Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Flojomojo

Thoughts on Forex Volume

Recommended Posts

Part of the problem is that there is no way to determine how much size was placed in (or taken out) of the market to move price those ticks. On GJ's platform, absolutely nothing went through yet price moved. Yes, somewhere, size was put into the system, but because forex is not centralized, there is no way for anyone to tell how much size went through..

 

No, not neccessarily. If you study how price behaves across ALL the ecns, you realise that in many cases EBS is still the driver, and with the way the prices were flying about my best guess is that what little did go through on the other ecns was more likely to be latency arbitrage (and therefore really just a bit of noise in terms of overall market direction) than it was genuine interest trading. People had pulled a lot of their interest out at that point waiting for it to calm down a bit.

 

THAT's what I'm talking about in a nutshell.

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, not neccessarily. If you study how price behaves across ALL the ecns, you realise that in many cases EBS is still the driver, and with the way the prices were flying about my best guess is that what little did go through on the other ecns was more likely to be latency arbitrage (and therefore really just a bit of noise in terms of overall market direction) than it was genuine interest trading. People had pulled a lot of their interest out at that point waiting for it to calm down a bit.

 

THAT's what I'm talking about in a nutshell.

 

Cool. So I've learned something new today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
No Walter - it isn't. It might work for you to trade this way but be assured - the statement you made here in reation to FX and tick volume is utterly false.

 

EUR/CHF trading on EBS right after the oil data was a perfect perfect perfect example of what I'm saying.

 

Price was 1.6323/4. It went 23 Given then 22/23 21/22 20/21 19/20 without a bean going through (my screen shows bid, offer, last given, last paid etc etc). Finally someone paid the 20 offer (for smalls, which was all that was there). So at that point you had a 20/21 market where last paid was 20 but last given was 23!!!!!!!!

 

In between those two actual trades you had had lots of price updates that would have registered on your tick volume, but that didn't equate to a single euro of business going through.

 

This kind of thing is why I get frustrated. I try again and again to explain how stuff works, and people just hear what they want to hear.

 

GJ has it right. All those "tick volumes" that you see is just someone adjusting the bid or ask or both. No trades have to occur for this to happen. Think of it like a bookie adjusting the betting line to get the action going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In between those two actual trades you had had lots of price updates that would have registered on your tick volume, but that didn't equate to a single euro of business going through.

 

This kind of thing is why I get frustrated. I try again and again to explain how stuff works, and people just hear what they want to hear.

 

OK please dont get frustrated with me :) as you know I am a dunce when it comes to FX. (some would say that its not just FX but that's another story)

 

I do wonder if it is partly a matter of terminology. With futures (for example) you would only count actual trades as ticks not 'order book' updates or changes in best bid best ask etc. If you can't differentiate a trade from say someone pulling a limit order you are p*ssing in the wind. (I guess that's your point put rather more vulgarly) In fact if you are counting order book changes that are not the result of actual trades in any way shape or form you are going to be way way off base, however a futures trader would not refer to these as ticks.

 

Futures seem so straightforward sometimes :) FX and those that trade it seem quite different sometimes :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

thank you all for all this great input! I think its great for a new guy like me to discuss such stuff with the head of trading desk and other professionals!

 

So far my conclusion is: The assumption I made in my very first post (see picture) is wrong due to the way the OTC market and its microstructure works.

Since price changes in FX don’t equate with the classical view of volume I would put it in the term I read somewhere: The price “feels” its way up and down…by constantly adjusting Bid/Ask prices the market searches for the available liquidity pools.

Please correct me if I’m wrong.

 

GJ’s last post at T2W is: “Not saying they (tick volume and actual volume) are never positively correlated, just that they will just as often probably be either negatively correlated or uncorrelated.”

So any ideas out there how to determine from the market action which of the three cases applies?

