Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

The Ebullio Commodity Fund - Feb 2010 Commentary

Recommended Posts

I found this at ET and thought it was an interesting read. Attached is a PDF from The Ebullio Commodity Fund which just went through a huge drawdown.

 

While one could just laugh at them, I think we can all learn lessons from the pros. Yes, they would be considered a 'pro' although it may come into question after this.

 

I think it stresses just how important money management and risk management is, regardless of the size of your trades. You have to sit back and wonder - how on Earth did they allow these losses over the last 2 months become so large? We may never know the full story, but something should have set off some alarms at some point I would think.

ebullio feb 2010.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised they're still open for business. I wish their "transparency" included exactly what went wrong: how their risk metrics failed, why they were so directional, what kind of leverage they were using, and how they will adjust their strategy so this never happens again.

 

Their returns looks as if they've been short premium, and a few deep OTM positions got hit, but it says their losses are directional. Anyone have further insights into what their trading strategy is/was?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it goes to show how complicated risk management really is. It's not, "I will only lose X per position." Simply because there are so many other factors at play, and chances are they were playing around with various and futures contracts and something hit them hard.

 

Also, from the sounds of their last paragraphs it seems they take large bets that feel more 2008 then 2010. They almost sound stuck between that, what we think markets should do and what they really are doing. But it's hard to tell from just a brochure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it goes to show how complicated risk management really is. It's not, "I will only lose X per position." Simply because there are so many other factors at play, and chances are they were playing around with various and futures contracts and something hit them hard.

 

Also, from the sounds of their last paragraphs it seems they take large bets that feel more 2008 then 2010. They almost sound stuck between that, what we think markets should do and what they really are doing. But it's hard to tell from just a brochure.

 

Does it really need to complicated though James? One could argue you have a point at which you are wrong and should exit the trade - not turn it into an investment or long-term position.

 

At the very, very least - an oh sh*t stop loss could have been used to prevent a drawdown like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does it really need to complicated though James? One could argue you have a point at which you are wrong and should exit the trade - not turn it into an investment or long-term position.

 

At the very, very least - an oh sh*t stop loss could have been used to prevent a drawdown like this.

 

Oh absolutely I agree with you, but they claimed to be using options in which case it is more complicated then losing X amount. They claimed their options "hedge" didn't work as well as planned - which tells me they probably didn't really understand what they were doing to begin with - or they did but they ignored the potential implosion.

 

I don't know how big this trade was or what they were tied up in, but someone obviously missed something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh absolutely I agree with you, but they claimed to be using options in which case it is more complicated then losing X amount. They claimed their options "hedge" didn't work as well as planned - which tells me they probably didn't really understand what they were doing to begin with - or they did but they ignored the potential implosion.

 

I don't know how big this trade was or what they were tied up in, but someone obviously missed something.

 

Gotcha.

 

Yeah I didn't understand how the 'hedge' didn't really hedge. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From my understanding, the options were just a "worst case" measure, and were placed way too far out. So basically, they opted for cheap options (thinking there's pretty much no chance their main position will go that much south), which didn't do a good job covering them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90% drawdown.

 

Graphs that look like a 3rd grader made them.

 

Only to be comforted in the end by a crappy quote from a little seen movie with a cheesy movie poster.

 

I am sure their customers are re-assured at their ongoing strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
90% drawdown.

 

Graphs that look like a 3rd grader made them.

 

Only to be comforted in the end by a crappy quote from a little seen movie with a cheesy movie poster.

 

I am sure their customers are re-assured at their ongoing strategy.

 

You'd be surprised how many garbage hedge funds are out there. Something has to make up all those fund of funds...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.