Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.


,,,just Sayin...

Recommended Posts

re:  " I hope you’re long and that you know exactly when to get short..."

Most posters tend to use about 90% more words than they need .  It's called hedging -just in case someone actually understands what they are saying and they end up being wrong.

anyways ...



Re:  “Fuck off”

Most posters tend to use about 90% more words than they need .   Not mitsubishi  :)




it vent viral




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posting is expensive so I’ll keep this short

A narrative of LIES took the markets up. Now, a narrative of LIES is taking it down

 ... bluntly, there’s the ‘dominant concern’ narrative - which is usually fake - and then there’s the real reasons for major moves.

... and btw my dear Bill Gates this NOT the “once in a century pathogen.” ... It’s actually just a gd really bad cold.  I’m just sayin’





... meanwhile back at the panderamic ranch



ps the accuracy of viral tests is even worse than this portrays ... just ask an objective pathologist.




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

re: stocks.  Imo,we have a long ways to go down before we get to ‘value’ .  “Even at the March 23rd low...the Wilshire 5000-to-GDP ratio was at 101.38 percent, the 73rd percentile”   No place to be shopping for 'value'

Yet, with all the fake money flooding in, the stock mkt could still soar.  But - up is not really up.  The long ‘bull of the last dacade + was actually ‘bull’sht.  Bullsht = steady injections of more fiat, taking on cash flow dependent corporate debt to finance ‘supply reducing’ buybacks,  malinvestments galore, capital DESTRUCTION - all clouded by a steady stream of FALSE msm narratives and fake numbers - from top numbers (ie GDP, etc.) all the way down to individual corp reports and reporting. ... ie Any ‘bull’ action now is in the  category of obese elephant bull sht...

And as I have been posting for years, we can’t use dollars as a measure anymore.  ie  Up is not really up


and using dollars as a measure is getting worse and worse.  ‘money’ not ‘working’ anymore. ..



... ” Another day, another trillion dollars.”


re:  “all clouded by a steady stream of FALSE narratives. “  Yes, sweetheart the same thing has been happening in the covidity lockdown ... a steady stream of FALSE narratives  https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/peoples-skepticism-about-covid-19-is-the-fault-of-the-lying-mass-media-91216ad7fcf3  ... I just chuckle now anytime I hear any US press comment on/ criticise Russia or Chinese ‘disinformation’ .  Imo, China’s ‘Police State’ is currently only a tiny click or two worse than our ‘Pharm State’.  

Re:  trading. 

It’s been a wild wonderful wide range last six + weeks  to trade.  I have been preparing for it a long time and still didn’t capture as much as possible... for one thing, didn't increase/balance sizing for  those outlier bounces as robustly as I should have, etc ... but still it’s been amazing.  First signs starting to show up that ‘volatility’ is slowing down ... will deal with that by up sizing all positions appropriately.

I’m no longer ‘trading’ fx.  I’m now speculating in fx.  ... gradually scaling into a pretty good sized dollar short...  do you make a distinction btwn ‘trading’ and ‘speculating’?


btw atlas shrugged about a “secret coin”.... I’m just sayin’ :)


later... maybe

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

to all 3 of you... god bless


As a trader, I have to consider alternatives.  Keeping “anything can happen” near the front of my mind is part of the game   ... that this perfect setup and trigger may not work this time... or the next n times, etc etc.  It’s now automatic... and when it droops, that’s a sure sign I’m the source of increasing risks. 

In the MSM news narratives I also have to consider alternatives too.  It’s now almost automatic.  So some just sayin alt thoughts...

Alt: corvidity.  At best - Policy made in panics is generally AWFULLY bad policy.  At worst - policy unveiled in panics has dark motives.  At best or at worst - panic policy hurts the many and helps the few. Instead of https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/14/50-headlines-welcome-to-the-new-normal/ , JR says it better - so...




Alt:  Bailing everything and everyone out is in effect backstopping nothing and no one.  Backstopping/Bailing everything and everyone out can never be complete... some are bailed  out better than others.  Alt thought - It  might have been better to just stop... simply “No one should be bailed out!”  period.  "...nobody should be bailed out. No company should be bailed out. No individuals should be bailed out. Everybody needs to deal with the consequences of their own actions."  Let’s see what the  current social fabric of this world is really made of.... and btw alt: we are NOT ‘all in this together’.   Let’s see what happens when a large percentage of  businesses fail, re-org or be taken over and re-orgd.



Alt:  Are the FAANGs really the best buy trade on the whole planet right now?  Really?  They have as much or more operational and revenue fragility than most of the companies they are outperforming ... hm.  And they actually have very little self control ... rapidly decreasing adaptability...

  (if it hasn’t been taken down .... run at 1.75 speed...)

