Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

sdpercussion

Stocks or Futures for Day Trading (Not the Same Old Which is "better")

Recommended Posts

Hello There,

This is my first post and I would like to start off by saying thank you to anyone who takes the time to consider my questions. I am currently a swing trader with about a years worth of experience. I am very familiar with TA concepts as well as money/risk management. What I do not have is years and years of hands on experience. I aspire to become a day trader but was thinking of switching to futures to avoid (not to be impatiant, Im just not a very rich person) having to wait untill my account size meets pattern day trading rules.

 

My style of trading relies heavily on volume. The guys over at TodayTrader (not a plug) have been a big inspiration. To over-simplify, They among many other things have alerts coming through when stocks are making highs or are running up on heavy volume (they use Trade-Ideas). They will then either jump on board this momentum or find sympathy plays (again this is a very simple description of their methods). In any case I have found that wheather entering on a breakout, pullback or sympathy play if there isnt a lot of volume you might want to pass up the trade. So, these guys will screen a universe of stocks basically using volume to generate trade ideas in real-time. This doesnt mean to trade just because of a volume spike but rather volume is your main confirming indicator and the fuel for momentum, the more the better.

 

So...

 

1. Do you think that by limiting yourself to a few intruments (like trading a couple of different futures) rather than screening a universe of stocks for higher quality opportunities like the guys at Todaytrader do would put me at a disadvantage?

 

2. I feel like with trading stocks you have many more choices to find the "right" trades and by trading futures you will be forced to trade mediocre opportunities to avoid sitting on the sidelines all the time. Agree/disagree?

 

3. Many traders say that it is much easier focusing on a small number of instruments, such as trading 1 or 2 indexes but I would think that this forces you to trade through a lot of "chop". Where as with stocks you could just look elsewhere for a better opportunity (ie. whatever sectors/stocks the volume is flowing into using a scanner like Trade-Ideas)

 

4. I use Tradestation and I see that I can add data feeds for many different futures (indexes, agri, curreny, metals). Might this be the solution to my concerns or would I be getting myself into trouble trading commodities that I have no experience with the fundamental factors that effect price? I trade on technicals but I don't want to get stopped out of a trade everytime it rains in Florida...

 

I know this was a loaded post and I appreciate any comments!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SDP,

To get to the core issues which are only a few let me say this:

I personally am a brilliant stock position trader and a mediocre to sometimes lousy futures trader while being a very competent analyst .

 

What makes the difference : 1. Leverage , I trade stocks with my money and no margin. This helps.

2. The more trades you take in and out the higher the costs , slippage and %ge of errors.

3. Noise can have a disastrous effect on leveraged futures accounts.

So it is a misconception to prefer Futures because you streamline the knowledge and information overload because you pay for it dearly . Also daytrading has seen many a good trader come to grief.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ditto to what Coogee says.

Plus I would add that stocks often have a lot more interesting things happening in them; eg; corporate actions, market and sector drivers.

Plus to a certain extent - even though i am not a fundamentals person. Yuo can to a certain extent put a reasonable idea of value on a stock with a limited number of shares available.

when it comes to most futures, value seems to go out the window for a very long time..... good if you are a trend trader. :)

Have a great NY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Do you think that by limiting yourself to a few intruments (like trading a couple of different futures) rather than screening a universe of stocks for higher quality opportunities like the guys at Todaytrader do would put me at a disadvantage?

 

As a trader that focuses on a few futures, I do not think you are at any disadvantage. You will learn your market(s) and start to get a feel for what is normal.

 

2. I feel like with trading stocks you have many more choices to find the "right" trades and by trading futures you will be forced to trade mediocre opportunities to avoid sitting on the sidelines all the time. Agree/disagree?

 

Disagree. 1) You will have to develop a reliable screener that screens stocks in real-time (which then means developing a scanner that works). 2) As I said, you will get a feel for a market(s) and learn it's tendencies.

 

3. Many traders say that it is much easier focusing on a small number of instruments, such as trading 1 or 2 indexes but I would think that this forces you to trade through a lot of "chop". Where as with stocks you could just look elsewhere for a better opportunity (ie. whatever sectors/stocks the volume is flowing into using a scanner like Trade-Ideas)

 

I'm not sure you are forced to trade chop, that's dependent on your trading methodology. If you feel the need to trade for the sake of trading, then you may get caught into some chopping areas. With the stocks you are back to having a scanner that is consistent b/c there's no way you can manually flip through potentially thousands of charts.

 

4. I use Tradestation and I see that I can add data feeds for many different futures (indexes, agri, curreny, metals). Might this be the solution to my concerns or would I be getting myself into trouble trading commodities that I have no experience with the fundamental factors that effect price? I trade on technicals but I don't want to get stopped out of a trade everytime it rains in Florida...

 

You should never trade anything - futures or stocks - w/o first watching a market(s) and learning how it moves. You should also know what can impact a market. Stocks can be impacted by unexpected news, commodities can be affected by unexpected events such as storms, etc.

 

All markets will be affected by unexpected events so you have to prepare for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.