Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

derek2209

EasyLanguage Convolution Indicator by John F. Ehlers

Recommended Posts

Hi Traderslaboratory

 

In John F Ehlers Book " Cycle-Analytics-for-Traders "

The EasyLanguage code to compute the Convolution indicator is given in

Code Listing 13-1.

EasyLanguage Code to Compute and Display Convolution

 

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

the line in the book and below is incomplete

i.e.

<<< If Filt[intPortion(.5*N)] < Filt Convolution[N] = (1 + (ExpValue Blank >>>

 

To get Indicator to run inserted the line below

 

<<< If (IntPortion(.5*N))>Filt then Convolution[N]=(1+ExpValue(N)); >>>

Could someone please correct this effort

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

 

See attached pdf " Ehlers Convolution Indicator" for the original code

 

Thank you in advance

Derek

 

The EasyLanguage code to compute the Convolution 
indicator is given in Code Listing 13-1. 
Code Listing 13-1.
EasyLanguage
Code to Compute
and Display
Convolution
{ Convolution Indicator 
(c) 2013 John F. Ehlers 

} 
Inputs: 
ShortestPeriod(40), 
LongestPeriod(80); 
Vars: 
alpha1(0), 
HP(0), 
a1(0), 
b1(0), 
c1(0), 
c2(0), 
c3(0), 
Filt(0), 
N(0), 
II(0), 
X(0), 
Y(0), 
Sx(0), 
Sy(0), 
Sxx(0), 
Syy(0), 
Sxy(0), 
Color1(0), 
Color2(0), 
Color3(0); 
Arrays: 

Corr[48](0), 
Slope[48](0), 
Convolution[48](0); 
//HighPass filter cyclic component 
alpha1 = (Cosine(1.414*360 / Longe 
HP = (1 - alpha1 / 2)* 
(1 - alpha1 / 2)* 
(Close - 2*Close[1] + Close[2]) + 
(1 - alpha1)*HP[1] - (1 - alpha1)* 
(1 - alpha1)*HP[2]; 
//Smooth with a Super Smoother Fil 
a1 = expvalue(-1.414*3.14159 / Sho
b1 = 2*a1*Cosine(1.414*180 / Short
c2 = b1;
c3 = -a1*a1;
c1 = 1 - c2 - c3;
Filt = c1*
(HP + HP[1]) / 2 + c2*Filt[1] + c3

For N = 1 to 48 Begin 
Sx = 0; 
Sy = 0; 
Sxx = 0; 
Syy = 0; 
Sxy = 0; 
For II = 1 to N Begin
X = Filt[iI - 1];
Y = Filt[N - II];
Sx = Sx + X;
Sy = Sy + Y;
Sxx = Sxx + X*X;
Sxy = Sxy + X*Y;
Syy = Syy + Y*Y; 
End; 
If (N*Sxx - Sx*Sx)*
(N*Syy - Sy*Sy) > 0 Then Corr[N] =
(N*Syy - Sy*Sy)); 
Slope[N] = 1; 

{//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

In John  F Ehlers Book  " Cycle-Analytics-for-Traders"
The EasyLanguage code to compute the Convolution indicator is given in Code Listing 13-1.

the line in the book and below is incomplete
i.e.
<<<  If Filt[intPortion(.5*N)] < Filt Convolution[N] = (1 + (ExpValue  >>>

To get Indicator to run   substitued the line below

<<<  If (IntPortion(.5*N))>Filt then Convolution[N]=(1+ExpValue(N));  >>>
Could someone please correct this effort

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////}


If (IntPortion(.5*N))>Filt then Convolution[N]=(1+ExpValue(N));
End;
//Plot as a Heatmap
For N = 3 to 48 Begin 
If Slope[N] > 0 Then Begin

Color1 = 255*Convolution[N];
Color2 = 0; 
End; 
If Slope[N] < 0 Then Begin
Color1 = 0;
Color2 = 255*Convolution[N]; 
End; 
Color3 = 0; 
If N = 2 Then Plot2[4]
(2, “S2”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 3 Then Plot3[4]
(3, “S3”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 4 Then Plot4[4]
(4, “S4”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 5 Then Plot5[4]
(5, “S5”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 6 Then Plot6[4]
(6, “S6”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 7 Then Plot7[4]
(7, “S7”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 8 Then Plot8[4]
(8, “S8”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 9 Then Plot9[4]
(9, “S9”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Colo 
If N = 10 Then Plot10[4]
(10, “S10”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 11 Then Plot11[4]
(11, “S11”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 12 Then Plot12[4]

(12, “S12”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 13 Then Plot13[4] 
(13, “S13”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 14 Then Plot14[4] 
(14, “S14”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 15 Then Plot15[4] 
(15, “S15”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 16 Then Plot16[4] 
(16, “S16”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 17 Then Plot17[4] 
(17, “S17”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 18 Then Plot18[4] 
(18, “S18”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 19 Then Plot19[4] 
(19, “S19”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 20 Then Plot20[4] 
(20, “S20”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 21 Then Plot21[4] 
(21, “S21”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 22 Then Plot22[4] 
(22, “S22”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 23 Then Plot23[4] 
(23, “S23”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 24 Then Plot24[4] 
(24, “S24”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 25 Then Plot25[4] 
(25, “S25”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 26 Then Plot26[4] 
(26, “S26”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 

If N = 27 Then Plot27[4] 
(27, “S27”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 28 Then Plot28[4] 
(28, “S28”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 29 Then Plot29[4] 
(29, “S29”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 30 Then Plot30[4] 
(30, “S30”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 31 Then Plot31[4] 
(31, “S31”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 32 Then Plot32[4] 
(32, “S32”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 33 Then Plot33[4] 
(33, “S33”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 34 Then Plot34[4] 
(34, “S34”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 35 Then Plot35[4] 
(35, “S35”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 36 Then Plot36[4] 
(36, “S36”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 37 Then Plot37[4] 
(37, “S37”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 38 Then Plot38[4] 
(38, “S38”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 39 Then Plot39[4] 
(39, “S39”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 40 Then Plot40[4] 
(40, “S40”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 41 Then Plot41[4] 

(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 42 Then Plot42[4] 
(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 43 Then Plot43[4] 
(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 44 Then Plot44[4] 
( 4, “S 4”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 45 Then Plot45[4] 
(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 46 Then Plot46[4] 
(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 47 Then Plot47[4] 
(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
If N = 48 Then Plot48[4] 
(4 , “S4 ”, RGB(Color1, Color2, Co 
End; 

Ehlers Convolution.pdf

Edited by derek2209

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Derek,

 

I think you may have to buy the book. The PDF you posted is cropped on the right after ~30 chars so who knows what else may be missing...

 

What happens when you run your

"If (IntPortion(.5*N))>Filt then Convolution[N]=(1+ExpValue(N));"

version?

'Filt' is a function call. You'd have to have the code for that to get this working...

 

Have you found complete .pla code for this? Your missing code and the Filt function might be an easy translation

 

Here is a contact who may be able to get you all the original code... He no longer uses TS so emphasis on may be

John Ehlers code links

 

hth

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.