Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

After trading a little less than two years (just getting my feet wet), I'm beginning to take a step back from the TA, price action, patterns, MP etc., and find myself asking the age-old question - what moves prices?

At the macro level I understand there are several factors that include fundamental and technical, that drive price changes; however, at the micro level, is it unadulterated and pure supply-demand?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After trading a little less than two years (just getting my feet wet), I'm beginning to take a step back from the TA, price action, patterns, MP etc., and find myself asking the age-old question - what moves prices?

At the macro level I understand there are several factors that include fundamental and technical, that drive price changes; however, at the micro level, is it unadulterated and pure supply-demand?

 

I can give you my opinion with respect to trading the EMINI markets but I am almost positive that the same concepts apply to other instruments.

price moves up when there is lack of sellers at a level or the sellers at that level were hit.

i.e. lets assume that an instrument is trading at 100 and 101, 100 being the bid and 101 the ask. there are 1000 units waiting to be filled at 101 and 900 at 100

 

101 - 1000 (ask)

900 - 100 (bid)

 

if 600 units are bought at the ask + 400 are pulled (sellers decided not to sell), price will move one level up.

if 900 units are sold to the bid and no other bids appear, price will move one level down.

each level has its own discovery phase.

Edited by aversano

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After trading a little less than two years (just getting my feet wet), I'm beginning to take a step back from the TA, price action, patterns, MP etc., and find myself asking the age-old question - what moves prices?

At the macro level I understand there are several factors that include fundamental and technical, that drive price changes; however, at the micro level, is it unadulterated and pure supply-demand?

 

ninja, do you watch the DOM very often? I would encourage you to study the DOM on something relatively slow like ES with lots of contracts, along with opening a level 2 window, and get a visual of the resting limit orders at each price level.

 

I am new to trading and this has helped me tremendously in just getting an idea for how the order book works. While orders can be pulled at any time before they get filled, I visualize that a "strong" level (say, 4000 offer contracts at a known resistance level) will require a very strong market buy activity to "eat through" the contracts. Again, it happens all the time that these orders get pulled, but it helps me to think of a level with lots of contracts as a "thick wall" that must be penetrated (albeit a fickle one that can disappear instantly), and a small number of orders at a level (say, under a thousand on ES) much more "thin" which can be broken through quickly by convicted market activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ninja, do you watch the DOM very often? I would encourage you to study the DOM on something relatively slow like ES with lots of contracts, along with opening a level 2 window, and get a visual of the resting limit orders at each price level.

 

I am new to trading and this has helped me tremendously in just getting an idea for how the order book works. While orders can be pulled at any time before they get filled, I visualize that a "strong" level (say, 4000 offer contracts at a known resistance level) will require a very strong market buy activity to "eat through" the contracts. Again, it happens all the time that these orders get pulled, but it helps me to think of a level with lots of contracts as a "thick wall" that must be penetrated (albeit a fickle one that can disappear instantly), and a small number of orders at a level (say, under a thousand on ES) much more "thin" which can be broken through quickly by convicted market activity.

 

If only things were that simple....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If only things were that simple....

 

Tell me about it--but I just mean that watching the DOM has helped me develop a clearer picture of how price can move. Doesn't mean I can trade using it or that it's helpful to me otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do watch the DOM regularly (at least whenever I trade), mostly to watch for breakouts. However, given the advent of HFT and the resultant loss of tradeable information in the Level II, I'm not sure L2 is very useful anymore. My understanding is that orders submitted by HFT engines are often Fill-Or-Kill (FOK), Iceberg or completely hidden which takes away from the information content of the order book.

Although Aversano's reply makes logical sense, I'm not sure that is the behavior I've been seeing in light sweet crude. Oftentimes in spite of 'thin' resistance (borrowing joshdance's term), prices will fall back ('reverse' if you will) even if no fundamental news is publicly available. Therefore my question - does price move merely based on supply/demand. Am I not seeing something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.