trader like me is using Kelly relative to maximum drawdown. Let's say you have $10,000 and think you are a consistent trader in changing market conditions. You start with single contract and make at least 100 trades. From that you calculate Kelly ratio and your maximum drawdown. Let's say your max DD is 3,000 and your Kelly is 40%. Then your risk could be 0.4 * 2,000 = $800 per trade. If you were risking $200 per trade you could trade 4 contracts.

 

For average speculator there are simpler, safer and more effective MM methods so you do not need to worry about Kelly too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Kelly is an absolute classic.

 

However, because:

 

a/ the payoffs in trading cannot be precisely assessed

b/ the psychological factors will interfere in a trader's execution of "otherwise winning strategy" - i.e. he will capitulate under a severe drawdown pressure

 

half Kelly or less is advised

 

Kelly is better for trading multiple - and uncorrelated - markets, then you just divide Kelly ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tell me ...

 

In the beginning try to find a position sizing method which fits your psychology. It is important also later but in the beginning you maybe do not know so well that can happen and how will you react.

So think about money management not only from math point of view, but what is more important from psychological point of view. I found trading one contract quite difficult from psychological point of you, since I either took only a small profit from large move (fear) or loss when I wanted a bigger profit (greed). Two or three contracts and scaling out helped me a lot.

 

And regarding formulas, I spent long time testing various very complex position sizing methods and found three most useful: Fixed Ratio, Fixed Fraction and Larry Williams method. I should point out here that I daytrade single market, so it is different it you trade portfolio of 30 stocks with some automated strategy etc.

 

The last one (Larry's) is which I like the most:

contract traded = (account balance * risk percent) / largest loss

You set the risk percent based on your knowledge, skills and risk tolerance, usually between 5% and 15%. I like it because it takes into account two subjective numbers: your personality (risk percent) and your system (largest loss). You might hear to risk 1-2%, it is even safer and I also advise to start from that.

 

Traders never bust because they risked too little, they bust because they risked too much!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Kelly is an absolute classic.

 

However, because:

 

a/ the payoffs in trading cannot be precisely assessed

b/ the psychological factors will interfere in a trader's execution of "otherwise winning strategy" - i.e. he will capitulate under a severe drawdown pressure

 

half Kelly or less is advised

 

Kelly is better for trading multiple - and uncorrelated - markets, then you just divide Kelly ...

 

Please elaborate.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...you divide your method's Kelly fraction by the number of markets you trade, so if your method's Kelly is say 20% and you trade 10 markets with that method - you allocate 2% risk per position = per market

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.