Edited by zdo

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

to all 2 of you





All was not well in wholesale dollar markets at least five months before the virus hit, so the problem is more complex than a simple return to normality when the virus passes. Furthermore, the authorities trying to keep the economy from imploding are out of their depth, so much so that individuals in the private sector are gradually realising it as well. Financial risk has escalated considerably, which has one effect: bankers will use every opportunity to reduce the size of their balance sheets. The authorities will struggle to get banks to hold fast, let alone distribute subsidies to producers and consumers alike.





ps:  newsflash you heard it here first - covid19 has already mutated... the copies they are using to engineer 'vaccines' are useless... reminds me of 1976 (profitable to a few) swine flu vaccine fraud...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Lockdown LIES = something like a Milgram / Asch /Fow Chi: 'experiment' on the masses

Subject: Why must I press the shock button?

Fow Chi: We must flatten the curve and raise the line.

Zap followed by whimpers.

Subject: The patient sounds like this is hurting him.

Asch: Some must suffer today so that some old people can die of the flu, next year.

Next higher voltage switch, zap, followed by a scream for mercy.

Subject: I don’t know how much more the patient can take.

Fow Chi: What part of flatten the curve and raise the line don’t you understand?

Subject: I don’t understand how torturing this system helps anything.

Chi :  How dare you! I am Doctor Fow Chi, M.D., D.O., S.T.A.T.I.S.T., Ph.D. I, and I alone know what is best.

Voltage up, zap, blood curdling scream.

Subject: I still don’t understand.

Milgram : And oh by the way you are not zapping just one guy but almost every business owner in America.

Subject: I won’t!

Asch: You will, because I am wearing a white lab coat!

Subject: Do you understand economics? Economic policy? Economic history even?

Chi: Of course not! All irrelevant to flattening the curve and raising the line.

Subject: I don’t know …

Asch: Here is a bunch of money and laws that say you do not have to pay your bills.

Voltage up. Zap. A low moan, then silence.









more "At best - Policy made in panics is generally AWFULLY bad policy.  At worst - policy unveiled in panics has dark motives.  At best or at worst - panic policy hurts the many and helps the few. "





Stick around ... for ... as the world turns... for... as your fiat literally disintegrates... vaporizes...



ya'll have fun now

Edited by zdo

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

let’s circle back around to the corvidity a moment

whatif - far more humans have been exposed to covid than they report... far more ‘recoveries’ and  failures to ‘infect’ than they report

whatif - ‘every’ death is now a ‘covid’ death ie the statistics are now just plain ole fake

whatif - from the very beginning,  vaccine science is bad science  whatif the consensus models of viruses are just plain wrong

whatif - you lap up what ‘fauci’ say

back to $


where I’m having fun is watching a $ whatif - “John Exter’s inverse pyramid shows how the world’s credit obligations are all supported on a diminishingly small apex of gold.”

where I’m having fun is connecting and reconnecting with my old network of traders instead of posting in forums.  Many of them are more sucked into the narratives than they used to be...  a huge mistake in my view.   Many of them are dazed and confused - but nowhere near as traumatized and frozen as the boys and girls in this laboratory...  just saying. 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

On so many levels “Separation is bondage.”

... meanwhile all the peeps are voluntarily and docilely ‘separating’

Do you question the lockdown?  Probably not. 

But if you do - here’s a quick tutorial on how


and I'm not swallowing this one hook, line, and sinker -but - if you do question the lockdown - is  worthy of 1.75 speed consideration


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion on the plandemic
From the intelligence and biologic evidence I’ve seen, this was an engineered corona.   The prime panic was at high levels because when it got out / was deployed, they had almost no guidance on how many people it could kill and damage or how fast it could spread.  Turns out it’s not a ‘plague’ worthy of a lockdown.  It’s probably a prelude to future engineered plagues that will wipe out billions... but this one is just an ‘on the serious side’ corona that has no more effect on healthy ‘cells’ than any other corona.  

The lockdown is a concurrent dark operation with NO basis in facts.  All its basis is in fears.  

The public is now desperate for sensible policymakers who have the courage to ignore the panic and rely on facts. ... and. finally, we see some signs that is happening with this good advice -“take some Clorox internally” :)
From the beginning - and certainly now - the way to handle this plandemic =
> Strictly protect the vulnerable, the aged, the health compromised.
> like with other viruses, self-isolate the mildly sick, ... and 
> leave everything else  WIDE open ( maybe “ with some prudent large-group precautions”. )

ims = In My ‘statistics’  ie  ims is imo based on my 'statistics' ie ims is 'fun with statistics' ... just sayin'

“early WHO reports noted that 80 percent of all cases were mild”
 “more recent studies show a far more widespread rate of infection and lower rate of serious illness.”
ims, even with the lockdowns, the rates of exposure were/ are EXTREMELY high.  ‘Infection” rates are / were also extremely high,  However most infections are quickly handled by healthy immune systems with only minor or no symptoms expressed.  Ie  instead of 80 % cases mild, ims it’s more like 97% cases are mild... like every human gets 5 ~ 6 coronas a year and never even knows about most of them.