 

Since this thread has attracted both the “pro tick volume” and “contra tick volume” crowd, I would like to push this thread into a new direction of insight:

 

OK…so the term “volume” is bogus in FX. Bid/Ask prices change due to transactions taking place or simply by price adjustments. Nevertheless this “tick volume”, how its usually called, seems to work for some people. Why is this the case?

Let’s drill a bit deeper and see whether we can find a new terminology that suits the pro and contra crowd!

Here’s my first go at it:

Let me pick up the example by GJ and assume it happens in an uptrend:

1.6323/4

22/23

21/22

20/21

19/20 …here someone hit the offer at 20. This is the only transaction between 24 and 20

20/21

 

Scenario1: Price falls straight from 24 to 20 then moving up to 21. Tick volume recorded = 10 (8 on the downside and 2 on the upside). Conclusion: The Composite Men (Wyckoff’s name to the total sum of more informed forces that move the market. Akin to “The market,” or “They” in other parlance.) are (a) bearish or (b) let price drift lower in order to buy at a cheaper price or © are at the sideline. If (a) is true GJ would have seen more action on the bid side. Therefore (b) or © are the case. Possible VSA equivalent: Low volume down bar with little “tick volume” in an uptrend. => probably (b)

 

Scenario 2: Price falls to 20 but wildly fluctuates between 24 and 21. Tick volume recorded is, lets say 100. Conclusion: CM are unsure if liquidity is to be found below 24, but consensus slowly favors the downside. Conclusion: CM are unsure, but let price drift lower. Possible VSA equivalent: High “tick volume” down bar in an uptrend but no real result. => “squat bar” or test in the making

 

So can “tick volume” be seen as more of a “sentiment indicator” of how market participants react to different price levels?

 

Curious about your opinions,

Flojomojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion is no, it isn't necessarily due to market sentiment at all It's just noise. For a start it's a chart feed and could come from anywhere. Secondly, even if it's taking its price from a half decent source, what happens behind that is that such a source will likely comprise contributions from many banks (it won't likely be ecn feeds as most of them dont publish this data externally in real time yet).

 

Thus all these contributor banks will usually be updating their price every few seconds on a 'heartbeat' basis and sending them to Reuters etc to publish. These are indicative quotes only, NOT dealable prices (which aren't simply streamed out to the ether in that way).

 

As the banks like to see their names on Reuters / Bloomberg contributor pages regularly, they're gonna update prices regularly. So you might get 3 updates in 10 seconds from each bank say, with the result that even assuming only 10 banks contribute to the feed, it's gonna be a very busy feed.

 

And these contributions are subject to a few certain rles. Chief of which is that they AREN'T alllowed to, for example, take the EBS Best bid and offer, re-brand them as the Citibank bid / offer (just an example) and send it out to Reuters as a contributor price. They would leave themselves open to litigation by an ecn like EBS if they did that (as they're not meant to be simply white labelling data that EBS make a lot money from selling).

 

But as it's only an indication price, it can be a bit wider. Doesn't have to be one point wide in eurusd.

 

So maybe EBS is 50/51, so they have a model that takes this in, and pumps out a price a pip around it, so they're 49/52. Now it's their own price, so that's fine.

 

Say someone else has a different model, one that always shades one side only. So their price might be 50/52 for example.

 

A third bank might have one that's one point wide, but always a tick higher than the EBS best bid say, so they are 51/52

 

If they all send in price updates to this mythical price feed vendor (someone whose data feeds your charts) the price might go 49/52, 50/52, 51/52

 

To the uninitiated it might look like buying interest is stacking up, but in reality all that happened is that the contributions lined up in a certain way.

 

And if the feed driving the chart is 'cleaned' to keep for example a constant spread or whatever, these underlying updates would all still probably require a new tick update in the chart.

 

Make sense? I'm a trader, not a data vendor, so any finer detail than this is straying away from my area of expertise a bit, but I just feel that a lot of people are just purely guessing in this thread, and not from a position of being able to make their guesses educated. Unless you have actually been involved in this stuff (and I have) then it's tough to have the relevant knowledge. Which is cool, but people just can't stop themselves from trying to guess at the answer anyway, and imho missing the point.

