Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tradewinds

Intuition to Intentional Action

Recommended Posts

Today I came to the realization that I'd intuitively been trading a certain way, but could not define or explain it. This state was very frustrating to me. I could trade well, and immediately afterwards have absolutely no idea why I did well, and couldn't explain it to you if my life depended on it. That state does not give me confidence. I am an intuitive person, but I also have a hard time trusting what I don't consciously understand. Especially if it comes to a situation where there is substantial risk involved, like trading.

 

I realized that when I watch the price for exit cues, I do very well. But I didn't realize what I was doing. Basically I'm reading the price for exits, and using my indicators to determine what the trend is doing. I base entries on my indicators and use my indicators to anticipate what the trend is doing, but I base my exits on pure price action.

 

Then I realized that my indicators sometimes lag the price ladder. So price can take off, and my indicators don't show any reason for the price taking off. That doesn't happen all the time, but it happens often enough to make a significant difference in my decision making.

 

So there are times when I need to give price the priority, and times when I need to give my indicators, and my trend analysis the priority.

 

Again, I've realized that when I read pure price action for the exits, my trading is significantly better. I attribute it to some intuitive feel for when price is about to hit its' major profit potential. Now I want to consciously define what I'm intuitively sensing.

 

I've categorized some phases that seem to be part of the process of going from intuition to intentional action:

 

 

  • Enter into a certain state of mind (The "Zone")
  • Intuition
  • Discovery - Subconscious
  • Realization
  • Definition
  • Conscious Intentional Action

 

Some people may have no desire to go from intuition to the conscious realization of what they are intuitively doing. (E.g. Belief that traders are just "born". Can't be trained) So the journey would end there. I want to get to a disciplined and intentional conscious action.

 

What are your thoughts on the subject?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today I came to the realization that I'd intuitively been trading a certain way, but could not define or explain it. This state was very frustrating to me. I could trade well, and immediately afterwards have absolutely no idea why I did well, and couldn't explain it to you if my life depended on it. That state does not give me confidence. I am an intuitive person, but I also have a hard time trusting what I don't consciously understand. Especially if it comes to a situation where there is substantial risk involved, like trading.

 

I realized that when I watch the price for exit cues, I do very well. But I didn't realize what I was doing. Basically I'm reading the price for exits, and using my indicators to determine what the trend is doing. I base entries on my indicators and use my indicators to anticipate what the trend is doing, but I base my exits on pure price action.

 

Then I realized that my indicators sometimes lag the price ladder. So price can take off, and my indicators don't show any reason for the price taking off. That doesn't happen all the time, but it happens often enough to make a significant difference in my decision making.

 

So there are times when I need to give price the priority, and times when I need to give my indicators, and my trend analysis the priority.

 

Again, I've realized that when I read pure price action for the exits, my trading is significantly better. I attribute it to some intuitive feel for when price is about to hit its' major profit potential. Now I want to consciously define what I'm intuitively sensing.

 

I've categorized some phases that seem to be part of the process of going from intuition to intentional action:

 

 

  • Enter into a certain state of mind (The "Zone")
  • Intuition
  • Discovery - Subconscious
  • Realization
  • Definition
  • Conscious Intentional Action

 

Some people may have no desire to go from intuition to the conscious realization of what they are intuitively doing. (E.g. Belief that traders are just "born". Can't be trained) So the journey would end there. I want to get to a disciplined and intentional conscious action.

 

What are your thoughts on the subject?

 

Can I guess that your period of intuitive realization involved great entries or great exits?

 

Such spells of "intuition" lead to great trading streaks since the phenomenon helps you build confidence in yourself. Such periods also lead to over trading and giving it all back and leaving you with the realization that the period of intuition was really just a good and welcome run of luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Such periods also lead to over trading and giving it all back and leaving you with the realization that the period of intuition was really just a good and welcome run of luck.

 

Definitely. You are right. That's why we need to take it to the next step and consciously understand what we were doing right. Otherwise we can degrade and regress, or like you said, it may have been just a streak of luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps it is not so much intuition, but that different methods for entries and exits are the key to successful trading.

 

For example: an exhaustion candle (with big volume after a climatic uptrend etc.) could be a very good price action sign to get out of a trade very near the top.

 

On the other hand it is not necessarily a good price action sign to go short, because before the trend reverses prices could go a little bit higher still, and / or consolidate for a long time.

 

So for an exit of a profitable trade this would be very good, but for starting a new one it could stop you out, whipsaw you or need a very big SL leaving you with poor risk/reward ratios.

 

Using more lagging information (indicators... etc) for entries into a reliable new trend makes perfect sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I attribute it to some intuitive feel for when price is about to hit its' major profit potential. Now I want to consciously define what I'm intuitively sensing.

 

What are your thoughts on the subject?

 

I think you are going about things in exactly the opposite direction as you should be. Try to cultivate your intuition. This may fly in the face of the vendors who want to sell you a "system" that can be traded by anyone, but ask any long-term successful trader to write a series of steps that a new trader can follow (like, specifics, not generalities like "cut your losses short") to achieve repeatable success, and it's obvious that it can't be done. Ask Paul Tudor Jones or some other successful trader how they do what they do, and I guarantee you they will not have a series of specific steps you can follow, otherwise they would just duplicate themselves and retire. Or, if they did write steps, following them to the letter would NOT produce the same results. Intuition based on experience in any field is what separates the really successful from the mediocre.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you are going about things in exactly the opposite direction as you should be. Try to cultivate your intuition. This may fly in the face of the vendors who want to sell you a "system" that can be traded by anyone, but ask any long-term successful trader to write a series of steps that a new trader can follow (like, specifics, not generalities like "cut your losses short") to achieve repeatable success, and it's obvious that it can't be done. Ask Paul Tudor Jones or some other successful trader how they do what they do, and I guarantee you they will not have a series of specific steps you can follow, otherwise they would just duplicate themselves and retire. Or, if they did write steps, following them to the letter would NOT produce the same results. Intuition based on experience in any field is what separates the really successful from the mediocre.

 

Yes, you are right. Intuition is extremely important, especially with the type of trading that I'm focused on, which is scalping. I don't have time to analyze 100% of the inputs, every split second, and think about what to do. I'm making split second decisions on the exits. There is no time for much more that an intuitive feel for what the price action is doing.

 

You bring up a great point about traders duplicating themselves. Maybe that's one aspect of people trying to automate their trading, or the name "bots" (robots).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.