"current antibody research now estimates the fatality rate is likely 0.1 to 0.2 percent"...  using ims from the paragragh above,  the fatality rate is nowhere near that high ... for dam sure nowhere near the 3,4,5,6  % numbers put out by agencies like the  World Globalist Health Organization, the ‘gates’ vaccine industry,  and parroted like “Russia Russia Russian “ by the captured MSM.  Btw, the death counts on the tv screens are so skewed it’s unbelievable.  For weeks and weeks, every death was counted as a covid death... don’t get me started on false narratives... *

ims Herd Immunity as currently (mis)understood is bad science.  Ims, herd immunity through exposure to corona viruses is not what happens.   “Vital population immunity” does not come from herds with antibodies.  “Vital population immunity” comes from populations with healthy cells.  Ie on the  dis - ease front the whole dam world has it upside down ... ie all but a tiny percentage of human are hypnotized about ‘pharma’ 

ims, many are being set up for death by the medical facilities sudden exclusions of everything else except C19 cases.  On another hand it makes systemantic  ‘sense’ to classify every intake as c19 because the govt  reimbursements are 112% highly for C19 than standard cases... meanwhile, many who need immediate and ongoing care are no longer getting it and will soon ‘cost more’ then die.  Ims, this is only a symbol of the much hUger scale of destruction the second order effects of the lockdown will bring... on th e current trajectory much more than hospital patients will soon ‘cost more’ then die.



* if you want to keep going - a quote from part one of the link I posted yesterday or ?  from https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/20/coronavirus-lockdown-and-what-you-are-not-being-told-part-2/   ... ie in his statistics.  


...Effectively a small group of policy decision makers have placed an estimated 3.5 billion people under house arrest. It is only possible for them to do so with our consent. Consent is carefully cultivated by controlling the information we are given.

For the vast majority their only source of information is the corporate mainstream media (MSM) and the public announcements of the State. This article is written, as ever, in the hope people will do their own research and make up their own minds.

We are going to look at the evidence which strongly suggests the State and the MSM, adhering to a globalist agenda, have colluded to mislead the public into believing the COVID 19 (C19) threat is far greater than it actually is...

Gotta go...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me get this straight now - through the ‘bailout’ laws the govt is forcing ‘citi sins’ to take out more credit and then the govt is sending that borrowed money to ‘citi sins’ / borrowers so they can service payments to lenders...  that sounds like ‘’dead money” and ‘zoombobway’ all rolled up into one.  Oh well, at least the SP500 is a safe haven...

... meanwhile back at the pandemic - unless we have a personal connection we rarely pay any mind to the multitudes of ‘mysterious’ deaths where the medical agents can only make a short list of possible causes and no autopsy is performed.  Well those days are over, folks.  Going forward there are no more mysterious deaths.  The cause of all those deaths has been found - it was Covid all along.  Just look at the statistics.


Re the  lockdowns - imo vast crowds are still giving consideration to the govts who cried wolf.

Proper procedure  would have  been (and the way to right the course right now today - unless they have other agendas) =

>'Lockdown' the vulnerable.  The vulnerable are those with serious existing conditions, are on a cocktail of toxic prescriptions, and those exposed to significant loads or environmental and airborne toxins.

>Protect the vulnerable.  Ie provide ‘clean’, managed  contact with those who serve the vulnerable. 

>Forget testing... current  tests can’t tell the difference between viruses and cellular ‘products’.  PCR,etc. was never designed to test for viruses - especially a single type of virus. 

>Open - and I mean OPEN - everything else.   Fuck 'governors, czars, etc pretending to provide 'security' by  bringing it on in stages (to preserve their control freak nanny state fantasies.)


... just sayin'

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


IMS (see above ‘in my statistics’ post) , no matter where or how it originated, C19 was in existence long and spread all over the planet well before the initial wuhan ‘outbreak’  .... cases going back into early Nov. in the US, etc etc ??

And again, IMS, yes C19 has spinoffs/mutations all over the world (reminder - send a note to bill gates)   

A  buddy  who finds these ‘just sayin’ posts amusing (‘sicko’ 😄 ) asked what I meant by “environmental and airborne toxins”.   I told him for starters to google

petroleum processing wuhan

petroleum processing northern Italy

petroleum processing Louisiana

petroleum processing metro New York

most ‘livers’ can struggle along with these loads...  different story for those already sick and poisoned...  high case rates in those areas not a coincidence




I also told him that he must join all his peers in the lab and “ live in fear “... or all his tubes would be taken down like https://summit.news/2020/04/28/youtube-censors-viral-video-of-doctors-criticizing-stay-at-home-order/

... and that he was safe and could trust the ‘authorities’ ...



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember posting in a TL Gold thread that the way gold was being discussed was in terms of fundamentals, narratives, valuations, and technicals of gold itself but that it had nothing to do with that... that instead if you were trading gold instruments you were actually trading dollars (and its other fiat fx correlates)  without acknowledging or considering the fundamentals,  narratives, valuations, and technicals of the dollar.  ie Why bother analyzing gold when it's the dollar that needs to be analyzed?   The same process is now reaching  ‘commentable’ extremes (again) in stocks.  ‘Commentable’ - because fundamentals, narratives, valuations, and technicals can be completely ignored (temporarily )  .  Unless you are Charlie Munger , you are free to see stock indexes as a pure measure of the ‘dilution’ of the dollar.   Ie gold, stocks (and gold stocks ;) )  are currently much better ‘FX’ trades than are cross FX trades 

Meanwhile out in the populace ...



