Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wsam29

What do you consider...

Recommended Posts

Anyone who holds a professional license designation, IE.. series 7, etc,etc.

 

Also, IMHO, anyone who derives their income for support from their successful trades ( A person who trades from home, but doesnt hold a license)

 

Regards, Knyyt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" Professional \Pro*fes"sion*al\, n.

 

A person who prosecutes anything professionally, or for a livelihood, and not in the character of an amateur; a professional worker."

 

 

A professional trader is:

 

- making money consistently (ie doing the job well)

- knowledgeable and competent

- not likely to be left behind by the vagaries and variations in the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone who holds a professional license designation, IE.. series 7, etc,etc.

 

Knyyt - being a professional trader has no correlation with a Series 7, 3, etc. I had my 7, 63, etc when I was a stockbroker and I couldn't trade if my life depended on it. I sold investments.

 

Getting a Series 7 or 3 is simply passing an exam(s). By passing this exam(s) there is no probability of success. While I was a broker I was also a trainer and mentor at my firm and there is no direct correlation between passing a test and being a good broker and/or trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of agree. I make the analogy between a car salesman and a race car driver.

 

A licensed person doesn't necessarily know the first thing about trading, and he may not even trade himself. It's a necessary credential to be a salesman.

 

Just cause you sell stocks (or futes etc.) doesn't make you a trader, let alone a professional trader.

 

The distinction between who is and isn't a "professional" trader is largely semantical of course.

 

One could argue that even a trader who trades very small size and has a full time job, but is methodical in his execution and has a solid, written out business plan , is being a professional trader.

 

Certainly I think one who makes a living trading is a professional, regardless of cert's or lack thereof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that a professional trader:

  • Derives their income and livelihood from trading
  • Treats trading as a business, not a hobby

Obviously those bullet points imply that you are trading money (yours and/or OPM) in such a way that you can live comfortably off the trading gains and that your business is structured in a way that makes the most legal and tax sense.

 

In the end, I think it's simply running your trading business as an actual business. And by that I mean you consult the proper attorneys, cpa's, etc on how to structure your business. The reason I say that is most 'non-pro' traders are never even going to get to this step due to losses and/or lack of desire.

 

To me, it's very easy to tell the difference between a pro vs. a non-pro. All you have to do is ask the right questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

when i am teaching traders, i emphasize the business plan and risk management aspects first and foremost.

 

most traders (retail/non-professionals) do not TREAT their trading like a business, and are thus not professional.

 

Every trade decision is a business decision. People who trade impulsively or without stops, are not being professionals. They are being gamblers, imo. (as a semantical distinction).

 

Trading is SO simple to do - fund an account with a few thousand, and then press buttons. But that is not how a professional approaches it.

 

Most businesses require much greater capital investment to start, and much more extensive hoops to jump through. I think this (as much as i hate govt. regulation btw) does give most business owners at least the proper mindset to some extent before they enter.

 

Another thing is that professionals keep RECORDS. They go over their past activity to see how they can improve, what they did wrong etc.

 

Non-professionals do not analyze their past trades in detail and usually do not keep extensive data on their activities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
a "professional" trader to be?

 

 

Probably someone who makes money at trading, or telling other people how to trade!

 

And, preferably, has some sort of professional designation to backup his or her bonafides, like CTA, Series 3, 7, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

following an occupation as a means of livelihood or for gain = professional

 

As all businesses can run at net income or loss at different times, throughout it's lifetime, I don't think making money has anything to do with the title itself...although if one consistently lost money over years, they would probably leave the profession and ultimately lose the job title 'professional trader'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.