Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dsalas

Spread Betting a Scam

Recommended Posts

Something is very clear throughout this thread: people think that spread-betting firms are 'taking the other side of their trades'. This isn't true. A spread-betting firm takes the same trade as you in the underlying market***. This is hedging, and is how they lock in their profit from the spread - taking the other side of your bet wouldn't be - it would be gambling.

 

Here are two simple examples:

 

1) You buy at 100 and pay a 3 pip spread.

2) The spread betting firm buys at 100 and pays a 1 pip spread.

3) The market rallies and you exit at 110.

4) The spread betting firm also exits at 110.

5) The spread betting firm uses their 10 pip profit to pay you your 10 pip profit, leaving them with a 2 pip profit from the spread.

 

1) You buy at 100 and pay a 3 pip spread.

2) The spread betting firm buys at 100 and pays a 1 pip spread.

3) The market sells off and you exit at 90.

4) The spread betting firm also exits at 90.

5) The spread betting firm has a 10 pip loss, but this is covered by the 10 pip loss from your account, leaving them with a 2 pip profit from the spread.

 

They are hedging to lock in numerous small, secure profits from the spread. It is this steady stream of guaranteed (while ever they have customers) profits that has made them wealthy and successful, not gambling against you.

 

Spread-betting companies don't care whether you win or lose - they get their money either way - just like a normal broker who gets their commission regardless.

 

*** A spreadbetting firm doesn't actually take the same trade as you. They don't look at individual positions and hedge them because the SB position size is at the discretion of the customer, whereas the contract size for the underlying market is fixed by the exchange.

 

Spreadbetting firms simply have a risk management desk that looks at net exposure across all their customer's accounts (I know this for a fact; I have sat at that desk).

 

Hope that's helpful.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I have a couple of clients in the UK who do spread betting. I'm still a bit foggy on the details but it sounds fundamentally different from the bucket shops in the Forex.

 

Sounds as if the SB firms have a nest on the ground...win when they win and win when they lose!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a couple of clients in the UK who do spread betting. I'm still a bit foggy on the details but it sounds fundamentally different from the bucket shops in the Forex.

 

Sounds as if the SB firms have a nest on the ground...win when they win and win when they lose!

 

Hi Roger

 

Spread Betting has pros and cons, like anything else.

 

If you want to advise your customers without needing to know the ins and outs, then I would steer them away from spreadbetting for daytrading - there are simple mathematical reasons why they are unlikely to overcome their execution costs, regardless of how good your tuition is. For longer term trading, spreadbetting is perfectly viable, though still carries similar risks to DMA forms of derivative trading like futures.

 

Finally, because of how the spread affects trade entry (and assuming you train traders using futures), your students need to know to factor in the SB spread when emulating your positions (ie if you enter with a ten tick stop in the YM, and they're trading via a spreadbetting firm quoting a two tick spread, their stop loss needs to be 12 and their target needs to be 8, in order for their position to reflect yours accurately).

 

Hope that's helpful,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your posts bluehorseshoe, very useful information. when trading shares as opposed to indices, they also charge a trading fee on top of the spread which can affect your ability to get in and out of trades with a quick profit.

 

they can be used to hedge a trade too, if you have, or purchase actual stocks, it can be useful to short a percentage via spreadbetting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks for your posts bluehorseshoe, very useful information. when trading shares as opposed to indices, they also charge a trading fee on top of the spread which can affect your ability to get in and out of trades with a quick profit.

 

they can be used to hedge a trade too, if you have, or purchase actual stocks, it can be useful to short a percentage via spreadbetting.

 

Hi Banksy,

 

Glad you found the posts useful.

 

I've never traded stocks or spread-bet them, but I am aware that the pricing structure is a little more complicated (I think they adjust price quotes for dividends and things, don't they?). I believe the fee structure (spread) is based on the liquidity of the underlying market which, for exotic instruments and thinly traded stocks may be low. This reflects the difficulties they may encounter in mimicing your position in the underlying.

 

Though I have seen absolutely no firm evidence for this, I have been told that a number of smaller UK hedge funds use spread-betting. As I can't imagine that this is their primary method of trading (it would hardly be credible for a hedge fund), then I think that they maybe use spreadbetting as a means to hedge positions, as you suggest.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Though I have seen absolutely no firm evidence for this, I have been told that a number of smaller UK hedge funds use spread-betting. As I can't imagine that this is their primary method of trading (it would hardly be credible for a hedge fund), then I think that they maybe use spreadbetting as a means to hedge positions, as you suggest.

 

As a hedge fund if you want leverage and shorting abilities you generally require a prime broker of sorts, and a lot of the larger prime brokers dont even look at you unless you have X millions. If you are required to replicate a portfolio approach then maybe a spread better is necessary when you are starting up and dont have the cash. (it does seem an expensive way to do things - however "everything is negotiable")

I cannot imagine you could not do most things through a normal broker like Interactive brokers without the spread costs, and sticking within normal leverage amounts....however as I understand it pretty much every trade in the UK stocks is a spread bet/swap trade anyway due to stamp duty. (not my area of expertise so would need to investigate further.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As a hedge fund if you want leverage and shorting abilities you generally require a prime broker of sorts, and a lot of the larger prime brokers dont even look at you unless you have X millions. If you are required to replicate a portfolio approach then maybe a spread better is necessary when you are starting up and dont have the cash. (it does seem an expensive way to do things - however "everything is negotiable")

I cannot imagine you could not do most things through a normal broker like Interactive brokers without the spread costs, and sticking within normal leverage amounts....however as I understand it pretty much every trade in the UK stocks is a spread bet/swap trade anyway due to stamp duty. (not my area of expertise so would need to investigate further.)

 

The person who told me this stated that they (the SB firm) were 'only allowed to deal with small funds'. I asked what counted as 'small', and was told 'up to ten million'.

 

Of course, this was someone in institutional sales who told me this, so it could of course be complete nonsense designed to assert the credibility of the firm.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.