The Fed is robbing the middle class once again...

For the third time in 20 years, the Fed has targeted the middle class for the benefit of the wealthy.

Don't believe Fed lies. Its bailout of risky debt including junk bonds helps investors traders, not employees.

Once again, the Fed Punishes Prudence.

The Fed will deploy more than $1.45 trillion in support of investors in leveraged assets—more than double the size of the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program, and over $7,000 for each working-age American. That includes $750 billion to purchase recently downgraded junk bonds and bond exchange-traded funds—an unprecedented intervention in the private credit markets.

Pumping trillions of dollars into corporate credit and even high-yield debt will further distort markets already shaped by a decade of easy-money policies. This is no abstract concern. The result will be an acceleration of two economy-wide transfers of wealth: from the middle class to the affluent and from the cautious to the reckless.







There Are No Temporary Measures, Just Permanent Lies

Under guise of virus support, the Fed Will Buy Junk Bonds, Lend to States to the tune of an additional $2.3 trillion in additional aid.

 Dear Jerome Powell, please tell the truth. This is not virus support, it's stock market support.

This new junk bond "tool" is now permanent.

 Always remember, There Are No Temporary Measures, Just Permanent Lies.





Meanwhile back at the ranch...












In his 1976 film masterpiece, Network, Paddy Chayefsky’s unhinged newsman, Howard Beale, broadcasts this message to his audience on national television—


“So, you listen to me. Listen to me! Television is not the truth. Television’s a god-damned amusement park. Television is a circus, a carnival, a traveling troupe of acrobats, storytellers, dancers, singers, jugglers, sideshow freaks, lion tamers, and football players. We’re in the boredom-killing business… We deal in illusions, man. None of it is true! But you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creeds. We’re all you know. You’re beginning to believe the illusions we’re spinning here. You’re beginning to think that the tube is reality and that your own lives are unreal. You do whatever the tube tells you. You dress like the tube, you eat like the tube, you raise your children like the tube. You even think like the tube. This is mass madness. You maniacs. In God’s name, you people are the real thing. We are the illusion.”

Television, in the main, does not attempt to impart knowledge. It strives to give the viewer the impression that he knows something. There is a difference.

Knowledge, once established, is independent of the viewer. Whereas the impression of knowing is a feeling, a conviction, a belief the viewer holds, after he has watched moving images on a screen. THIS is what the addicted viewer prefers. He wants no part of knowledge.

Therefore: a short circuit occurs in his mind.





I am 'ahppy' to have made it through this whole post without once mentioning the tsunami loss of your rights... could I be intuiting that you don't care?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

From one lab worker to another...


In the absence of the two vital experiments I’ve described in this article, all you’re left with, concerning a single “COVID-19” pandemic and a single new cause, are: anecdote, rumor, gossip, conjecture, speculation, bad science, and lies.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish you could read faster


I wish you could listen faster too... try 2X speed... and btw

...paraphrasing Bill Gates = “ you better listen bitches ... we can catch you outside and  kill you  with invisible stuff”


goes to show how accurate prediction (and all the cred that comes with it) is easy  when you know what is going to happen  ... takes me back to the first post I did in here on C19... link ... JR’s dated old observations about how viruses are NOT good bioweapons but are excellent cover for actual bioweapons...


supplemental reading


that link was about this https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/what-covid-revealed-about-internet/610549/  ...which if nothing else is a perfect example of covid1984 double speak

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Library of Mistakes”







“Mistakes ... period.”


I’m requesting links to ANY trajectory model of C1984 that has been correct.  I’m not just talking about the  Gates WHO bought up influencers / bad scientists like Neil Ferguson - who’s , btw, never had a model that was  right in his whole life.  Found this (most will scream bias, but I’m thinking ... she who screams loudest...) https://www.globalresearch.ca/models-tests-consequences/5711194

I’m also requesting links to authorities’ assumptions that have been correct about C1984...



Stockholm Syndrome:

A condition in which hostages develop a psychological alliance with their captors during captivity.


Lockdown Stockholm Syndrome:

A psychological state of mind that causes its sufferers to come to love seeing their economies and liberties being destroyed, whilst simultaneously being incapable of accepting that Sweden kept its society going without resorting to such measures.



 and while you’re at it please  post links to optimal authorities’ policies built on these models and assumptions- in terms of deaths, costs, and liberties.  Here is a sample - NOT! https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/after-cuomo-clintons-and-newsom-call-army-contact-tracers-monitor-citizens-dc-posts-job





The same questions could be asked about the ‘medical community’s’ (aka now as the ‘technocratic medical police state’)  reactions to C1984. For why, see




... back in the library of mistakes...


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 3/14/2020 at 10:40 AM, landorra said:

I see that the insults contest has not stopped yet. Sad to see this forums decaying so rapidly. :(


whiney little bitch

Edited by mitsubishi

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/14/2020 at 10:40 AM, landorra said:

I see that the insults contest has not stopped yet. Sad to see this forums decaying so rapidly. :(

It's decayed because you and all the other pigeon english speaking clowns here have nothing to say worth listening to.

