Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

EL - Can It Return All Permutations for a Set of Values?

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

Wondering if anyone can help me . . . I'm playing around with a genetic optimisation concept, and I'm wondering what would be the best way to get EL to return each individual permutation for a set of values. Obviously I can easily calculate the n! factorial, but my requirement is for the code to return (and then process) each individual possible permutation as a string (I use that last word loosely!). Oh, and just to make it a bit more complicated, I want to include repetitions of values, up to and including strings composed entirely of a single value.

 

Hopefully I can make this clearer with an example. Considering the last three periods, and whether they were 'up closes' ('U') or 'down closes' ('D'), the following permutations would be possible:

 

UUU

UUD

UDU

UDD

DUU

DUD

DDU

DDD

 

So, having defined the values 'U' and 'D', how could I instruct EL to return each of these 3-value strings sequentially?

 

Thanks

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need uuu to be a string instead of boolean you could try something like this instead of the boxed code.

 

var: uuu(" ");

 

if up and up[1] and up[2] then uuu="uuu" else uuu=" ";

 

 

var: up(false), dn(false), uuu(false), uud(false), str(" ");

up=c>c[1];
dn=c<c[1];

uuu=up and up[1] and up[2];
uud=up and up[1] and dn[2];

if uuu then str="uuu" else if uud then str="uud" else str="   ";

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Onesmith,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

Unless I'm missing something, then with either approach I would still need to manually set up each possible permutation. This is easy enough in the example I gave where there are only eight permutations, but supposing that I had five possible values ('upstrong','upweak','flat','downstrong','downweak') and considered strings of up to ten values (ie periods) in length, then the number of permutations would be far too large to type.

 

This would pressumably be possible by using the optimisation feature with a strategy report, in which every possible permutation of inputs would be tested. Is there a way to do this on an ongoing basis internally to the code?

 

Cheers,

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BluHorShu

 

Not sure I understand what you’re asking but if you are trying to list all the combo’s look at the essence of something like

Visual Basic Code - List Lotto Combinations with the Lotto CLass

 

or

 

Permutations/Combinations Problem in VBA - CodeGuru Forums

to get you going.

 

Why do you need to process it as strings? Wouldn’t it be better to leave all the permutations in binary data type, process them, and maybe only convert the final outputs to string data type ?

 

btw. Ultimately you will need to put routines like this to a dll and also restrict when it is run (ie definitely not on every tick :) )

 

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As zdo suggests ...binary numbers can be represented as integers

 

and looped from zero to infinity_minus_one

while simultaneously flipping a bit in it's corresponding binary format.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi folks,

 

Wondering if anyone can help me . . . I'm playing around with a genetic optimisation concept, and I'm wondering what would be the best way to get EL to return each individual permutation for a set of values. Obviously I can easily calculate the n! factorial, but my requirement is for the code to return (and then process) each individual possible permutation as a string (I use that last word loosely!). Oh, and just to make it a bit more complicated, I want to include repetitions of values, up to and including strings composed entirely of a single value.

 

Hopefully I can make this clearer with an example. Considering the last three periods, and whether they were 'up closes' ('U') or 'down closes' ('D'), the following permutations would be possible:

 

UUU

UUD

UDU

UDD

DUU

DUD

DDU

DDD

 

So, having defined the values 'U' and 'D', how could I instruct EL to return each of these 3-value strings sequentially?

 

Thanks

 

Bluehorseshoe

 

Variables:  First(0), Second(0), Third(0), mystring(""); 
Variables: First_text(""), Second_text(""), third_text("");

For First = 0 To 1 
Begin
If First = 0 then first_text = "U";
If First = 1 then first_text = "D";
For Second = 0 to 1
Begin
If Second = 0 then second_text = "U";
If Second = 1 then second_text = "D";
For Third = 0 to 1
Begin
If Third = 0 then third_text = "U";
If Third = 1 then third_text = "D";
Mystring = First_text + second_text + third_text;
print(Mystring);
End;
End;
End;

 

If you stick this in an indicator and insert the indicator into some chart it will continually send the 3 letter combinations to the print log. It's not elegant but it is simple

 

Charlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BluHorShu

 

Not sure I understand what you’re asking but if you are trying to list all the combo’s look at the essence of something like

Visual Basic Code - List Lotto Combinations with the Lotto CLass

 

or

 

Permutations/Combinations Problem in VBA - CodeGuru Forums

to get you going.

