Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JKLM

IB Tick Data ... is It Worth Anything ?

Recommended Posts

IB does not send tick data. The data it sends are 0.2 - 0.3 second snapshots. So they aggregate ticks in 0.2 - 0.3 second intervals and this is the greatest detail you can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

I understand that it may delayed 0.2-0.3 second ..but when I get new refresh do I get info what was happening between two refresh ( trader volume and ticks )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK

I understand that it may delayed 0.2-0.3 second ..but when I get new refresh do I get info what was happening between two refresh ( trader volume and ticks )

No. Sorry for not being clear enough. Actually you dont get tick data in 0.2-0.3 second snapshots, but you get 0.2-0.3 second bars (or candles or whatever).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. You actually get the last price and accurate or probable volume for that 0.2 seconds - there may be other prices during that period but they are not represented.

 

Thats why IB did the 5-second bars ... which do contain an accurate count of volume + a bar representing OHLC for the 5 seconds. But never a tick count that matches other tick counts.

 

Its not that its complete crap - just that if ticks happen more frequently that 0.1-0.2 seconds then the missing count is missing. It can still be very useful - its just not a count of all ticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your options are

 

1) use IB's .2 seconds snapshots you will find a size that has the same look and feel as the tick size that you are used too.

 

2) Use constant volume, time or range charts (different look and feel). Constant volume is likely to be closest to what you are used to and some would argue better for some purposes.

 

3) Use another data provider (Zen Fire, Esignal, DTNIQ) spring to mind.

 

 

Be aware that some exchanges will aggregate ticks certain circumstances. I'm pretty sure (from memory) Globex is one so essentially its impossible to get absolutely full tick data for instruments trading there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of the three mentioned above I would first go with DTN IQ data without opening another broker service. They just supply data for you and are usually pretty solid. Not sure about Zen or how they work. I would not recomend esignal anymore as I have had a lot of trouble with them in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Esignal is a headache. The data is never reliable and bad tick is a common occurrence. Clean data in my opinion is a must in trading. Ive used DTN in the past but never had a problem with them. Though I think this industry needs more data vendors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question of reliability is an interesting one though blowfish.

 

I use IB tick data to generate tick charts. I have for the last few years.

 

I know that backfill won't give it (because backfill is limited to 5 seconds per bar or 30 seconds per bar or whatever best granularity your chart package requests from IB).

 

But in real time my tick charts spread out fast action so that action I wouldn't see on a minute chart after a breakout becomes clear and tradable. So for me, the tick chart is reliable (I don't care that the maximum ticks per second is 10 because thats still 600 tick or 100 6 tick bars in 1 minute).

 

So, for my use, IB ticks are perfectly "reliable." The show slow progress during slow times but spread the action out for clearer signals during fast action.

 

Personally, if you draw channels and trendlines or other angled lines on charts I recommend that you do that with minute charts because tick and volume charts distort them depending on current speed of action. But, although thats a common view, its just one view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely! I really like the 'look and fee'l of IB's 'pseudo' ticks and find them 'reliable'. In a fast market I would far rather have a 200ms sample with timely information than a full tick feed lagging by x seconds.

 

I really don't believe its a big a deal as some people make out though I guess some black boxes or quantitative systems might function better with an un-aggregated feed. I guessed that was the point of your question about application. I really can't imagine too many that would be impaired using IB's data despite its compromises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK ..I understand that RT tick chart is diferent because IB 0.2 sec snapshot data

 

but when I request history tick chart from IB in MC ...what would I get ?

true tick chart as it should be, or something other ?

 

I am asking this because I am not sure... can I test anything on IB history tick charts and expect similar results when it goes live ?

 

in other words ...If I trade on IB tick data ....what data should I use for backtesting and building my system ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what history granularity you charting requests. 5 second is the finest and SierraChart only requests that when you are in a 1 hour or below situation. 30 second is used by SC for longer term backfill requests.

 

 

If you are backtesting a system based on ib tick data you need to use the same fill you will use live ... ie live.

 

But to be frank if you want to test based on tick data you had better pay the money and get a feed that provides you true tick data live and backfill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used DTN IQfeed for almost one year and have never experienced a problem with them. They have been very reliable, and their customer service has been very good.

 

Another one I've heard about, but have not tried is Open Tick. I understand they are not accepting any new customers right now, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just need to see how good is IB tick data

so if anyone have historical CL data ( year or two ) in ASCI format please post it here

 

thanks

Edited by JKLM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well personally, I wouldn't worry about IB data if your not on it already. Forget about the data and make your choice broker wise that way.

I think what gets lost in this is most people don't trade off 1 tick charts, most of what we do involves snapshots of ticks and throwing out data to make a usefull summary at much slower intervals than .2 seconds...

The real difference between IB and a real tick provider is probly nothing unless your doing some high frequency autotrader deal..

If you like their broker services then just go with them and if you really need tick precise data then add DTN into the mix. DTN is impossible to beat bang for the buck wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on on what you are trading and what you want to do with your charts. On something like ES, having an aggregate tick count based on 0.2-0.3 second snapshots has little similarity to what's actually happening in the market. On a true tick data feed, the charts can turn a lot more quickly.

 

I have some indicator based strategies that I run on tick charts. I have other strategies that I run on 5-min candlestick charts. IB data is fine for the candlestick charts but is entirely unreliable for the tick strategies. I use a different broker for charting data.

 

As a risk control strategy, having a separate data feed for charting works out well. At least once a week, market data on one of my brokers will freeze. It's very convenient to have another vendor to inform you that the market is moving against your position.

 

Good trading,

 

Bam-Bam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On a true tick data feed, the charts can turn a lot more quickly.

 

Bam-Bam

 

I thought they only aggregated ticks at the same price? So in theory they should turn at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some confusion arising here about tick and historical data download from IB.

 

 

There are 3 different kind of quote data available form IB:

 

1. Tick data (realtime) is coming (as stated) in 0.2 to 0.3 sec intervals. It is mostly truly realtime but it can (rarely) be lagging max. a few seconds.

It comes as price (of trade) and volume information. If any trades at price levels away from the given price took place you will never know (this could happen only for very liquid instruments). Good thing is you never loose track of volume traded.

 

2. Historical data (to be downloaded). It can be ordered in various granularities (1 sec=minimum NOT 5 sec as was stated, 5 sec, 10 sec ... 1 day). The data comes as: Open, High, Low, Close, Volume (OHLC).

In one data request you can get (depending on interval chosen) about 2000 data points (33.3 minutes if 1 sec interval chosen).

Data download is throttled: If you make several data requests, you can only have one data request every 11 secs or so. That makes downloading of 1 sec data of a longer time interval pretty slow.

 

3. Realtime Bars (realtime at 5 sec intervals, OHLC bars). Currently it is only possible to get 5 sec realtime bars. Data comes (as with historicals) as Open, High, Low, Close, Volume.

The advantage over tick data is that you can be sure that you will see if a new High or Low has been made.

Tick data and Realtime bars from one symbol can be ordered in parallel.

 

 

Main question is in what kind of program you want to use the data.

If you want to make your own program, IB will be fine.

 

I am not aware of any commercially available program that could use all the possibilities that the different IB data formats give you.

 

Program to download data from IB in text form:

http://home.cidadevirtual.pt/jtwsdump/

(I am not the programmer and do not use it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.