Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Good Morning All:

 

Over the years, I have written many articles. Hundreds, maybe even thousands if you include partial repeats and every short lesson. Sometimes the lesson is a partial re-write, or a new take, or a new way to explain or organize the information.

 

While there are many summaries out there on various topics, and while the topics on this lesson may be found somewhere else, I began last week answering a very direct question. What causes failure in trading? This will be a no-nonsense, nuts and bolts look at the question, not a philosophical dissertation. I will discuss the top three over three letters. Last week I discussed 'discipline'. Today I will discuss the second of the three reasons for failure. To clarify again, most people actually fail because they do not get an education. However, that is decision people make. I want to discuss why the people who really try, can still fail.

 

Last week I opened here telling you of an inescapable truth I discovered long ago. Everyone who enters trading is exactly the same, and stay the same for a long time. Reason number two for failure continues that tradition. Reason number two, is the lack of, or the inability to, focus.

 

Yes, all of these topics are somewhat interrelated. Nevertheless, they each also have their own merit. Discipline and lack of focus are not the same thing. You may not have focus due to a lack of discipline, but you may not have focus by design.

 

Many traders come to the market with the view that they have to become the master of all around them. They feel they need to learn about economic data, currency rates, foreign politics, and the list goes on. When traders learn technical analysis, the feel the need to put everything to use. I have seen trading plans that have 14 strategies spelled out for a new trader. Yet, all of that information is not going to change what a stock does that gaps over a red bar and pulls back to minor support. It will not change what happens to a stock that is in a perfect 15-minute uptrend.

 

Closing Comments:

 

Perhaps you have read the book "Market Wizards" by Jack Schwager. You should take note of the point of the book. In this book, the author sets out to interview 25 successful traders to determine what they have in common. He wants to find out what strategy it is that they all do, or how the strategies are similar. He finds two things that all traders have in common. One of them, the one we care about, was that no two did anything remotely similar in strategy, however, they all focused on one unique thing, waited for it to happened, and did only that. Focus.

 

Paul Lange

Vice President of Services

Pristine Capital Holdings, Inc.

educator_plange.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The impression Schwager's book gives is characterized by the original post....that there are many different ways to make money in the markets....this may be true, however thats only part of the story......if the reader looks a bit closer......each of these traders had to engage in extensive research........but you don't read about that in Schwager's book.......and what "really" happened was....some of them found an edge (something that provided a mathematical advantage) that enabled them to make a lot of money.....from my point of view the important question is, "did that edge last, or did it eventually disappear and did they adapt"?

 

Now....some years removed from the original publication of Jack Schwager's books, we know some of the answers to those questions.......some of those traders are known either adapted to a changing environment, or they found themselves back where they started....(refer to Linda Raschke, and Tom Baldwin for example)

 

Yes, there are many ways to make money in the market, but regardless of the method you choose, you still have to do the research....to make sure that the method you choose, (indicators, price action, or magical incantations) provides a real mathematical edge....

 

Interestingly, these vendors never seem to be able to provide that kind of very real education to their students....and on the other hand I have to say...students are easy marks, because invariably they don't WANT to do that research......one gets the impression that both parties "deserve each other".....lol

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The impression Schwager's book gives is characterized by the original post....that there are many different ways to make money in the markets....this may be true, however thats only part of the story......if the reader looks a bit closer......each of these traders had to engage in extensive research........but you don't read about that in Schwager's book.......and what "really" happened was....some of them found an edge (something that provided a mathematical advantage) that enabled them to make a lot of money.....from my point of view the important question is, "did that edge last, or did it eventually disappear and did they adapt"?

 

Now....some years removed from the original publication of Jack Schwager's books, we know some of the answers to those questions.......some of those traders are known either adapted to a changing environment, or they found themselves back where they started....(refer to Linda Raschke, and Tom Baldwin for example)

 

Yes, there are many ways to make money in the market, but regardless of the method you choose, you still have to do the research....to make sure that the method you choose, (indicators, price action, or magical incantations) provides a real mathematical edge....

