Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

aaa

MACD Divergence TrendLine

Recommended Posts

// Author: aaa

// from: MARKPLEX Code Divergence

// http://markplex.com/tutorial4.php

// version: 1.0

// Date: 20100501

// added:

// divergence on top +

// Line.Color.Top + Line.Color.Bot + Line.Size + Plot.MACD in inputs

[/url]

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20838&stc=1&d=1272711737

 

PS : Stochastic Divergence TrendLine here

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/stochastic-divergence-trendline-7244.html

Snap1.jpg.53e5f34bc7ec8364bf117cbba667c19f.jpg

MACD DIVERGENCE TRENDLINE.ELD

MACD Divergence TrendLines.pla

MACD Divergence TrendLine.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TL_NEW

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

Text_New

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

 

I'm wondering if it's possible 2 draw divergences lines to an indicator ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TL_NEW

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

Text_New

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

 

I'm wondering if it's possible 2 draw divergences lines to an indicator ?

 

 

do you mean trendline ?

 

TL_NEW

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....

I'm wondering if it's possible 2 draw divergences lines to an indicator ?

 

sure, why not?

 

just duplicate everything...

make sure you name the variables with -1 and -2 suffix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TAMS

 

Always here 2 help absent-minded

 

Oups... I've forgot 2 attach my work in my last post...

 

do you mean trendline ?

 

Yes and I've tried also Text_New

 

make sure you name the variables with -1 and -2 suffix.

 

I've done it but w/o succes

 

I was wondering if it's allowed by EL 2 change iPrice by the iValue of an indicator ?

 

This reserved word adds a trendline with the specified starting and ending points to a price chart. It returns a numeric expression corresponding to the ID number of the trendline added to the chart.

 

Value1 = TL_New(iBarDate, iBarTime, iPrice, eBarDate, eBarTime, ePrice)

 

If U have Xtra time, Would U mind 2 have a look on my attachement ?

 

regards

 

aaa

MACD Divergence TrendLines Indicator.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
only plot trendlines directly on the MACD indicator

 

LOL... you knew I was going to ask you to make a drawing... but...

 

 

to draw in subchart, you need TL_NEW_SELF.

 

this is a MultiCharts exclusive keyword.

 

 

in this case, you do not need to duplicate the variables and calculations...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's not possible in Easy Language but possible in Power Language

 

it's amazing that U know 110% of Power Language.

 

TAMS, U know what ?

 

U ARE THE BEST !!!

 

TL_New_self

Displays a trendline, with the specified starting and ending points, on the SubChart containing the study; returns a trendline-specific ID number, required to modify the trendline.

Usage

TL_New_self (sDate, sTime, sPriceValue, eDate, eTime, ePriceValue)

Edited by aaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to apply the same principle of divergence to a StochRSI indicator (divergence drawn on both the price and the indicator)?

 

I tried playing with it on my end but getting a ton of errors. I'm not sure if the errors are due to the 2 lines in the stochrsi versus the single line in the MACD. Below is the code that i'm using for the stochrsi:

 

input:

 

RSILength(9),

StochLength(18),

KLength(6),

DLength(3),

oversold(20),

overbought(80),

overscolor(white),

overbcolor(white);

 

Vars:

DToscK(0),

DToscD(0);

 

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);

DToscK = average(value1,KLength);

DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

 

plot1(DToscK,"%K" );

plot2(DToscD,"%D" );

plot3( overbought, "OverBot" ) ;

plot4( oversold, "OverSld" ) ;

 

condition1 = value1 crosses over oversold ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Indicator exiting oversold zone" )

else

begin

condition1 = value1 crosses under overbought ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Indicator exiting overbought zone" ) ;

end;

Edited by lonew0lf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it possible to apply the same principle of divergence to a StochRSI indicator (divergence drawn on both the price and the indicator)?