Dont stroke your own ego by deluding your self that it is somehow my fucking fault.

If this was a community of real intellectual debate you wouldn't be here and I wouldn't be tolerated for 2 seconds

The fact that you cannot (still) work this out is just further proof of what a fucking dillweed you really are

So just STFU and fuck off

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites





And it gets worse: “A new despotism, which in terms of pervasive controls and cessation of every political activity, will be worse that the totalitarianisms we have known so far.” 

Agamben redoubles his analyses of science as the religion of our time: “The analogy with religion is taken literally; theologians declared that they could not clearly define what is God, but in his name they dictated rules of conduct to men and did not hesitate to burn heretics. Virologists admit they don’t know exactly what is a virus, but in its name they pretend to decide how human beings shall live.”    





ims, you probably believe the fed is a well intentioned body that sometimes makes mistakes... here’s another viewpoint



... just say in' pigeon enclish

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gently at the beginning  - cause      ......   We’re all in this (staying apart) together.



Instead of asking calmly if hydroxychloroquine works, or if the less restrictive Swedish crisis response has merit, or questioning why certain statistical assumptions about the seriousness of the crisis might have been off, we’re denouncing the questions themselves as infamous. Or we’re politicizing the framing of stories in a way that signals to readers what their take should be before they even digest the material. “Conservative Americans see coronavirus hope in Progressive Sweden,” reads a Politico headline, as if only conservatives should feel optimism in the possibility that a non-lockdown approach might have merit! Are we rooting for such an approach to not work?

From everything I’ve heard, talking to doctors and reading the background material, the Bakersfield doctors are probably not the best sources. But the functional impact of removing their videos (in addition to giving them press they wouldn’t otherwise have had) is to stamp out discussion of things that do actually need to be discussed, like when the damage to the economy and the effects of other crisis-related problems – domestic abuse, substance abuse, suicide, stroke, abuse of children, etc. – become as significant a threat to the public as the pandemic. We do actually have to talk about this. We can’t not talk about it out of fear of being censored, or because we’re confusing real harm with political harm.

Turning ourselves into China for any reason is the definition of a cure being worse than the disease. The scolders who are being seduced by such thinking have to wake up, before we end up adding another disaster on top of the terrible one we’re already facing.






Just as centralized decision-making by the very few led to immense desperation during the 20thcentury, so logically does it lead to sub-optimal outcomes in the 21st.  Some have said that expert-informed political responses to the new coronavirus have resulted in cures worse than the disease, which is really a blinding glimpse of the obvious. Anytime the possible brilliance of the few is substituted for the decentralized knowledge of the marketplace, odds are high that something resembling “crisis” will reveal itself. Experts are routinely called on as the answer to “crises,” when it’s more realistic to assert that the experts are the crisis.




The mystery of why today vast numbers of governments around the world (but not all) have crushed economies, locked people under house arrest, wrecked business, spread despair, disregarded basic freedoms and rights will require years if not decades to sort out.

Is it the news cycle that is creating mass hysteria? Political ambition and arrogance? A decline in philosophical regard for freedom as the best system for dealing with crises? Most likely, the ultimate answer will look roughly like what historians say about the Great War (WWI): it was a perfect storm that created a calamity that no one intended at the outset.

For staying calm and treating the terrible Asian flu of 1957 as a medical problem to address with medical intelligence, rather than as an excuse to unleash Medieval-style brutality, this first postwar generation deserves our respect and admiration.





...In other words, the "mitigation" strategies that allegedly save lives are really just shifting the burden from some people onto to others. In some cases, the lockdowns amount to nearly a decade of lost years thanks to the toll on mental health.

Confronted with the likely costs of their lockdown policies, many will fall back on claiming basic arithmetic can give us the answer. "How many deaths are caused by unemployment versus by COVID-19?" This claim is premised on the idea that it's up to the defenders of freedom to prove that the number of deaths caused by economic destruction will outnumber the total COVID-19 deaths. In the minds of the lockdown advocates, if the net number of lives saved by continued lockdown is even a single person, then their policies throwing freedom and the rule of law under the bus are totally justified.

They get it wrong, of course. The burden of proof is on them. After all, they are the ones advocating for violence. That is, they are the ones who want to impose fines on nonviolent people who just want to open their shops, or go to work, or sell their labor for wages. If those people don't comply, the prolockdown position is that these "disobedient" people must then be locked in cages or ruined financially through fines, lawsuits, and criminal charges.

The opponents of the lockdowns, on the other hand, only wish to allow people to exercise their freedom.

The burden of proof lies on those who wish to use police powers to coerce others.

Moreover, the truth is that the "experts" have no idea how much the lockdowns are even preventing the spread of disease or how employment and economic growth would be affected in the absence of coerced lockdowns. The lockdown proponents simply don't have enough data to make the case for their position. They only know they desire to force people to abandon their jobs, abandon their shops, and indefinitely embrace a life on the dole....









not so gently now 

Demonstration of why I’ve been calling out (facsist) Fakebook and Goggle for years

Via: Nicole Sirotek – Facebook:

Let’s see how long it lasts on utub








You want to reclaim some of the ground we’re fast losing to the techno-tyrants?