 

Interestingly, these vendors never seem to be able to provide that kind of very real education to their students....and on the other hand I have to say...students are easy marks, because invariably they don't WANT to do that research......one gets the impression that both parties "deserve each other".....lol

 

No, I dont think they deserve each other, but there is no enjoying the fruits of your labor if you are constantly wondering when your system is going to fall apart either. This makes you stay up all night creating back up systems for when the shoe drops. Then the enjoyment of trading slowly goes away as you start to feel like a hamster on a wheel never able to rest. I wonder how many of the guys in Market Wizards had guys doing that "For" them or at least with them. I mean notice in this 3 year bull market , how many more vendors appeared out of nowhere. It means they had winning systems and suddenly they stopped working because too many of them are way too elaborate to have just been created as scams. IMHO as a swing trader for over 14 years and a day trader for a few, Paul Lange is one of the few that has survived. Yet even he wont go out on his own, he likes that monthly check from Pristine as his backup. You think he wants his kids college education depending on his ability to stay constant with its ever changing behaviors. The fact that Paul never started his own small fund or private pool says a lot. And he is about the best out there. What do the rest of us do? BTW.....I know from being in Pauls room, exactly what he advises traders to do. I know all the steps he made us write down. But, I also find there is an adverse corrolation to studying your charts "past a certain point" to starting to go in reverse and second guess yourself, especially after youve lost a few days in a row. Many of Pauls students use scanners and its just my opinion that luck plays a part in simply when you lift your head up to glance at the scanner to see what stock is in play. I was on the verge of putting 1/2 my life savings into an acct in fact drom what I learned just in Pauls books and tips, let alone the room when suddenly family tragedies occured for several months, and when I got back into trading after a year break, I lost something I still to this day cant get back. BTW.....Im not ashamed to say I am first going to read Pauls article now, because after over a year studying with him, Im pretty sure I know what he will say.(smile)

 

Vince

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well "Vince" respectfully I would suggest you are missing the point....professionals do not stay up nights worrying about when their systems are going to fail.....Instead of worrying constantly, they maintain good records, and they continue to do research KNOWING that at some point, they will need to adapt as the markets change around them...

 

With respect to your comment "wondering if these market wizards have others doing research for them"....I know a few of these traders, and those that are known to me do their own research or at the very least, they collaborate with other traders...why? because when you do your own work, you know that you can trust the results...this becomes very important because these are folks who often put on size (when I last talked to Linda Raschke, she was trading mutiples of 20 contracts at a time). You can't really do that unless you have confidence that your system has a significant mathematical edge.