 

I tried playing with it on my end but getting a ton of errors. I'm not sure if the errors are due to the 2 lines in the stochrsi versus the single line in the MACD. Below is the code that i'm using for the stochrsi:

 

...end;

 

mmm... let me check my crystal ball for your error messages....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man you work fast. Here's what I threw together:

 

//----------------------------------------------------

inputs:

//----------------------------------------------------

 

RSILength(9),

StochLength(18),

KLength(6),

DLength(3),

LeftStrength(3),

RightStrength(3),

Line.Color.Top(magenta),

Line.Color.Bot(magenta),

Line.Size(2),

Plot.stochrsi(1);

 

//----------------------------------------------------

variables:

//----------------------------------------------------

 

DToscK(0),

DToscD(0),

 

var0(0),

var1(0),

var2(0),

oPivotPrice1(0),

oPivotBar1(0),

oPivotPrice2(0),

oPivotBar2(0),

oPivotPrice11(0),

oPivotBar11(0),

oPivotPrice12(0),

oPivotBar12(0);

 

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);

DToscK = average(value1,KLength);

DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

 

var0 = StochRSI( Close, RSILength, StochLength, KLength, DLength );

 

Condition1 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, -1, oPivotPrice1, oPivotBar1 ) <> -1

AND ( oPivotBar1 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

 

Condition11 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, 1, oPivotPrice11, oPivotBar11 ) <> -1

AND ( oPivotBar11 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

 

Condition2 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, -1, oPivotPrice2, oPivotBar2 ) <> -1;

 

Condition12 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, 1, oPivotPrice12, oPivotBar12 ) <> -1;

 

If

Condition1 and Condition2 // added condition2 = referecne future data

AND L[oPivotBar2] >= L[oPivotBar1]

AND var0[oPivotBar2] < var0[oPivotBar1] then

Begin

Value2 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar2], T[oPivotBar2], L[oPivotBar2], D[oPivotBar1], T[oPivotBar1], L[oPivotBar1]);

TL_SetColor( Value2, Line.Color.Bot );

TL_SetSize( Value2, Line.Size );

End;

 

If

Condition11 and Condition12 // added condition12 referecne future data

AND H[oPivotBar12] <= H[oPivotBar11]

AND var0[oPivotBar12] > var0[oPivotBar11] then

Begin

Value12 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar12], T[oPivotBar12], H[oPivotBar12], D[oPivotBar11], T[oPivotBar11], H[oPivotBar11]);

TL_SetColor( Value12, Line.Color.Top );

TL_SetSize( Value12, Line.Size );

End;

 

if Plot.stochrsi <> 0 then

begin

Plot1( var0 );

end;

Edited by lonew0lf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tagged code should look like this:

 

//----------------------------------------------------
inputs:
//----------------------------------------------------

RSILength(9),
StochLength(18),
KLength(6),
DLength(3),
LeftStrength(3),
RightStrength(3),
Line.Color.Top(magenta),
Line.Color.Bot(magenta),
Line.Size(2), 
Plot.stochrsi(1);

 

 

just highlight the code (ie select the text),

then press the # key on the top of the message window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it possible to apply the same principle of divergence to a StochRSI indicator (divergence drawn on both the price and the indicator)?

 

Hello

I will have a look this WE

rgds

aa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*************************

 

If someone else is interested with others indicators divergence trendline like

 

RSI

Mom

CCI

etc...

 

I could post one each WE

 

If U have a preferred one, please post it here

 

It should B fun 2 mix them on a chart ?!

 

************************************

Edited by aaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AAA - thanks for undertaking this endeavor. I've come to like the stochrsi as a good test against my signals. The ability to see divergence would be quite nice.

 

I'm running the MACD divergence on my charts right now and it looks good, hopefully the same will hold true for stochrsi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be interested in the ability to add a moving average or linear moving average to define trend, and only show divergences in the direction of the trend.

 

Greatly cuts down on the signals... but increases the probability of continuation.