You don't dare wasch this sht










to Wallace, he states:

“In this book of mine, Brave New World, I postulated a substance called Soma, which was a very versatile drug. It would make people feel happy in small doses, it would make them see visions in medium doses, and it would send them to sleep in large doses.

…this is the pharmacological revolution which is taking place, that we have now powerful mind-changing drugs, which physiologically speaking are almost costless.

…if you want to preserve your power indefinitely, you have to get the consent of the ruled, and this they will do partly by drugs as I foresaw in Brave New World…” ~Aldous Huxley

Furthermore, he spoke about the need to disrupt the natural thought process of human beings, accessing their subconscious minds, so that their emotions instead of logic will lead them. Huxley foresaw advanced forms of propaganda being used to hack the mind’s of the masses.

“[They will do it]… partly by these new techniques of propaganda.

They will do it by bypassing the sort of rational side of man and appealing to his subconscious and his deeper emotions, and his physiology even, and so, making him actually love his slavery.

I mean, I think, this is the danger that actually people may be, in some ways, happy under the new regime, but that they will be happy in situations where they oughtn’t to be happy.

” ~Aldous Huxley







bonus ‘financial’ reading


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2020 at 3:27 PM, zdo said:

ims, you probably believe the fed is a well intentioned body that sometimes makes mistakes... here’s another viewpoint


LOL. Simply brilliant! 😂🤣

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities."

- Voltaire


Let’s review...

We don’t KNOW what is really going on with C1984.  Got that?


All we each have is beliefs about what is really going on with C1984

To review some of the possible beliefs

-Theory 0:  There is no such thing as Covid 19 virus

-Theory 1: Virus jumped from Bats to humans

--   Theory 1.1 Virus jumped from Bats to Pangolins then to humans

--   Theory 1.2 ‘novel’ viruses come into the atmosphere from space

--   Theory 1.3 ...

-Theory 2: C19 is a ’research’ corona accidentally leaked from the lab via black market sale of test animal carc asses at the Wet Market

--    Theory 2.2: Genetically engineered virus accidentally leaked from the P3 lab

--Theory 3: Bioweapon produced by the US, smuggled to Wuhan to target Chinese people... it ‘backfired’ all over the world...

-Theory 4: Bioweapon produced by globalist technocrats, distributed all over the world to facilitate turning the whole planet into a ‘china20++’-state.

-Theory5: ...


Let’s shift to the reactions to C19

>Policy# Continue life as usual

>Policy# Lock down and protect the elderly and vulnerable,

>Policy# Lockdown everyone everywhere until the ‘statistics’ say it’s ok to come back out

>Policy# Lockdown everyone everywhere until ‘everyone’ is dependent on the state... thousands of deaths / billions with loss of independent livelihood.  ... until every business is explicitly in debt to the devil

>Policy# Lockdown everyone until everyone is tested.  Give social licenses to those who tested ‘positive’ and are still alive (on a test that tests for genetic sequences that may or may not be viral)

> -Policy#.1 Lockdown everyone until everyone is tested.  Give social licenses only to those who test ‘negative’ (on a test that tests for genetic sequences that may or may not be viral)

>Policy# Lockdown everyone everywhere until there is a vaccine ( a vaccine that, btw, has a snowballs chance in hell of nailing THE virus... a vaccine where nailing the virus is not the goal at all, rather spreading the other agents in the ‘vaccine’ non related to a virus is the goal ... and this vaccine has already been developed awaiting the optimal time disseminate it)





Belief is what you do when you don’t know.   We don’t KNOW which one of these policies is the best.   Since you don’t KNOW, are you are likely to believe the one(s) that are most believed by others... the one’s most effectively / subtly propagandized  ... the one’s that make you feel safest (even if they actually provide no real safety and in second order effects may be the most unsafe)  ??

There is science / pseudoscience to support EVERY one of these beliefs. Narratives and media propaganda is available to support EVERY one of these beliefs. 

And there is  censorship/programming to discount and actively suppress EACH one of these beliefs.

Examples of examples

Google is blatantly censoring links on searches... You’re going to get what they want you to see - no matter how specific your search string is.

Youtube is shutting down videos left and right that question the official narratives and/or ‘statistics’ ... as if you can’t handle it.

Fakebook is banning content that questions anything that is not straight down the pike with the WHO narrative.

Apple acts the most righteous regarding rights... likely making them ultimately the most hypocritical

Belief is what you do when you don’t know.  You don’t know what’s real about this ‘pandemic’ .  As much as we would like to accept how advanced virology is - the painful fucking truth is ‘science’ does not really have an understanding of viruses.  Each of these theories and policies has its own crowd.  For safety and subjective reduction of uncertainty and confusion, you are joining one of these crowds.

I’m just sayin drop out of your crowd ... if you can...even if it is only to temporarily suspend your ‘safe’ belief(s).  Question your beliefs.  Be inclusive of the other beliefs ... understanding that they are personal substitutes for knowing. ... understanding none of them deserve to be the basis for the ideas of a few to shape human life.

