Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Goldman Sachs Code for Auto Trading Stolen

Recommended Posts

The link is to a story of Stolen code -

 

http://www.bloomberg.com:80/apps/news?pid=email_en&sid=axYw_ykTBokE

 

According to the story the code:

 

"The proprietary code lets the firm do “sophisticated, high- speed and high-volume trades on various stock and commodities markets,” prosecutors said in court papers. The trades generate “many millions of dollars” each year."

 

A little bit of understanding of how such systems operate is the basis for the "Intensity of Commercial Trade" indicator that we have discussed on this forum. This article accurately describes the trading our indicator was built to spot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GATA Urges SEC, CFTC to Investigate Goldman Sachs' Trading Program

 

MANCHESTER, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee has urged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to investigate the computer trading program of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. that, according to a federal prosecutor, the bank acknowledges can be used to manipulate markets.

 

In its letters to the SEC and CFTC, GATA wrote: "The assistant U.S. attorney's comment can be construed to suggest Goldman Sachs considers its own manipulation of markets to be fair, while such manipulation by others would be unfair..."

 

GATA Urges SEC, CFTC to Investigate Goldman Sachs' Trading Program - Yahoo! Finance

 

GATA is an educational and civil rights organization that seeks to restore free markets to the precious metals.

 

The text of GATA's letters is appended.

 

GOLD ANTI-TRUST ACTION COMMITTEE INC.

7 Villa Louisa Road, Manchester, Connecticut 06043-7541

 

July 7, 2009

 

Gary Gensler, Chairman

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

3 Lafayette Centre

1155 21st St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

 

Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F St. N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

Dear Chairman Gensler / Dear Chairman Schapiro:

 

I'm enclosing a copy of a report distributed July 6 by Bloomberg News Service about the U.S. government's prosecution of a former employee of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. involving the purported theft of a Goldman Sachs computer trading program. The report quotes Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Facciponti as saying in U.S. District Court in New York City: "The bank has raised the possibility that there is a danger that somebody who knew how to use this program could use it to manipulate markets in unfair ways."

 

If the report quotes the assistant U.S. attorney correctly, and if he was characterizing Goldman Sachs' position correctly, then Goldman Sachs claims to have possession of a computer trading program that can manipulate markets. The assistant U.S. attorney's comment can be construed to suggest Goldman Sachs considers its own manipulation of markets to be fair, while such manipulation by others would be unfair.

 

The court proceeding described in the Bloomberg News story would seem to impugn all markets in which Goldman Sachs trades. On behalf of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc., I ask your commission to investigate Goldman Sachs' trading program urgently and report its findings publicly.

 

Thanks for your consideration.

 

With good wishes.

 

CHRIS POWELL

Secretary/Treasurer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to see a copy of the report, there seems to be some baloney being spouted here. You don't require software to 'manipulate markets' though of course if you are buying and selling in many different markets simultaneously it will make life easier. I smell BS.

 

I guess it depends on your definition of 'manipulate' really. The general definition is to manage or utilise skillfully. The alternative definition adds by unfair means. It's an emotive word, presumably carefully chosen. If you are working a large order your job is to 'manipulate the market' to get the best average price you can. Is high speed statistical arbitrage manipulation?

 

I can't see how a piece of software can add 'unfair means'. Unless it exploits 'shortcomings' of the exchange. Slicing and dicing, choping and changing hardly constitute unfair.

 

EDIT: my favourite quote ‘Preposterous’

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd like to see a copy of the report, there seems to be some baloney being spouted here. You don't require software to 'manipulate markets' though of course if you are buying and selling in many different markets simultaneously it will make life easier. I smell BS.

 

I guess it depends on your definition of 'manipulate' really. The general definition is to manage or utilise skillfully. The alternative definition adds by unfair means. It's an emotive word, presumably carefully chosen. If you are working a large order your job is to 'manipulate the market' to get the best average price you can. Is high speed statistical arbitrage manipulation?

 

I can't see how a piece of software can add 'unfair means'. Unless it exploits 'shortcomings' of the exchange. Slicing and dicing, choping and changing hardly constitute unfair.

 

EDIT: my favourite quote ‘Preposterous’

 

BlowFish,

 

The missing component here is time frame. Very short term manipulation of price happens everyday in almost all major markets and a lot of it is done by software.

 

Almost 30 years ago I sat in a trading room were all kinds of ultra short term smaller size actions were taken to facilitate much larger size entries or exits.

 

Today the old "fill-em-up and shut-em-up" or "Sell a few higher to buy a much bigger amount lower" is done by very fast, very sophisticated software that always knows 1) market depth at all levels 2) recent price action 3) the mission - to acquire or distribute x contracts over y price range in z time.

 

Certainly when a huge buyer sells to drive price lower so that he can buy more is price manipulation. It has gone on forever, will always be and today, is best done with software.

 

With the speed of today's markets longer term manipulation requires much greater resources and involves much more risk. Why not just keep the risk down and let your software shave a bit everyday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clearly Urma you have some serious kung fu knowledge of neural networks etc.

 

I'm curious to know if how your group has trained something for DOM analysis when at extremes and S&R?

 

Cheers and big it up.

 

Thank you for the kind words.

 

Here is a link to a thread I posted on why we feel that market depth, while useful for execution information, is worthless as an indicator/input.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/why-market-depth-useless-indicator-5501.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it is OK for GS to manipulate markets but not anyone else. Quite frankly it is pathetic of them to even start complaining that someone has used unfair tactics (although illegal) to gain something from them when they are using unfair tactics (although legal) in the same way in my view.

 

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlowFish,

 

The missing component here is time frame. Very short term manipulation of price happens everyday in almost all major markets and a lot of it is done by software.

 

Almost 30 years ago I sat in a trading room were all kinds of ultra short term smaller size actions were taken to facilitate much larger size entries or exits.

 

Today the old "fill-em-up and shut-em-up" or "Sell a few higher to buy a much bigger amount lower" is done by very fast, very sophisticated software that always knows 1) market depth at all levels 2) recent price action 3) the mission - to acquire or distribute x contracts over y price range in z time.

 

Certainly when a huge buyer sells to drive price lower so that he can buy more is price manipulation. It has gone on forever, will always be and today, is best done with software.

 

With the speed of today's markets longer term manipulation requires much greater resources and involves much more risk. Why not just keep the risk down and let your software shave a bit everyday?

 

Indeed. The point is that manipulate is an emotive word that is ambiguous in so far as it has two definitions.

 

I would bet pennies to pounds that the algorithms they are worried about are ones that operate in multiple markets and multiple instruments either looking for convergent trades or other 'zero' (haha LTCM!) risk arb type trades. Of course returns are small on these so huge positions must be taken. This is where the relatively simple bit occurs. Grabbing as much liquidity as possible whilst the opportunity remains. Obviously algorithms can help here but that is not the big deal. In other words it's the algorithms that decide what to pile in to not the algorithms that do the piling that are the golden goose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some serious speculation going on here:

 

Daily Kos: State of the Nation

 

Summary:

Goldman Sachs may just possibly have used security access codes and built a system to acquire trading information PRIOR to transaction_commit time points at NYSE.

 

The profitability of this split-second information advantage would have been and could have been extraordinary. Observed yielding profits at $100,000,000 a day.

 

 

But I'm a layman, can't verify anything of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.