 

Why do you need to process it as strings? Wouldn’t it be better to leave all the permutations in binary data type, process them, and maybe only convert the final outputs to string data type ?

 

btw. Ultimately you will need to put routines like this to a dll and also restrict when it is run (ie definitely not on every tick :) )

 

hth

 

Hi ZDO,

 

Thanks for your reply. Sorry my question isn't as clear as it might be - I think to convey exactly what I mean would require an explanation of the full context, which could take pages. But I'll have another go:

 

Suppose that I wanted to know whether, following three down closes, an up close or a down close was the more prominent within a historical data set. I could define the series/string/sequence(whatever it should be called) 'DDD' and also create two variables 'DDDD(0)' and 'DDDU(0)' each of which has a "predictive" value for the fourth day.

 

For each instance within the historical data where the sequence 'DDD' occurs, the variable 'DDDD' would predict a fourth down day, and 'DDDU' would predict a fourth up day. By examining the actual outcome on the fourth day, I could then "reward" whichever of the two variables correctly predicted the actual outcome by increasing its value, and "punish" whichever of the variables predicted it incorrectly by decreasing its value. So, in the case of a sequence of closes DDD then the following would happen:

 

If c<c[1] and c[1]<c[2] and c[2]<c[3] then begin
If DDDU>DDDD then
P=DDDU
Else
P=DDDD;
End;
End;

If P[1]=DDDD and c<c[1] then begin
DDDD=DDDD[1]+1;
DDDU=DDDU[1]-1;
End;

If P[1]=DDDU and c>c[1] then begin
DDDU=DDDU[1]+1;
DDDD=DDDD[1]-1;
End;

 

Over time, if three down closes were suceeded by an up close more often than not, then the variable 'DDDU' would grow while the variable 'DDDD' would diminish. The variable 'P', by the way, is part of a slightly different concept of giving precedence to the sequence which has shown the greatest historical predictive capability.

 

In the example above, I have chosen to examine historical probabilities surrounding a particular sequence (three down closes) which I have manually specified. What I am looking for is a mechanical way of processing all possible sequences of a given length in the same fashion.

 

Hopefully my aim is now a little clearer.

 

Thanks.

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BluHorShu

 

Not sure I understand what you’re asking but if you are trying to list all the combo’s look at the essence of something like

Visual Basic Code - List Lotto Combinations with the Lotto CLass

 

or

 

Permutations/Combinations Problem in VBA - CodeGuru Forums

to get you going.

 

Why do you need to process it as strings? Wouldn’t it be better to leave all the permutations in binary data type, process them, and maybe only convert the final outputs to string data type ?

 

btw. Ultimately you will need to put routines like this to a dll and also restrict when it is run (ie definitely not on every tick :) )

 

hth

 

I learnt to program in BASIC many, many years ago, when I was about eleven! I was wondering whether clubbing together a series of 'FOR N=A TO B . . . NEXT' type statements would work? If so, could anyone provide a bit example code to illustrate how this would work in EL?

 

Also, I have clearly confused matters by my use of the word 'String'. I am just using the term as a synonym of 'Sequence', and not in whatever special sense the term functions within EL.

 

Although I am only just begining to explore this whole concept, I doubt that I will want to follow the market on anything like a tick-by-tick basis. The purpose of the code would be to draw out sequences that have demonstrated high predictive properties within a historical data set.

 

Thanks,

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.