He's  just sayin drop out of your crowd too   https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/05/07/suspicion-and-skepticism-are-vaccines-for-deception/





Is this to be the new ‘normal’, whereby fear, mistrust, division and suspicion are internalized throughout society? In an age of fear and paranoia, are we all to be ‘contact traced’ and regarded by others as a ‘risk’ until we prove ourselves by wearing face masks and by voluntarily subjecting ourselves to virus tests at the entrances to stores or in airports?

And if we refuse or test positive, are we to be shamed, isolated and forced to comply by being ‘medicated’ (vaccinated and chipped)?

Is this the type of world that’s soon to be regarded as ‘normal’?

A world in which liberty and fundamental rights mean nothing. A world dominated by shaming and spurious notions of personal responsibility that are little more than ideological constructs of a hegemonic narrative which labels rational thinking people as ‘anti-science’ – a world in which the scourge of authoritarianism reigns supreme.






this one has all the earmarks of naiveté  https://economicprism.com/beware-of-plans-to-build-back-better/ especially as you reckon with the realities of the BIG (global level) ‘plans’ being implemented as we speak










fade to black the 'plandemic' ... fade in personal finances








"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities."

- Voltaire

In the last 200 years, technocracy has made greater gains than all the other technologies combined... I'm just sayin.  You just see'n?

"Those who can make you believe absurdities about yourself, can make you commit atrocities on yourself."

- Voltwatere

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


from yesterday's  - "Google is blatantly censoring links on searches... You’re going to get what they want you to see - no matter how specific your search string is."

and you are not going to get what they don't want you to see. 

This deserves just a little bit more than a shrug so here is an example

On Sat. May 9 Zerohedge posted this article




This morning I put a quote out of the article into google and an image of the results is attached. 

No results found for "This, according to BMO, is what’s driving the paradoxical relationship between bond and equity prices in recent weeks, and explains w".

That is a blatant lie because the second query result is a re-run of the original article in another site and the search with quotes DID find something.  It found the quote!  We can be assured  google had indexed the original source and the search also found the original zh article - but censored it!

Results for This, according to BMO, is whats driving the paradoxical relationship between bond and equity prices in recent weeks, and explains w (without quotes):

Returned a bunch of bullshit... no doubt prioritize by what they wanted to show not what we want to see! 

... that is  -assuming what we want to see is the plain and simple truth - in this case it is simply the original link regardless of whether google likes or hates zerohedge or not!  This is only an example from the financial world.  Go 'searching' in political, scientific, or health topics and it GETS MUCH "do        evil" WORSE!



so here is a trade recommendation :)  

Buy the faamgs.  they are the vanguard,, on the b leading edge, of the path into darkness






I close with some quotes from one of your enemies ... who also happens to be a total moron


What they’re going to do is they’re going to keep this going until they reach the point where they think, we’ve now reached a situation where we transformed human society, we have destroyed the independent livelihood of enormous numbers of people, and it’s irreversible. And that’s what they’re holding on to. And what you’re going to see is some of it rolled back, as little as they can get away with, and then they’re planning new waves of the virus… and then they will bring lockdown back.

(what an idiot. he's dummer than chauncy)


On using fear to control:


Once you trigger the survival mechanism, then all rational thought disappears, because the only thing, I must survive, and so, if I must survive by staying in my house and seeing my whole life disappear, then I must. And by the way, if it will help me to survive, then I will agree to any level of Draconian imposition, as long as I think it will help me survive. This the survival mechanism…

all rational thought never EVER disappears... except when .... all rational thought never ever appears


On creating massive social dependency on the government:


The plan in this Hunger Games society is to create mass dependency by giving people, with no other form of income by then, what is called a guaranteed income. And it would be a pittance. Survival level. But that guaranteed income… would come with strings. You get the guaranteed income, but you do what the State says or you don’t get it…

David Icke


the full interview here:



