Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RobinHood

Using IB *just* for Data

Recommended Posts

I was considering parking some money in an IB account so I can use them just for the data and occasional stock trade (probably none). I don't want to move all my money because I want be able to trade futures (age requirement for margin use).

 

Are there any problems which may occur as a result of this?

 

I know they have a $3 p/month fee but apart from that I'm basically getting data I would otherwise be paying $100 or so per month for. There are no requirements for me to trade etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Quoting this post....

 

Interactive Brokers provides stock/futures/bond data for free. Account minimum required is $2,000 USD (or is it $5,000USD?)

 

HOWEVER: a "bug" if you like with I.B; once you have deposited the funds and your account is active, you can withdraw your 99% of your funds (leave like $50 in there).

 

After a few months, they will send you an auto generated email along the lines of:

 

"please note, your account is below the minimum, please deposit additional funds or your account will be closed..." etc.

 

What they actually do is seize the funds from inactive low-balance accounts, however because that is such a cruel thing to do, they have to give plenty of warning. Like 2- 4 months.

 

After you get the warning emails, go into your I.B account and click the button that indicates you are putting in a deposit. This begins the cycle again - After a month your 'pending deposit' expires, you get another warning email, send another 'pending deposit' note, wait a month, etc etc..

 

I have had an old I.B account with less than $10 in it for over a year now. (smwinc)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been people complain that IB closed their accounts - I suspect they fit the category you are planning to join. So don't complain when it is closed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IB data is hopelessly inaccurate for volume so as long as you don't want to use volume in your trading you should be fine. It is more accurate on price though than most other feeds that I have come across.

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interactive Brokers provides stock/futures/bond data for free. Account minimum required is $2,000 USD (or is it $5,000USD?)

The initial deposit must be at least 10,000 USD, unless you fit into a special category, such as students and some others. The data are for free, but there is some activity required to obtain the free data. If you dont spend at least 10 USD for commission in a particular month, they will charge you 30 USD for the data for that month.

But I cannot recommend using IB data, as there is a poor download speed, very limited backfill and VERY inaccurate volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you dont spend at least 10 USD for commission in a particular month, they will charge you 30 USD for the data for that month.

 

Actually you have to spend $30 in commissions or you get charged $10 for the data and this only applies to US Stock and Futures data. Other sources of data have to be subscribed to at a cost but Forex data is free.

 

I have not had any issues with the speed of data and have found it to be as fast if not faster than any other data feed when used in real time.

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, sorry I couldn't remember how much the deposit was.

 

I never had any major problems with volume when trading US futures. Never really traded stocks through them.

 

At the end of the day, you get what you pay for. Bang for your buck, you can't beat I.B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have not had any issues with the speed of data and have found it to be as fast if not faster than any other data feed when used in real time.

Yes, sorry, I meant the backfill speed. The real time is ok, but backfilling is slow... at least for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IB data is hopelessly inaccurate for volume so as long as you don't want to use volume in your trading you should be fine. It is more accurate on price though than most other feeds that I have come across.

 

 

Paul

 

This is not my experience comparing it with Zenfire on various index futures. What they do do however is aggregate ticks however the volume is accurately reported e.g. If you have 10@6550 followed rapidly by 4@6550 they might report it as a single tick of 14@6550. In my experience on the instruments I look at it all gets reported. The situation might be different with say equities (which I dont trade) but I think I would have heard on the grapevine if there where issues. I used to hang out in a room where a lot of comparisons where done between feeds as people changed platforms and stuff. In fact the recommendation would be to trade constant volume bars rather than tick charts with IB. (that is if you need something other than fixed time charts).

 

There can also be issues with backfilling. They essentially 'throttle' requests so it takes a while if you want to load a lot of historic data. The dreaded "pacing violation".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is not my experience comparing it with Zenfire on various index futures.

Yeah, I've never found data that beat Zenfire, which you can easily get with Ninja (which is cheap to begin with).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 5 second data feed is accurate on volumes (but you only get data every 5 seconds unless you use something like SierraChart to combine 5 second data with live data).