 

Hope this clears things up a bit

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

End of the day, surely, the simple fact that, as there is no exchange, means no one chart provider will have all the figures, whether its IG Index or Reuters.

 

The only way you can have a true representation of volume is if all trades go through an exchange (ie futures). Unless this is the case, you are never going to get a full representation of volume and thus, its all b*******.

 

 

EDIT: GJ beat me to it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even that would be fine IF one chart provider's data was even a reasonable proxy for the market. But I'm trying to demonstrate why even that just isn't so. This price update stuff is a total total red herring. end of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even that would be fine IF one chart provider's data was even a reasonable proxy for the market. But I'm trying to demonstrate why even that just isn't so. This price update stuff is a total total red herring. end of.

 

Precisely. Unless there is an exchange, no one chart provider could provide these stats as there is no central body taking every single piece of information. I think we are just confirming each other here so I'll sod off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll add to it then.

 

GammaJammer is correct. All forms of Volume and Tick counts on fx are bogus. They can't be anything else. Why? Because they are not a measure of volume and they are not a measure of transaction counts.

 

If you wanted to call it Picks or Pricks or then you have a valid measure (PriceIcs instead of Transaction Ics because all they really show is that the average of the bid and ask price changed). But. And its a very big But. The Pricks are only valid for your data feed. And they are exceptionally easy to manipulate because no actual transaction is required.

 

So, better to accept the uncertainty and just use time based charting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your insight, GJ. Those of us with lesser knowledge appreciate it. I knew "tick volume" was a bogus concept in forex, but I didn't understand it as deeply as you have explained. Even when you've been in this gig this for years, there's still a mountain more you can learn. That's what I love about this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi GJ,

did you ever attempt a study about how many price changes have been trades and how many just price adjustments?

 

Yes I knocked a quick Phd thesis out on that very subject before I had my cup of tea and bowl of shreddies this morning..... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I knocked a quick Phd thesis out on that very subject before I had my cup of tea and bowl of shreddies this morning..... ;)

 

I thought you sat around talking shop all day and not actually trading much as it is (middle management bankers! pah!) so surely this should be a walk in the park for a range bound Thursday like today! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a tie at all, merely a very creative stain from my tomato soup, cunningly spilled down my front in the shape of a tie. Getting the windsor knot at the top to look right was a beeatch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I knocked a quick Phd thesis out on that very subject before I had my cup of tea and bowl of shreddies this morning..... ;)

 

:o well...it was worth a try! ...and if you need a Phd candidate to resolve this question...I might actually have the time soon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:o well...it was worth a try! ...and if you need a Phd candidate to resolve this question...I might actually have the time soon...

 

ICAP (owners of EBS) actually have a research department working on stuff like this. They do seminars on it. Don't always agree with their findings (a few of the assumptions are imho deeply flawed) but it's very enlightening stuff nevertheless.

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me summarize this thread in a couple of sentences:

 

- Due to the OTC microstructure of the FX market, obtaining detailed volume figures is impossible.

- Tick-"volume" as it is called only gives a snapshot of the overall activity going on.

- Tick-"volume" is a misleading expression. Since here the number of price changes are counted and the FX market has a constant stream of repricing quotes, the figure doesn't necessarily provide a volume indication.

- Tick changes and volume might me uncorrelated or correlated sometime...but to this point nobody in this forum can or wants to tell whether or when a correlation exists. Theres also no study about how the flow of price quotes/ticks gives indications about the underlying supply/demand situation.

- Usage of tick-volume has no proof yet (that I am aware of) linking ticks to volume. Scientifically speaking it yet belongs to the mumbo jumbo section. Nevertheless some traders use it and are doing well!

 

Have a nice day,

Flojomojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.