Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Current look at the ES (15 minute and 240 minute) has me tempted to add a few longs on a break up and hold ... on the 15 minute, the red rectangle represents a small area of nearby minor resistance, where a break up could find itself stopped cold, for now. Again, while a pullback, even one of some extent, could occur at any time, I beleive PA favors at lest a test of the prior break down zone (around 1024 or so) prior to resuming the down trend, if the down trend is indeed in tact.

 

For what its worth, I had been expecting a retest of the March 2009 low, or even a break to lower lows, after the rally off that low finished. PA over the last few weeks has me much less certain that such a retest will occur, and I tend to think that I need to keep my mind open to the possibility that the Big Bad Bear it truly over, and that we are in fact in the early stages of an ere where buy, hold, and forget about it may actually prove a profitable strategy. Of course, that will become most clear at the end of such an era. But right now, I had been expecting to see the reawakening of a full grown hibernating bear. But when I blink, I sometimes think I am seeing the birth of a baby bull.

 

Anything can happen, of course. I am open to all possibilities.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

PS I thought I had taken a pic of the 15 minute prior to the breakout, but I hadn't.

5aa70fd729a25_2010-02-22ES1.thumb.jpg.eb1217bcc3d75e725c91c6951a03f01b.jpg

5aa70fd72ef31_2010-02-22ES2.thumb.jpg.34c777a5ee6dbb4b5f900783117f51ac.jpg

5aa70fd733c97_2010-02-22ES15minute1.thumb.jpg.c74cb32269c6d1c07f73f0738f893455.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the 1440 minute CL showing the prior day's high&low. Price is for the second time today trading above the prior day's high (the orange and blue candles are due to my currency trading friend - he and I have been working together on this CL project, and he uses these colors on his charts, so I have adopted them for my CL chart).

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd7389d1_2010-02-22CLDailyPriorHighsLows1.thumb.jpg.0332a651958e98a5e6dbdde2c93111fd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EURUSD/6E is at a level within a zone of some signficance and I would expect a trade that trends away from that level at some point today ...

 

Current view of the EURUSD/6E shows a long sequence in the making as price probed below the level line and rallied. The proposed stop loss may change based upon the depth of this pullback...

 

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd743205_2010-02-226E3.thumb.jpg.f2aac8fac800a4f68673ab31407447b3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EUR/USD not Short, comes down too fast

 

Thales, did you consider the 123 Short ?

 

I saw the short sequence, but I did not trade it, as the immediately preceding rally looked impulsive, the short sequence corrective. It would have been PT1 and holding for PT2 with a BE stop. Ahhh ... hindsight ...

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19492&stc=1&d=1266855713

 

 

 

At any rate, had the short sequence offered itself from levels closer to the HOD, I'd have taken it. Even with that decline off of that sequence, I am viewing this choppy decline off the HOD as a corrective phase, so my preference goes to longs

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd7573dd_2010-02-226Ethelongandshortofit2.thumb.jpg.66a54d233b907b2162a21c751cde3974.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very tight and choppy trade all session. Yesterdays lack of news clearly influenced this choppy nature. Nothing to do yesterday and proud of it. I continue to look towards the short side for more continuation today.

 

Only longs to be had will be scalps unless there is a very very clear capitulation. Should it capitulate I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we trade the recent multi-day range low and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

The obvious short to look for is in the recent multi-day range low area, ideally in the 1.5660 - 1.5620 area. Shorts there will be aiming for a new low but will be out of 1/2 before making that new low. I'll attempt to trail the other 1/2 with successive LHs from the 60 min chart. Alternatively, can take obvious shorts above 1.5490 area and manage them slightly more aggressive in the beginning with 1/4 off before 1.5450 trades, 1/4 off around 1.5410 area and trail the other 1/2 with successive LHs on the 60m chart.

MK_2010-02-23_115252.thumb.png.1f5ce86ef5b5ed06e1d64f91f65ca88c.png

MK_2010-02-23_115345.thumb.png.4772ee8d78597dcb3f4aa56d79ca5223.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What does YH in the chart stand for?

 

Thanks

Brian

 

MK is correct. The abbreviations are

YH / YL -- yesterdays high / low

ZH / ZL -- day before yesterday high / low

2H / 2L -- two day high / low, including today

3H / 3L -- three day high / low, including today

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EUR/USD above Thursday's high

 

Thales' long idea was right.

 

ACD method has a huge stop today.

Nice continuation signal for trend followers in 15m chart.

 

Too steep or fast for a long continuation through the ACD level, should consolidate first.

tl-01.thumb.png.56e1533352302631cca54e817264f821.png

tl-02.thumb.png.159cdfe66afe4aed49bf8f52e1fee9c6.png

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am viewing this choppy decline off the HOD as a corrective phase, so my preference goes to longs...

 

My long from 1.3607 proceeded to both profit targets. The atached chart shows that long from yesterday. It also shows a short sequence that occurred for the benefit of our European friends. I was asleep at the time, hece I denoted that trade in dotted lines to indicate that for me it "twas but a dream ..." A t the right hand edge, there is a long sequence with a buy point of 1.3585 for which I was just filled (a quick look at the DOM shows 85/87 bid-offer as I hit the submit button). Not entirely enthralled with this one. That was quite a plummit from the highs, and it looks like price needs at least a re-test of the low, if not a new session low altogether in order to clear this thing for a decent rally, but, if I were to sit this out on that basis, I may miss a +4R trade. It's only going to cost me -1R to find out, so I'm in.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19519&stc=1&d=1266930319

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd867dcf_2010-02-236E1.thumb.jpg.1ea624694c5b1ac98ce0b87543eff636.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... if I were to sit this out on that basis, I may miss a +4R trade. It's only going to cost me -1R to find out, so I'm in.