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • USD/JPY IS REACHING BEARISH EXHAUSTION, MAY REVERSE AT LEVEL 103.23 Key Resistance Levels: 111.000, 112.000, 113.000 Key Support Levels: 104.000, 103.000, 102.000 USD/JPY Price Long-term Trend: Bearish The USD/JPY pair has been in a downward move since November 12 after a rebound above level 103.30. The pair is approaching the previous support at level 103.30. The selling pressure will resume if the current is broken. The Yen will resume an upward move if the support holds. USD/JPY – Daily Chart Daily Chart Indicators Reading: The 21-day SMA and the 50-day SMA are sloping downward indicating the downtrend. The pair has fallen to level 40 of the Relative Strength Index period 14. The pair is in the downtrend zone and capable of falling. USD/JPY Medium-term Trend: Bearish On the 4-hour chart, the pair has been in a downward move after rejection at 105.00. On November 18 downtrend; a retraced candle body tested the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level. This indicates that the market will fall to level 1.272 Fibonacci extensions. That is the Yen will reach the low of level 103.23 and reverse. USD/JPY – 4 Hour Chart 4-hour Chart Indicators Reading The USD/JPY pair is currently above the 25% range of the daily stochastic. It indicates that the pair is in a bullish momentum. The SMAs are sloping downward indicating the downtrend. General Outlook for USD/JPY USD/JPY has been on a downward move but the selling pressure is reaching bearish exhaustion. According to the Fibonacci tool analysis, the Yen will fall and reverse at level 103.23. Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • EURJPY BEARISH MOMENTUM REMAINS TOWARD 123.00 LEVEL EURJPY Price Analysis – November 20 The EURJPY pair is attempting to close beneath the 123.37 price zone as speculative interest stays trapped between coronavirus outbreaks and vaccine hopes. The pairs selling momentum remains toward the 123.00 level. Key Levels Resistance Levels: 127.07, 125.00, 123.37 Support Levels: 122.37, 121.61, 119.31 EURJPY Long term Trend: Ranging As seen in the daily time frame, the downside pressure is expected to accelerate if EURJPY breaks below the 123.00 support, exposing the ascending trendline support and the 122.37 low. Meanwhile, the moving average 5 and 13 stays mixed for a range in the coming sessions. If the 123.00 support holds, a surge towards the 123.40 level could be expected during the following trading session. However, a barrier around the MA 13 could serve as a limitation for bullish traders within this session. Lower here a firm breach of 119.31 level will argue that the rise from 114.42 level has completed and turned the focus back lower. EURJPY Short term Trend: Ranging The intraday bias in EURJPY is staying in consolidation with the current recovery. A much more decline is mildly in consideration with 123.37 minor resistance level intact. Beneath the 122.37 level will target a test on the 121.61 low level initially. The resolute breach there may restart the trend from 127.07 level with another decline to 119.31 key support level. On the upside, though, a breach of 123.37 minor resistance level may shift sentiment back to the upside for the 125.00 level instead. Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • Let’s skim some features of Dominion from the manual 1. Dominion is a black box with votes ultimately tabulated in a central server system. Who has access to the central server and where is the manual and security reviews of that server software? 2. Local IT can clandestinely change settings to potentially alter an entire election. There are no checks and balances or observers of the local IT guy when he accesses machine debug and admin settings. Its unclear if a log exists. 3. Many complex rules decide how the “straight ticket” option works, but he system can be set up to ignore votes for individuals if a straight ticket vote is selected. 4. Network Security is very weak since all software access keys use the same cryptographic pair. This gives plausible deniability to whoever potentially decides to mess around with voting settings. It cant be proven who changed a setting since everybody has the same key 5. Digital certificates are not protected by password, and Dominion user manual explicitly says not to enter a password. This enables potential for bad actors to MITM attack data traveling over network between precinct tabulator and central tabulator. 6. Cryptic “split rotation” function that features the ability to “force a maximum deviation”. There is no definition of a “split rotation”, so we cannot know what “force a maximum deviation” means in this instance. 7. Settings can be changed during evening downtime on first night of voting. Much easier to change settings on hundreds of machines than to forge thousands of ballots. A couple of people can do it quickly. 8. The word “Cast” became “Print”, obfuscating the moment when your vote becomes officially cast. Reason for the semantic changes requested by the State of Pennsylvania to the Dominion voting software is currently unknown. 9. There is an option to force the vote scanner to “overrun” a preset amount of ballots every time anybody pauses the scan mid-batch. “Overrun” is undefined. Potential for abuse is high with this function, which was added shortly after 2018 mid-term elections.   ... Americans have a bad and chronic case of “it can’t happen here” ... I'm just sayin'  
    • “The press in our free country is reliable and useful not because of its good character but because of its great diversity. As long as there are many owners, each pursuing his own brand of truth, we the people have the opportunity to arrive at the truth and to dwell in the light. The multiplicity of ownership is crucial. It’s only when there are a few owners, or, as in a government-controlled press, one owner, that the truth becomes elusive and the light fails. For a citizen in our free society, it is was an enormous privilege and a wonderful protection to have access to hundreds of periodicals, each peddling its own belief. There is safety in numbers: the papers expose each other’s follies and peccadillos, correct each other’s mistakes, and cancel out each other’s biases. The reader is was free to range around in the whole editorial bouillabaisse and explore it for the one clam that matters—the truth.”  E. B. White That is gone. And social media is blatantly censoring free expression of viewpoints. ... But,. more insidious than top down media censorship is self censorship.  ... fear of being ‘cancelled’ socially "Media censorship is a shift in the flow of information, while self-censorship is a shift in consciousness. It is the dangerous cornerstone of group-think."  Dylan Thomas     just saying
    • Exchange, supply and demand on them and of course arbitrage between exchanges and starting from recently derivative instruments like CFDs on bitmex 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.