Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jokerjoe

Continuous Contracts - To Adjust or Not?

Recommended Posts

I've been racking my brains trying to sort out back-adjusted data recently, none of the various data providers do it as I'd like them to. However I've been wondering if it's really necessary to back-adjust.

 

Yes - an adjusted series more accurately reflects a positions p&l. However I don't test mechanical systems, I'm more interested in support and resistance levels.

 

No - when a contract expires the price at that moment is good approximation for the spot price. In which case perhaps it makes more sense to just use the spot price. Two problems though. Firstly, the spot price may not be available (eg certain commodities). Secondly, volume is an integral part of my analysis.

 

I'd very much like to hear people's thoughts on the matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been racking my brains trying to sort out back-adjusted data recently, none of the various data providers do it as I'd like them to. However I've been wondering if it's really necessary to back-adjust.

 

Yes - an adjusted series more accurately reflects a positions p&l. However I don't test mechanical systems, I'm more interested in support and resistance levels.

 

No - when a contract expires the price at that moment is good approximation for the spot price. In which case perhaps it makes more sense to just use the spot price. Two problems though. Firstly, the spot price may not be available (eg certain commodities). Secondly, volume is an integral part of my analysis.

 

I'd very much like to hear people's thoughts on the matter.

 

Merged back-adjusted contracts accurately reflect high-to-low swings, so are an accurate representation of how far price actually moved in relation to a high or low. However, any data except that in the front-month contract will not show the actual price traded.

 

Merged non-back-adjusted contracts accurately reflect the actual prices traded, but are useless for high-to-low swing movement, so S/R levels will not be accurate, fibs will not be accurate, and so on.

 

Continuous contracts also reflect actual prices traded, but again, the high-to-low swing ratios are off, the further back in time you go. Each data vendor will construct a continuous contract in a different way so they are not identical.

 

The question is, what are you trying to achieve? Based on the above, determine the answer and go with that. Stuff like S/R only works because enough traders use it that it works, so use whatever others who trade what you're trying to accomplish will be using.

 

Just curious--what software and data provider do you use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... I'm mostly interested in where volume clusters, market profile/volume histogram concepts. I see what you're saying about the hi/low swings.

 

I use InvestorRT which doesn't have any c.c. management. Been using eSignal which doesn't have 3rd party adjusted data support, and also DTN which does but doesn't rollover certain commodities "properly" (using the front month when a further out contract is more liquid).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm... I'm mostly interested in where volume clusters, market profile/volume histogram concepts. I see what you're saying about the hi/low swings.

 

I use InvestorRT which doesn't have any c.c. management. Been using eSignal which doesn't have 3rd party adjusted data support, and also DTN which does but doesn't rollover certain commodities "properly" (using the front month when a further out contract is more liquid).

 

What do you mean about DTN which doesn't roll over properly? DTN doesn't "roll over" single month contracts. It like other data vendors, constructs a continuous contract (the "#" one) which is independent of time.

 

DTN has a contract for each month (or say quarterly if you mean the index futures). It doesn't do rollover. Your software must do that, and IRT does have a rollover function (I know, I used to use it). It does this only to remove the gaps (this is the "adjusting"), and thus shows correct high-low swings. DTN is not responsible for this, they have no concept of a "rollover".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find IRT rollover adjustment a hassle for multiple contracts and then you have added worries of not accidentally overwriting adjusted data with current data.

 

When constructing a c.c. you need to select which contracts to use and when to switch contracts, so I would argue that is not independent of time. I would like to switch when volume further out exceeds that of the front month, ie use the most liquid contract at the time. DTN frequently use the front month which isn't necessarily the most liquid. This is particularly noticeable in soft commodities, in their c.c. series there are periods of months with hardly any volume. This is not an issue they are unaware of as it's been discussed in their forums.

 

This is somewhat digressing from my original question...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I find IRT rollover adjustment a hassle for multiple contracts and then you have added worries of not accidentally overwriting adjusted data with current data.

 

When constructing a c.c. you need to select which contracts to use and when to switch contracts, so I would argue that is not independent of time. I would like to switch when volume further out exceeds that of the front month, ie use the most liquid contract at the time. DTN frequently use the front month which isn't necessarily the most liquid. This is particularly noticeable in soft commodities, in their c.c. series there are periods of months with hardly any volume. This is not an issue they are unaware of as it's been discussed in their forums.