 

It will cost you at most 1R but more than likely, less than 1R :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding spike like reaction from the obvious R (on the 60m). I continue to favour the short side, especially as that test of obvious R resulted in such a fierce sell response spending very little time in that area.

 

Only longs to be had will be scalps unless there is a very very clear capitulation. Should it capitulate I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we trade the recent multi-day range low and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

Obvious shorts above 1.5460 - 1.5490 with the aim of being out of 1/2 before making a new low for the year and trail the other 1/2 as per LHs on the 60m chart.

MK_2010-02-24_104946.thumb.png.f48ac3cee2eb6bb248123ddcb12e58bd.png

MK_2010-02-24_105156.thumb.png.20210c704064c4cc523a96ccd0b8a9b5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It will cost you at most 1R but more than likely, less than 1R

 

A little less than 1/4R to find out - sometimes it is very clear that it is time to pull the rip cord.

 

I've been going back over the Linda Raschke seminar material again over the last few weeks, and one line that must have resonated with me at the time is this: "The trade must move in your favor right away. Sideways is not an acceptable response."

 

Well, if I'm long, and if sideways is not acceptable, then down is an absolute no-no!

 

I did call Linda's office, and it seems that she has no plans at this time to offer her seminar again. Too bad - it is a wonderful, wonderful learning experience. I have always said I am a most unoriginal trader - everything I do that works I learned from someone else. Going through her seminar materials again, I would say that while the few books and authors whom I have mentioned here in this thread were important, they were but the game pieces. LBR provided the the playing board and the rules. I've been very busy with some other projects, most notably a study of the character CL's intraday price action, but perhaps this weekend I'll have some time to share a few real gems from LBR's seminar.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely there are some loose criteria to validate 'sideways', and 'against your position'. The terms are too general I feel, just like the cliche 'cut your losses'. Is 2 ticks against your entry a loss? Many call that getting filled! You see what I mean? This is my difficulty with it and in my case, more often than not I end up thinking that I am cutting my losses at the time, but really I just end up cutting my profits. This small aspect of trade management is extremely hard for me to get a handle on. The problem is that it means something different to everyone based on their style. The guy that originally came up with the term - who knows what he/she really meant!

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... This small aspect of trade management is extremely hard for me to get a handle on....

 

No small aspect, friend Midk, surely!

 

Let me give an example from today:

 

I've mentioned that I've been working with my currency trading friend on a trading plan for crude oil. We're doing basic S/R - sell resistance, buy support - type stuff. We worked up a plan where we enter using limit or market orders, and we have determined that we generally need a 15-20 tick initial disaster stop, though typically price will print a stopping point much closer, sometimes a mere tick or two from our entry, within minutes if not seconds of entry. Our plan also calls for a fixed tick take profit level on the first contract.

 

Today, we did a live test run of our plan. We were not together during the trading day, and we did not communicate between 9AM and 2:30PM - no e-mail no phone, etc. At 2:30, he called to compare notes. We each had five trades. They were all the same. We had 3 wins and 2 losses. Our losses were identical - one for -2 ticks and one for -7 ticks. One winning trade we each made it to target (we were trading one contract and we agreed to exit at our predetermined profit target level. One two other trades, he made it to target, but on each I was stoped out on reactions that hit a trailing stop. The difference? I made close to 72 ticks in spite of myself. He made nearly 50 ticks more than I! Not bad on a day where there was only a 126 tick spread high to low during the pit session!

 

That 50 ticks on 1 CL is $500. So my trade management cost me $500 in profit opportunity. No small amount if averaged over the course of 200 trading days or so. And that is per contract, so multiply that out if trading a 3 lot, a 5 lot, a 10 lot.

 

No sir, friend Midk, trade management is no small matter at all - as my currency trading friend said to me this afternoon, "'tis the key to the kingdom, methinks," I think so too.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But surely there are some loose criteria to validate 'sideways', and 'against your position'. The terms are too general I feel, just like the cliche 'cut your losses'. Is 2 ticks against your entry a loss? Many call that getting filled! You see what I mean?

 

I think, though, if you look at what price did immediately after stopping me in you'd agree that there was no doubt that the best course was to exit at market quickly. I did place a new buy stop at 1.3591 after I exited the trade I had entered at 1.3585. As I tried to explain to Cory last week - pulling te rip cord is fine, but it only works for me over time because I always have a plan to re-enter in the original position should price get in gear. The basic structure of a long sequence was still in place until price made a new low. If you are going to trade based upon those sequences, you have to take them, even if you already had entered once and cut it loose with a small loss.

 

I have always made clear that I re-enter if called for even after pulling the rip cord. Re-entry makes the difference.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think, though, if you look at what price did immediately after stopping me in you'd agree that there was no doubt that the best course was to exit at market quickly. I did place a new buy stop at 1.3591 after I exited the trade I had entered at 1.3585. As I tried to explain to Cory last week - pulling te rip cord is fine, but it only works for me over time because I always have a plan to re-enter in the original position should price get in gear. The basic structure of a long sequence was still in place until price made a new low. If you are going to trade based upon those sequences, you have to take them, even if you already had entered once and cut it loose with a small loss.

 

I have always made clear that I re-enter if called for even after pulling the rip cord. Re-entry makes the difference.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

I think that the reentry issue is important because:

- if you can't reenter then exit quick strategies are much harder to take (cause u miss out)

- if you look at breakouts you get quite a few immediate failures but the break of the failure push is a much higher probability situation if the pattern stays clean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.