Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

M.A

What is "consistency"?

Recommended Posts

"To be a successful trader u need to be consistently profitable".

I have read similar statements countless times on forums. Consistent profitability assures that a strategy is good enough to beat market in the time period in which a strategy is tested. Even most successful traders loose a percentage of trades. So consistent profitability is usually measured in different ways by different traders. Most popular, IMO, is to check monthly results. But does everyone take end-of-the-month results to measure consistent profitability?

 

Does consistency mean to be profitable every day? Every week? or every month? Or do u measure it by analyzing making "n" sets of trading history and then check if each set is profitable or not? Do u think it depends on trading style?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"To be a successful trader u need to be consistently profitable".

I have read similar statements countless times on forums. Consistent profitability assures that a strategy is good enough to beat market in the time period in which a strategy is tested. Even most successful traders loose a percentage of trades. So consistent profitability is usually measured in different ways by different traders. Most popular, IMO, is to check monthly results. But does everyone take end-of-the-month results to measure consistent profitability?

 

Does consistency mean to be profitable every day? Every week? or every month? Or do u measure it by analyzing making "n" sets of trading history and then check if each set is profitable or not? Do u think it depends on trading style?

 

I'll tell you one thing. I placed upon myself the paradigm that I need to be consistently profitable "X" amount each day to cover what I need every month. I think it's worked against me. There is almost a symphony of ebb and flow to doing this. There are moments when a quick trade for easy profits is necessary and those times when it's best to sit back and let the position breath, even if it means you don't have a big week.

Edited by Enigmatics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M.A.

 

re "What is 'consistency'?"

Historically the favored way for measuring managers is adequate slope and sufficient smoothness of equity curve.

 

:nowgoingofftopik???: I have found that it’s best for me to ‘measure’ consistency not on outcomes, but on the consistency of my own moment to moment and day to day perceptual acuity … (fwiw, that's individualized info…learned through naturally being a little bit more mutable than average, and across many years of often trading multiple systems at once, realizing the long hard way that returns are simply not consistent across time… strive for inner consistency … outer / returns consistency – forgetaboutit :) )

 

Steady, ‘consistent’ returns across a long sample often means the trader is running mm (too) far below the optimum… yet (somehow) finding a way to remain ‘exposed’ anyways…;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
adequate slope and sufficient smoothness of equity curve

Gud one. I think having a look at equity curve will be enough to check profit consistency.

 

Steady, ‘consistent’ returns across a long sample often means the trader is running mm (too) far below the optimum

 

There is no optimum level and we can always do better. I understand that even consisten returns doesnt mean optimum level. But does it mean "far below optimum"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no optimum level and we can always do better. I understand that even consisten returns doesnt mean optimum level. But does it mean "far below optimum"?

 

When I said "Steady, ‘consistent’ returns across a long sample often means the trader is running mm (too) far below the optimum…" I was talking about sizing mostly... not personal performance...

 

MM math has one sizing schema that approximates optimum-f... a 'sweet spot' sizing for the expectancy (has to be +) of a particular system. Setting aside the practical part that optimal-f is still to high and just focusing on the 'theoretical' - what I was saying is if you run at about a third of optimal - f (for most 'typical' systems) you will produce a little bit more of the smooth part of 'consistency' (as defined) (... and a lower slope too... btw.) ... very generally speaking though...

It's all really system specific.

...and one of the best 'professional' traders I've ever known, Dinesh D., routinely 'outperformed' and routinely had a very jagged eCurve and routinely was in (up to) 40% drawdowns... to talk with him you would project that he was risk averse and seeking consistency... but somehow in real life trading he was able to forego 'consistency'...

 

A properly correlated and dynamically sized 'portfolio of systems' is the penultimate 'consistency' machine...

 

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is hard to undestand u or maybe I am the only one not getting u.

I have read about optimal-f mm, not in detail thoug. Even if we use 1/3 of optimal-f, curve will not change because Profit/Loss ratio doesnt depend on optimal-f. The only change will be in amounts and thus in individual percentages for profit and loss.

 

Also, with Dinesh example, are u saying that a risk averse trader routinely has 40% drawdown and he is a professional trader? Sounds weird. Isnt it a bad definition of a Pro trader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M.A.

 

You are joining those who realize that I am probably the worst communicator ever… but for the occasional soul who does actually benefit from my communications, I wouldn’t even bother...

 

Re: “Even if we use 1/3 of optimal-f,” … that’s correct. The red runs and accomp. drawdowns will still occur. However if you run the tests on most typical systems at circa .33 optimal-f the EC will look SMOOTHER – which is one of the ways of metricking ‘consistency’ we were discussing. It is system dependent. If you bitfiddle and slide testing up and down around that .33 of optimal-f, you will find each system’s smoothest %... never will be all smooth… except for the occasional chance and temporary anomaly

 

with Dinesh example, I was briefly discussing the broader side of the question

What is "consistency"?. …and I didn’t say he was a risk averse trader. I meant that in my initial personal contacts with him my impressions belied the actual amount ‘unconsistency’ he could tolerate.

And btw, 40% drawdowns do not ‘define’ a professional trader as bad at all. (These days he wouldn't get hired as a manager... but..).

It is system dependent. For example, at the returns per instrument level (not portf level), one of the most ‘inconsistent’ methods you could ever apply is true and near true trend trading. Each trader needs to ‘study’ him or herself AND ‘study’ the available systems and then align himself to the systems most compatible to himself… the varying 'need' for ‘consistency’ is an aspect of that …we all would love ‘consistency’ in the ideal… but in actual practice some of us can tolerate more inconsistency than others can.

Anecdotally… coming up on 30 years trading and when I look back and remember the times I felt the need and tried to figure out how to be more ‘consistent’ in my trading per se that was typically just a symptom of much deeper issues… just sayin…

 

All the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are joining those who realize that I am probably the worst communicator ever

Nope. I do not plan on joining any "group" :). But this is fact that ur writing style is a bit difficult for me to understand. Maybe due to too many abbreviations or maybe due to some other reason.

 

About 0.33 of optimal-f...maybe an example would be best because I am still confused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.