Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

rickek

Back Testing with Futures

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I was working with Back Testing in Tradestation and a question came up. I can't seem to find the answer any where. So help would be greatly appreciated.

 

When you back test lets just say the 30 Tres bonds (ZBM9 or USM09 depending the software), that chart is for June. You want to back test your strategy back 6 months. Does that back test just this chart/contract or does it keep it the lead contract?

 

Further explanation - you look at the February results of your back test. Is that the information for the June contract only or is there some kind of rollover? Is there a way to do rollover for furtures with backtesting in tradestation?

 

If there is someone out there who understands my question and can explain it, it would be great!!!

 

Also anyone who uses tradestation know why 30 US Treasury bonds is ZB(month, one number year) in other trading platforms but in the TS it is US(month, two number year). Are these the same charts/contracts...they look to be when compared with other platforms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rickek,

 

It may not be the best schema for a creating continuous contract but you can use @US, etc. for data that spans multiple contracts.

 

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have traded 30 yr bonds for about 3 years in a proprietary fund and found that when you backtest more than a few days back with Tradestation it curve fits. The 30 year bonds are heavily algo traded by many funds and banks, thus the movement and condition is often related to the Dow, S&P and the Nasdaq. This includes the mini contracts. The more successful 30 year bond strategies and trading systems available for Tradestation (easylanguage) use tick bars to eliminate the irrelevant factor of time and focus on market movements based on volume. 144 tick bars (plus or minus one fibonacci number) will produce clearly defined market movements and conditions for the 30 yr bonds. To optimize a system to tick bars you only need enough bars back to capture 3 or 4 examples of trending, oscillating and choppy market conditions. You can find this in just a few days of data.

 

Tradestation is not the best backtesting tool but it is great at forward testing a system. Using the simulator you can auto trade a system and watch it’s performance in real time. This allows you to see what kind of market conditions cause the system to break down.

 

One of the best tools for evaluating market conditions with tick bars is the Lasalle 3Line Trender.bonds%20with%20rsi_3trend_mkt%20conditions.png

 

For more information on using Tick Bars read "Building Winning Trading Systems With TradeStation" by George Pruitt and John Hill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have traded 30 yr bonds for about 3 years in a proprietary fund and found that when you backtest more than a few days back with Tradestation it curve fits. The 30 year bonds are heavily algo traded by many funds and banks, thus the movement and condition is often related to the Dow, S&P and the Nasdaq. This includes the mini contracts. The more successful 30 year bond strategies and trading systems available for Tradestation (easylanguage) use tick bars to eliminate the irrelevant factor of time and focus on market movements based on volume. 144 tick bars (plus or minus one fibonacci number) will produce clearly defined market movements and conditions for the 30 yr bonds. To optimize a system to tick bars you only need enough bars back to capture 3 or 4 examples of trending, oscillating and choppy market conditions. You can find this in just a few days of data.

 

Tradestation is not the best backtesting tool but it is great at forward testing a system. Using the simulator you can auto trade a system and watch it’s performance in real time. This allows you to see what kind of market conditions cause the system to break down.

 

One of the best tools for evaluating market conditions with tick bars is the Lasalle 3Line Trender.bonds%20with%20rsi_3trend_mkt%20conditions.png

 

For more information on using Tick Bars read "Building Winning Trading Systems With TradeStation" by George Pruitt and John Hill.

 

TradeStation is just a tool. It cannot decide by itself to curve fit. This is how you use it for backtesting which will determine if this is curve fitted or not.

 

Considering that your first post include a link to an indicator for sale, your post appear to be borderline SPAM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rickek,

 

your question is a good one. based on my experience, here is my 2 cents --- take the @US contract and run your strategy for the past year--- then go back and run the same strategy using the 4 individual contracts that correspond to the same time period of the continuous contract strategy results (find the rollover dates and sum the individual results into a total) --- align the dates so its comparable and see how, when and why there are differences.

 

I found that doing this was hugely informative. in reality, you are going to be trading the individual contracts, not the continuous contract, so you might as well figure out the nuances now anyway.

 

fwiw, when I did this for the S&P and Russell -- I found large differences in the tested results (on Tradestation). there are just some assumptions that have to be made in back-testing that you will learn if you go through this process on a 'bottom-up' basis. Personally, I would use the continuous contract to 'ballpark results' of a new idea I wanted to test -- but I would never trust the continuous contract when it comes time to really and truly analyzing the strategy results.

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something to be aware of with futures data is that if you are basing your roll decisions on volume/open interest, is that many exchanges do not provide volume and/or OI on a timely basis. Sometimes it is provided in estimate form then clarified a day later. Other times it is only provide a day late.