 

snowbird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was able to apply divergence to both the price and indicator. Thank you AAA for putting the original together. The below modification applies to the stochrsi:

 

// StochRSI Divergence TrendLine
// Author: MARKPLEX
// http://markplex.com/tutorial4.php
// version: 1.0

// Author: aaa
// version: 2.0
// Date: 20091129
// added: 
// divergence on top +
// Line.Color.Top + Line.Color.Bot + Line.Size + Plot.Sto in inputs

//----------------------------------------------------
inputs:
//----------------------------------------------------


RSILength(9),
StochLength(18),
KLength(6),
DLength(3),
OverSold(20),
OverBought(80),
Length(20),
LeftStrength(3),
RightStrength(3),
Line.Color.Top(red),
Line.Color.Bot(blue),
Line.Size(3),
Plot.stochrsi(1);

//---------------------------------------------------- 
variables:
//----------------------------------------------------

DToscK(0), 
DToscD(0),

oPivotPrice1(0),
oPivotBar1(0),
oPivotPrice2(0),
oPivotBar2(0),

oPivotPrice11(0),
oPivotBar11(0),
oPivotPrice12(0),
oPivotBar12(0);

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);
DToscK =  average(value1,KLength);
DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

Condition1 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, -1, oPivotPrice1, oPivotBar1 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar1 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

Condition11 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, 1, oPivotPrice11, oPivotBar11 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar11 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

Condition2 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, -1, oPivotPrice2, oPivotBar2 ) <> -1;

Condition12 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, 1, oPivotPrice12, oPivotBar12 ) <> -1;

If 
	Condition1 and Condition2 // added condition2 = referecne future data
	AND L[oPivotBar2] >= L[oPivotBar1] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar2] < DToscK[oPivotBar1] then 
Begin
	Value2 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar2], T[oPivotBar2], L[oPivotBar2], D[oPivotBar1], T[oPivotBar1], L[oPivotBar1]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value2, Line.Color.Bot );
	TL_SetSize(  Value2, Line.Size  );
End;

If 
	Condition11 and Condition12 // added condition12  referecne future data
	AND H[oPivotBar12] <= H[oPivotBar11] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar12] > DToscK[oPivotBar11] then 
Begin
	Value12 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar12], T[oPivotBar12], H[oPivotBar12], D[oPivotBar11], T[oPivotBar11], H[oPivotBar11]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value12, Line.Color.Top );
	TL_SetSize(  Value12, Line.Size  );
End;

if Plot.stochrsi <> 0 then	
Plot1( DToscK );


condition3 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, -1, oPivotPrice1, oPivotBar1 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar1 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

condition32 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, 1, oPivotPrice11, oPivotBar11 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar11 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

condition4 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, -1, oPivotPrice2, oPivotBar2 ) <> -1;

condition42 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, 1, oPivotPrice12, oPivotBar12 ) <> -1;

If 
	Condition3 and condition4 
	AND L[oPivotBar2] >= L[oPivotBar1] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar2] < DToscK[oPivotBar1] then 
Begin
	Value2 = TL_New_SELF(D[oPivotBar2], T[oPivotBar2], DToscK[oPivotBar2], D[oPivotBar1], T[oPivotBar1], DToscK[oPivotBar1]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value2, Line.Color.Bot );
	TL_SetSize(  Value2, Line.Size  );
End;

If 
	Condition32 and Condition42
	AND H[oPivotBar12] <= H[oPivotBar11] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar12] > DToscK[oPivotBar11] then 
Begin
	Value12 = TL_New_SELF(D[oPivotBar12], T[oPivotBar12], DToscK[oPivotBar12], D[oPivotBar11], T[oPivotBar11], DToscK[oPivotBar11]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value12, Line.Color.Top );
	TL_SetSize(  Value12, Line.Size  );
End;

Plot1( DToscK, "stochrsi",      white );
plot2( 20,    "oversold", white);
plot3(80, "overbought", white);

StochRSI Divergence.pla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.