 

Given the cost of interest lost on the 10k you'd be better off getting SierraChart and using their realtime data feed. That way you avoid the backfill issues and the quirky nature of ib data (I love it but it does require a bit of knowledge to get the most out of it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What they do do however is aggregate ticks however the volume is accurately reported e.g. If you have 10@6550 followed rapidly by 4@6550 they might report it as a single tick of 14@6550. In my experience on the instruments I look at it all gets reported.

 

Is this the case for all futures contracts?

 

That way you avoid the backfill issues and the quirky nature of ib data (I love it but it does require a bit of knowledge to get the most out of it).

I don't really mind suffering from backfill problems if I can save money. When I start making some more money I can look to buy better data. However "quirky" data is problematic. I don't want to spend countless hours and days watching depth and volume if the data is "quirky".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you going to be trading? And how many things will you be watching? How many for intraday data? How many for daily data?

 

I ask because for me IB data is "perfect" not quirky at all but this is because I trade relatively few things (thus avoiding backfill pacing problems when you load more than 30 days (or 30x1day) of data at a time). I also use SierraChart because it has a dll I wrote that combines 5 second data with live data to give you data charting that is 100% responsive and corrected by the 5 second bars for any missing ticks or incorrect volume counts in the incoming live data.

 

My understanding on volume counts is that for some exchanges where IB gets a live true volume count their data is 100% correct. For others they have to synthesize it so the live data is slightly off ... tick counts are always off (numbers of transactions not numbers of contracts traded) because IB sends a tick at most every 1/5th second so if 15 transactions occur in 1/5th second then it will show as only 1. I think the major US exchanges may be correct for volume on the live data but don't trade them so I'm not sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What are you going to be trading? And how many things will you be watching? How many for intraday data? How many for daily data?

 

OSE, HKFE, SFE, EUREX / mini-nikkei, mini-hang seng, SPI 200, bund bobl schatz

 

Will most likely start with just two instruments, e.g. hang seng + schatz.

 

Don't need much backfill as I'm going to just be recording intraday using Ninja Trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then just use IB. When trading MHI watch HSI ... MHI is basically following hsi so even if it gets a few ticks out of alignment it will pull back in because of the arbs.

 

Note that live IB data comes every 200ms but reflects only the last price in that 200ms. So it can miss high or low ticks and you will see that with hsi where the high or low of a minute bar used to be missed 2 or 3 times a day. That's why I did the dll to combine 5 second "true" data with live data for sierrachart.

 

If you're using ninja trader you could do a feed of the true data on hsi and the live data on mhi perhaps so that the highs and lows you work off were 100% correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OSE, HKFE, SFE, EUREX / mini-nikkei, mini-hang seng, SPI 200, bund bobl schatz

 

Will most likely start with just two instruments, e.g. hang seng + schatz.

 

Don't need much backfill as I'm going to just be recording intraday using Ninja Trader.

 

Good grief - you couldn't pick two instruments further apart in terms of how they will feel. May I ask what the reasoning is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats true. I would go with bund (good liquidity nice trendy moves not too much volatility) and STW (similar) if I was looking for some similarity. You could use ESTX50 rather than bund but I always liked bund.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're using ninja trader you could do a feed of the true data on hsi and the live data on mhi perhaps so that the highs and lows you work off were 100% correct.

I would only require the IB feed for this?

 

Good grief - you couldn't pick two instruments further apart in terms of how they will feel. May I ask what the reasoning is?

 

Eurex is open to me at night and Hang Seng during the day. While timezone was a consideration so was the size (I have only $20k or so to operate with).

 

I'm going to simulate for the first few months anyway so I have the option of playing around and finding something I think would suit me more in the initial stages of my scalping.

 

 

BTW which contract is STW?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STW is the Taiwan MSCI on SGX futures exchange with ib. It moves in $10 increments but with a little intelligence you can use 5 point stops so the risk is lower than hsi and not much worse than mhi (commission on stw is 4.90 round trip).

 

Yes you can do it all with ib. BUT. I don't know if ninja trader can use the true data. SC can but I don't know if ray has done this for nt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.