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reply to this topic... Skim these - if you can https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/globalization-dead5-20.html https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/cycles5-20.html https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/opt-out5-20.html https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/tinas-orgy5-20.html https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/stocks-fragility5-20.html and if you’re still strong and not  burnt out https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/demand5-20.html https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/social-media-plantation5-20.html
    • Open a new NinjaTrader Brokerage account by June 30th and SAVE on a Lifetime license with a discounted price of only $999! Along with access to the most powerful version of NinjaTrader, you will save even more with deep discount commissions at $.09 per Micro futures contract & only $50 margins. Your Lifetime license includes ALL of NinjaTrader’s premium features: Award-winning order entry including Chart Trader & OCO orders Order Flow + tool set featuring the Volume Profile Indicator – NinjaTrader’s most powerful indicator to date ATM Strategies, advanced Alerting system, auto-close positions for additional risk management & more PLUS all future NinjaTrader platform enhancements are included at no additional charge – for life! Simply fund your new account with the minimum of $400 by June 30th to lock in your savings. Questions? Contact us at 312.262.1289 or brokeragesales@ninjatrader.com. Platform License Discount Requirements: Account must be opened & funded in June 2020 with $400 minimum Discount is applicable to software purchase only 2nd accounts for current NinjaTrader Brokerage account owners are not eligible for platform discounts Futures and Forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. View Full Risk Disclosure.
    • Date : 01st June 2020. Events to Look Out for This Week.Geopolitics are back in the picture giving the markets pause and adding another layer of uncertainty to a shaky global outlook. However other than US-China tension, next week the global data dockets are heavy and results are likely to underscore the cratering in global economies this quarter. The calendar includes the US Jobs Report and Monetary policy meeting from RBA, BOC and ECB.Monday – 01 June 2020 Caixin Manufacturing PMI (CNY, GMT 01:45) – The Caixin manufacturing PMI is expected to slightly improve to 49.6 from 49.4 in May. ISM Manufacturing PMI (USD, GMT 14:00) – The ISM index is expected to slip to 40.0 in May from 41.5 in April, compared to a recession-low of 34.5 in December of 2008. Tuesday – 02 June 2020   Interest Rate Decision & Statement (RBA, GMT 04:30) – The RBA meet and are unlikely to move rates below historic lows at 0.25%, as RBA Gov. Lowe is his recent statement repeated that negative interest rates extraordinarily unlikely. RBA will maintain its expansionary monetary policies until progress is made towards full employment and we are confident on inflation . Wednesday – 03 June 2020   Gross Domestic Product (AUD, GMT 01:30) – GDP is the economy’s most important figure. Q1’s GDP is expected to slow down at 0.3% q/q and 1.9% y/y. Unemployment data (EUR, GMT 07:55-09:00) – The German unemployment rate in May is expected to have increased to 6.2% from 5.8%, while unemployment change is expected to have declined to 194K from April’s 373K. Meanwhile, Eurozone’s April unemployment rate should rise to 7.7% from 7.4% last month. ADP Employment Change (USD, GMT 12:15) – Lasts month, ADP report revealed a -20,236k April drop that undershot the -19,520k private payroll decline by -716k. For May a -9,000k drop is seen, since nearly all measures of activity rose in May from a trough. ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI (USD, GMT 14:00) – The ISM-NMI index is expected to rise to 46.0 from 41.8 in April. Most producer sentiment reports should show May rebounds after huge April declines due to mandatory closures, on top of the demand hit initially associated with the pandemic, and the oil price plunge with the OPEC price war, as re-openings are underway in most states. The April drop in the ISM survey was much smaller than the declines seen in other measures, however, and this is why we expect a further drop in May for that measure. Interest Rate Decision and Monetary Policy Statement (CAD, GMT 14:00) – On April 15, the Bank held rates steady at 0.25%, matching widespread expectations. In the next policy statement, the BoC is expected to leave rates unchanged, the Bank of Canada Governor Poloz said is his last interview that negative rates are needed only in extreme conditions. Thursday – 04 June 2020   Interest Rate Decision, Monetary Policy Statement and Press Conference (EUR, GMT 11:45 & 12:30) – Given that Lagarde buried any hope of a “mild” recession, the stage seems set for an extension of the PEPP program in size and duration at next week’s council meeting with an end date next year giving the economy more time to recover and EU aid programs to come into effect. Given that the ECB is no longer putting much hope in a quick recovery it is already clear that with the current time frame until the end of December that would risk a sharp widening of spreads in the second half of the year, when there is also the risk of a second wave of Covid-19 infections. Jobless Claims (USD, GMT 12:30)– US initial jobless claims contracted last week by -323k to 2,123k in the week ended May 23 after tumbling -241k to 2,446k previously. Claims have been declining since surging to 6,867k in the March 27 week. Friday – 05 June 2020   Event of the Week – Non-Farm Payrolls (USD, GMT 12:30) – A -2,200k May nonfarm payroll drop is anticipated, following a -20,527 April collapse, and a -701k drop in March. The jobless rate should rise to 17.5% from 14.7% from April, versus 4.4% in March. Nearly all measures of activity rose in May from a trough just after the April BLS survey week, but the initial and continuing claims data suggest a weaker labor market in mid-May than mid-April. Average hourly earnings are assumed to fall -1.0% with a partial unwind of the April distortion from layoffs being concentrated in low-wage categories. This would translate to a drop in the y/y gain to 6.6% from 7.9%. Labour Market Data (CAD, GMT 12:30) – Canada employment plunged -1993.8k in April, nearly doubling the -1010.7k tumble in March to leave a massive and rapid reversal in the labour market as firms cut jobs as most of the economy ceased to function amid the stay at home orders the began around the middle of March. For May employment should revealed a 4,000k drop in jobs, doubling again last months number. B]Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.[/B]Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Moar questions how many corps in the SP500, NQ100, etc indexes are "rolling in revenue"?  ie they have more revenue than they did 6 months ago ??  thx.  just askin'       Weekend reading https://consentfactory.org/2020/05/20/brave-new-normal-part-2/   https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay20/demand5-20.html
    • When you learn all fundamentals about trading, then you can move towards successful trading, but still unsure about profit.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.