 

This is somewhat digressing from my original question...

 

Perhaps there's a terminology difference we have here. DTN's "continuous contract" for ES is @ES# ... there's no month associated with it. It's this contract that will show inaccurate high to low swings over a longer period of time.

 

If you want to switch when volume shifts over, and so forth, then you need to manually roll over your own contracts. You do it either monthly or quarterly, and it should not take that long to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 1st May 2024. Understanding the Implications of the FOMC Meeting. The FOMC will issue its post-meeting statement at 18:00 GMT tonight. “High-for-longer” is the expected outcome (but not higher) given more indications that progress on bringing inflation sustainably down to the 2% target has stalled out. With no new quarterly forecasts, it will be all about Chair Powell’s press conference when the Fed announces its policy stance tonight.   It is unlikely to be any more hawkish than what the markets are pricing in. Indeed, Chair Powell will have to acknowledge that the data are going the wrong way and he may even pre-empt the likely first question out of the box, “is a rate hike in the cards?” Meanwhile, Fed funds futures have not only fully priced out chances for a rate cut for this meeting and for June, but July as well. Risk for a reduction in September fell to below 50-50 on the initial spike in implied rates on the ECI news. The November contract reflects 20 bps in cuts, with a full quarter point easing now not seen until December. The FOMC is also expected to announce a slowing in Treasury runoff for June.   Economic Projections & Market Interpretation: The March update of the SEP revealed notable adjustments in key economic indicators. GDP forecasts for 2024 experienced a substantial upward revision, reflecting a more optimistic outlook with a growth rate of 2.1%, up from 1.4% in December. Similarly, projections for 2025 saw improvements, with the median jobless rate forecasts showing mixed trends but generally aligning with recent patterns. Expectations for headline and core PCE chain price indices also witnessed slight adjustments, indicating potential shifts in inflation dynamics. During the March meeting, the “dot plot” estimates hinted at a dovish stance by Fed members, with no indications of further rate hikes and median estimates suggesting potential rate cuts in 2024. This interpretation led markets to anticipate the initiation of quarterly rate cuts starting in June. As investors await the June SEP update, there is speculation about further adjustments in GDP estimates, PCE chain price indices, and the potential revision of rate cut expectations.   Analyzing the labor market reveals a complex picture of recovery and ongoing challenges. Payrolls have shown resilience in 2024, surpassing the previous year’s averages, albeit with variations across sectors. Despite improvements, the jobless rate remains a focal point, with fluctuations reflecting broader economic conditions. Additionally, metrics like the U-6 rate and wage growth provide insights into the labor market’s health and potential inflationary pressures.   Inflation Trends and Consumption Patterns: Inflation dynamics have been closely monitored, particularly amid recent fluctuations in commodity prices and supply chain disruptions. While recent CPI and PCE chain price measures suggest some moderation in inflationary pressures, concerns linger about the sustainability of these trends. The Fed’s attention to inflation remains paramount, shaping expectations for future policy actions. Consumer spending, a key driver of economic growth, has exhibited resilience despite ongoing uncertainties. Real personal consumption expenditures (PCE) have maintained positive growth rates, contributing to overall GDP expansion. However, shifts in consumption patterns and potential impacts on future economic performance warrant careful observation.   Market Expectations and Implications: As the FOMC meeting approaches, market participants are closely monitoring economic indicators and policy developments for insights into future market dynamics. The verbiage of the Fed statement and subsequent press briefing will be scrutinized for any hints regarding the timing of potential policy adjustments. Investors should remain vigilant and adaptable, considering the evolving economic landscape and its implications for investment strategies. The upcoming FOMC meeting holds significant implications for investors and economic stakeholders. Understanding recent economic developments, market expectations, and potential policy shifts is essential for navigating the dynamic financial environment. By staying informed and proactive, investors can position themselves to capitalize on emerging opportunities while managing risks effectively. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • $MRO Marathon Oil stock moving higher off the 27.57 support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?MRO
    • $SILK Silk Road Medical stock strong close, breakout watch , https://stockconsultant.com/?SILK
    • $ABSI Absci stock back to 4.68 support area with high trade quality, https://stockconsultant.com/?ABSI
    • $IOVA Iovance Biotherapeutics stock attempting to move higher off the 11.64 gap support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?IOVA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.