Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jokerjoe

Continuous Contracts - To Adjust or Not?

Recommended Posts

I've been racking my brains trying to sort out back-adjusted data recently, none of the various data providers do it as I'd like them to. However I've been wondering if it's really necessary to back-adjust.

 

Yes - an adjusted series more accurately reflects a positions p&l. However I don't test mechanical systems, I'm more interested in support and resistance levels.

 

No - when a contract expires the price at that moment is good approximation for the spot price. In which case perhaps it makes more sense to just use the spot price. Two problems though. Firstly, the spot price may not be available (eg certain commodities). Secondly, volume is an integral part of my analysis.

 

I'd very much like to hear people's thoughts on the matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been racking my brains trying to sort out back-adjusted data recently, none of the various data providers do it as I'd like them to. However I've been wondering if it's really necessary to back-adjust.

 

Yes - an adjusted series more accurately reflects a positions p&l. However I don't test mechanical systems, I'm more interested in support and resistance levels.

 

No - when a contract expires the price at that moment is good approximation for the spot price. In which case perhaps it makes more sense to just use the spot price. Two problems though. Firstly, the spot price may not be available (eg certain commodities). Secondly, volume is an integral part of my analysis.

 

I'd very much like to hear people's thoughts on the matter.

 

Merged back-adjusted contracts accurately reflect high-to-low swings, so are an accurate representation of how far price actually moved in relation to a high or low. However, any data except that in the front-month contract will not show the actual price traded.

 

Merged non-back-adjusted contracts accurately reflect the actual prices traded, but are useless for high-to-low swing movement, so S/R levels will not be accurate, fibs will not be accurate, and so on.

 

Continuous contracts also reflect actual prices traded, but again, the high-to-low swing ratios are off, the further back in time you go. Each data vendor will construct a continuous contract in a different way so they are not identical.

 

The question is, what are you trying to achieve? Based on the above, determine the answer and go with that. Stuff like S/R only works because enough traders use it that it works, so use whatever others who trade what you're trying to accomplish will be using.

 

Just curious--what software and data provider do you use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... I'm mostly interested in where volume clusters, market profile/volume histogram concepts. I see what you're saying about the hi/low swings.

 

I use InvestorRT which doesn't have any c.c. management. Been using eSignal which doesn't have 3rd party adjusted data support, and also DTN which does but doesn't rollover certain commodities "properly" (using the front month when a further out contract is more liquid).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm... I'm mostly interested in where volume clusters, market profile/volume histogram concepts. I see what you're saying about the hi/low swings.

 

I use InvestorRT which doesn't have any c.c. management. Been using eSignal which doesn't have 3rd party adjusted data support, and also DTN which does but doesn't rollover certain commodities "properly" (using the front month when a further out contract is more liquid).

 

What do you mean about DTN which doesn't roll over properly? DTN doesn't "roll over" single month contracts. It like other data vendors, constructs a continuous contract (the "#" one) which is independent of time.

 

DTN has a contract for each month (or say quarterly if you mean the index futures). It doesn't do rollover. Your software must do that, and IRT does have a rollover function (I know, I used to use it). It does this only to remove the gaps (this is the "adjusting"), and thus shows correct high-low swings. DTN is not responsible for this, they have no concept of a "rollover".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find IRT rollover adjustment a hassle for multiple contracts and then you have added worries of not accidentally overwriting adjusted data with current data.

 

When constructing a c.c. you need to select which contracts to use and when to switch contracts, so I would argue that is not independent of time. I would like to switch when volume further out exceeds that of the front month, ie use the most liquid contract at the time. DTN frequently use the front month which isn't necessarily the most liquid. This is particularly noticeable in soft commodities, in their c.c. series there are periods of months with hardly any volume. This is not an issue they are unaware of as it's been discussed in their forums.

 

This is somewhat digressing from my original question...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I find IRT rollover adjustment a hassle for multiple contracts and then you have added worries of not accidentally overwriting adjusted data with current data.

 

When constructing a c.c. you need to select which contracts to use and when to switch contracts, so I would argue that is not independent of time. I would like to switch when volume further out exceeds that of the front month, ie use the most liquid contract at the time. DTN frequently use the front month which isn't necessarily the most liquid. This is particularly noticeable in soft commodities, in their c.c. series there are periods of months with hardly any volume. This is not an issue they are unaware of as it's been discussed in their forums.

 

This is somewhat digressing from my original question...

 

Perhaps there's a terminology difference we have here. DTN's "continuous contract" for ES is @ES# ... there's no month associated with it. It's this contract that will show inaccurate high to low swings over a longer period of time.

 

If you want to switch when volume shifts over, and so forth, then you need to manually roll over your own contracts. You do it either monthly or quarterly, and it should not take that long to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.