Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

'ATR is highly correlated to volatility & tends to be much more normally distributed'

Recommended Posts

http://www.activetradermag.com/strategy.htm

 

This is interesting article discussing how ATR as a proxy for volatility can be useful.

 

Why is this meaningful?

 

Well, normal distributions have well-defined statistical qualities. This topic feels relevant to jperls recent series of excellent topics.

 

I will present one idea using this information with hope of stimulating some useful conversation on this topic with regard to intraday futures trade set-ups. I am still developing this idea but wanted to present the article first to get others to think about the implications of this concept in concert with their own trading methods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You see one of your trade set-ups and you are considering entering a futures position.

 

How do you know if the ‘location’ of this trade allows plenty of room for profit potential?

 

This is an idea for trying to think about location (for entering with good location and therefore implying good profit potential) that uses ATR and VWAP. The goal is simply to create some discussion around this topic. This is certainly not intended to be a lesson.

 

I like to think of VWAP as a starting point for price action. In my opinion, price action relative to VWAP is some of the most consistently important price action of the trading day.

 

What are some of the basic things the market can do if starting near VWAP:

 

1. The market can cling to the VWAP level – forming a ‘balance’ – a coil.

2. The market can push away from VWAP with momentum and sustained trending action.

3. The market can attempt to go one direction away from VWAP with momentum and strong conviction -- but then reverse (a classic trap) and shoot the other direction.

4. Finally, the market may just not care about VWAP and oscillate with no real respect for this level.

 

I want to focus on the cases where price is in the vicinity of VWAP and you get some kind of an entry signal that you are considering taking as a discretionary trader (entry signals are not really the thrust of this thread).

 

In my view, any well-defined pattern around VWAP or a simple ‘momentum-based push’ away from VWAP may be a good time to take an entry signal. You can never know with certainty which of the above cases will occur but if you can determine a reward point that the market may trade to, you may find it to be worthwhile to get a trade on for the mere potential reward of having the right read.

 

The first attached chart is a situation where I believe the market is ‘in balance’ – price is consolidating near the VWAP price and meandering without conviction. Quantitatively, you could call it a ‘Low ADX’ consolidation-- pattern-wise, you could say the it is congesting because you are able to draw ‘converging trendlines’ (ie, you can draw a triangle type of formation/consolidation).

 

Now let’s think backwards, if you think you know how far the market could carry if it does start to move directionally (break the ‘balance’), then you can probably figure out a location that is ok to enter as it leaves you enough room to take a position and make a nice profit. Then you can take trades whenever your personally-defined trades set-up in this ‘execution zone’…

 

Chart 2 shows the same market coil as Chart 1 but I have added the ‘target’ levels. This is where I am estimating price as eventually moving to over the course of the day. This is simply an ATR function off of VWAP. If VWAP is ‘fair value’ – and the market is ‘in balance (low ADX triangle) – then estimating the future movement off of the existing ‘balancing’ is pretty flawed. A market that is ‘trending’ and a market ‘in balance’ are opposites. Determining a trend off of a period of balance is going to be difficult to make work. But I see this type of thing on the vast majority of trading days – some kind of balancing followed by price auctioning to a new level.

 

A Rashke principle is that of a markets tendency to ‘trend’ in the ‘afternoon session’ (after lunch) – when volume picks up as institutions tend to trade more heavily in the afternoon. Why don’t we use this trending action of the previous afternoon as a guideline for todays trending action? This makes more sense then trying to use the morning congestion because of the difference in afternoon and morning trading. And let’s use Average True Range to estimate such.

 

Chart 3 shows how the market moved after breaking away from its coil/balance on Friday

 

Chart 4 shows how this level has worked over last 6 days.

 

The formula I used was simply to add and subtract 5 ATR’s from VWAP with ATR calculated using the previous days final 3 hours of trading (180 2-minute bars average ATR). I used 5 because it is a Fibonnacci number and I always start with those. This is a 2-minute chart and 5 ATR's off a 2-minute chart seems to be hit a lot. In more extreme days -- 8 ATR's (next fib number up) might be inserted. This is just a guideline for determining potential reward based on previous days ATR. This is not supposed to be any holy grail type of discovery -- its just a way to visualize where price could trade to when you see one of your set-ups -- a time when it is often tough to see the forest for the trees.

5aa70df6f3733_082407SPsBalance.thumb.png.df41b0e02b57a015e22776d672cd0156.png

5aa70df706ba3_082407WithTargetPrices.thumb.png.ef5242c33cd2680b997df06ac570a435.png

5aa70df70e15d_082407WithResult.thumb.png.7ab696ec5424388a78fd085a1139fa44.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.