 

So if you have a trigger to roll, ensure that your rolls are done in accordance with when the data is available to you.

 

That being said, unless your trading systems are extremely sensitive, you shouldn't see much overall difference in a roll that is timed +- 1 day. If you do, perhaps the system needs refinement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sevensa, yes tradestation is a tool. The back testing engine is designed to curve fit to some extent. That’s just how the Tradestation algorithms work the more data you give it the more it curve fits. Building continuous contracts with time data is almost useless in Tradstation unless you are putting on positions that last several days (like trading stock or spreads, the discussion is about futures). If you are trading intraday then a more modern approach is warranted. That would be using tick bars and tools designed for them. The Lasalle link has the best screen shot example of 30- year bonds with 144 tick bars and the market condition patterns it makes (this is what rickek was talking about trading). When back testing using tick bars it is necessary to get enough data to cover a few instances of these patterns. This would usually be less than two weeks, sometimes two or three days. There are other market condition identifiers; this is the one I like. I use it on everything.

 

There are better commercially available back testing engines than Tradestation. But again forward testing is Tradstation on their simulator is excellent. The Tradestation back testing is ok if you keep it to a minimum as recommended by George Pruitt and John Hill.

 

I trade the ES, YM, NQ, and US almost every trading day. Because the US moves as slow as watching paint dry, I use an automated Polynomial RSI system on it and seldom hold overnight positions. The US seems to work well with overbought oversold type systems and indicators designed for tickbars.

 

If you want to build you own system start with a CCI or RSI indicator and add order execution signals. Backtest with optimization and find the median inputs for the best 10 or so optimization report input settings. Apply these settings to the indicator so you can see on the chart how the strategy trades in relationship to the market conditions and movement. With practice on the sim you can visually optimize the indicator for best performance in the current market conditions and apply these setting back in to the strategy.

 

There are several commercially available trading systems that use the strategy-indicator system. Most of these have high math algorithms to enhance the ability to capture oscillations.

 

Quality data for tick bars is a must. Tradestation has good data (low compression) thus works well with tick bars. In a side-by-side test with Tradestation, IQ feed had 25% less ticks than Tradestation. This is data compression and will it render back testing unreliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sevensa, yes tradestation is a tool. The back testing engine is designed to curve fit to some extent. That’s just how the Tradestation algorithms work the more data you give it the more it curve fits. Building continuous contracts with time data is almost useless in Tradstation unless you are putting on positions that last several days (like trading stock or spreads, the discussion is about futures). If you are trading intraday then a more modern approach is warranted. That would be using tick bars and tools designed for them. The Lasalle link has the best screen shot example of 30- year bonds with 144 tick bars and the market condition patterns it makes (this is what rickek was talking about trading). When back testing using tick bars it is necessary to get enough data to cover a few instances of these patterns. This would usually be less than two weeks, sometimes two or three days. There are other market condition identifiers; this is the one I like. I use it on everything.

 

There are better commercially available back testing engines than Tradestation. But again forward testing is Tradstation on their simulator is excellent. The Tradestation back testing is ok if you keep it to a minimum as recommended by George Pruitt and John Hill.

 

I trade the ES, YM, NQ, and US almost every trading day. Because the US moves as slow as watching paint dry, I use an automated Polynomial RSI system on it and seldom hold overnight positions. The US seems to work well with overbought oversold type systems and indicators designed for tickbars.

 

If you want to build you own system start with a CCI or RSI indicator and add order execution signals. Backtest with optimization and find the median inputs for the best 10 or so optimization report input settings. Apply these settings to the indicator so you can see on the chart how the strategy trades in relationship to the market conditions and movement. With practice on the sim you can visually optimize the indicator for best performance in the current market conditions and apply these setting back in to the strategy.

 

There are several commercially available trading systems that use the strategy-indicator system. Most of these have high math algorithms to enhance the ability to capture oscillations.

 

Quality data for tick bars is a must. Tradestation has good data (low compression) thus works well with tick bars. In a side-by-side test with Tradestation, IQ feed had 25% less ticks than Tradestation. This is data compression and will it render back testing unreliable.

 

Again TradeStation is the tool. Backtesting is done based on YOUR algorithms and trading strategy. Not some magical internal backtesting algorithm from TradeStation which curve fit on time based charts, but not tick based charts.

 

Just because you are unable to find a profitable system based on time charts with backtesting that also works in real time, doesn't mean it doesn't work and can't be done. All this means, is that you were not able to find something that doesn't work.

 

Thanks for all your other advise, but I am quite happy with my backtesting strategies. To be honest, I would take any advise from someone who think backtesting over three days is sufficient and that a screenprint of three moving averages is the holy grail, with a grain of salt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.