Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
Predictor

Price Drivers & Liquidity Providers (in the Futures Market)

Recommended Posts

Most traders focus a great deal of effort on studying how the market moves and why the market moves. But, comparatively fewer spend time thinking about who moves the market and how they make money. One practical benefit of understanding the various participants is the advantage that comes from being able to state more precisely the type of business that you are conducting as a trader. Understanding the various market participants and their objectives, also, helps one to understand the order flow and price action.

 

questionmark.png

Who moves the market?

 

 

The most common participant is the uninformed market participant. The uninformed market participants trades are random, having no edge. These participants do not have an advantage and will lose more money the more they trade. They can make a profit but only by holding the market as it appreciates over time.

 

The next market participant is somewhat familiar and is known as the LIQUIDITY PROVIDER. The liquidity provider attempts to profit from capturing the spread. The liquidity provider attempts to profit from the uninformed order flow by taking the other side. Liquidity providers attempt to make as many trades as possible and pocket the spread over and over. Many displaced floor traders played the role of liquidity providers. Liquidity providers need to trade when the instrument doesn’t move much and when they can execute many trades without risk of the market moving. They profit not from the market making significant movements but rather by the number of times they can capture the spread. Indeed, they are more likely to pull out when the market trends strongly because of the greater risk they take.

 

Finally, we consider what I feel my primary trading role is in the futures market which is driving price to the real value (or predicting the future value). I therefore call this participant a PRICE DRIVER. Price drivers drive the market toward the future value by using market orders. It may seem contrary but price drivers get paid for placing market orders because the payoff comes not from the spread but from the movement of the market to the future value. In general, participants that are time sensitive will use market orders whereas participants who are price sensitive use limit orders. I tend to enter on market and exit on limit. Price drivers do run stop orders. However, it is more an effect of the stop orders being placed at the wrong place then a cause. Price drivers can only get paid when the market moves in their favor. Of course, a more passive form of price driver is the statistical arbitrage trader. The statistical arbitrager is more concerned with price rather then time and may prefer limit orders. Even so, they still need the market to move to make a profit.

 

Understanding the participants that trade in the market, their intentions, and how they make their profits explains various patterns that the market exhibits and clues one into where to look for opportunities. For example, trends on low volume are the understandable result of liquidity providers pulling out as the market moves against them and price drivers dominating. Trend exhaustion is seen as the combination of buyers filling all of their orders and liquidity providers re-entering the market, eventually encouraging new price drivers to enter in the opposite direction and new cycles to develop.

---------

Curtis

http://themarketpredictor.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
    • $SFM Sprouts Farmers Market stock bull flag continuation breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?SFM
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.