Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

illumintai

Investment Competition Advice

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

 

I am an economics student and about to start competing in a portfolio competition. I am given 50 trades for 3 months (in european stock markets), so i guess I will have to buy at the beginning and keep it as it is til the end.

 

One trouble is, though I have a rough understanding of the markets, i need a practical stock selection book, something i can cram for a week and analyse the charts/use some free online tools to screen the best stocks to keep for 3 months (please recommend a free screening tool !)

 

I have done an accounting module as well as corporate finance one, from which i got a first class (UK system), but surely its far from practical.

 

So, please advise what I should do.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

try taking 10 diversified stocks with good price volatility, exit any position that goes against you immediatly, and hold the ones that stay positive. some chart reading and earnings anticipation may help your odds but this is all i can think of doing in 3 months. good luck man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To win a competition you need specialisation in the sectors which are going to do well in the 3 month period. I wouldn't worry about specific stock selection unless it's for fine-tuning between a few leaders in their sector.

Your task will be to identify the industry sectors most likely to benefit from the economic conditions in future months. Not easy I know, but get the right sectors and concentrate on the leaders in those industries. Don't over diversify, 8-10 stocks in 3 sectors is my thought.

If it were now I'd take a chance on the beaten down banking sector for starters, regardless of how you see interest rates moving, they're due a bounce.

Once your stocks are performing (or not) you should look to reduce the number of stocks by selling the weaker performers on dips and increasing your holdings of the winners. Don't put too many eggs in one basket though, 5 stocks should see you through to the competition end.

Don't be tempted to take profits too quickly, you need to run your winners to come out on top. That means increasing your holding on pullbacks.

Finally, don't overtrade. When the whole market is underperforming, your stocks will too. You will require patience at times.

Good luck in the competition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to win rather than just "do OK" you need to go all in on the highest risk bets you can find. You need to keep aggressively pyramid using all the margin available to you.

 

Sadly the tactics for winning competitions are quite different to those for successfully investing or trading.

 

Or maybe I am just a sceptic :)

 

EDIT: If you can get two 'accounts' it is much easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy asked for a stock selection book. Any ideas? Illuminati (if that is your REAL name) , unfortunately the majority of authors in this industry cannot trade, so they sell books. those who can't, teach. I'm sure you run up against that in school plenty of times.

 

If there was one book that you could cram in a week, then win an investment competition in three months, I'm sure we would all like to know which one it is.

 

Bottom line here - you need to get lucky. I don't know how you are graded on this, but if it is only on performance...

 

I would find some cheap stocks that are in motion, buy ten or fifteen, after a month sell the losers and dump all of the money into your winners. Ride the next 2 months.

 

This kind of fits in with Blowfish's sound advice.

 

(Or put it all in google.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
Illuminati (if that is your REAL name)

 

And waveslider is yours ???

 

:\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly the tactics for winning competitions are quite different to those for successfully investing or trading.

 

Or maybe I am just a sceptic :)

 

Your spot on there. I've entered a few competitions like this and the difference between first place and last place is always that first place has one extremely positive outlier while last place has an extremely negative outlier.

If your trying to win and there are 20+ people in the class your best strategy is to put on 10 of the highest risk, correlated bets you can find and pray.

Obviously, if your being graded on building a real world/real money portfolio then this doesn't make sense. If your just trying to win though diversification is the enemy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, if your goal is to win, you'll need to take some big risks (even some with slightly negative expectation) to put you ahead. These kinds of trading competitions promote very little "good" trading/investing.

 

If options are available to you, use them (you'll be able to get paid for more risk prema). I won an economics "investment competition" once by lobbying for use of derivates ("But, real investors and traders can use them!"), and then loaded up on risk. Classmate's account ballances were not known, so I had to guess how much I'd need to win. I ended up winning by 140ish% after some very lucky SPY OTM options.

 

The whole thing was a joke, because grades for the assignment were handed out on a bell curve based on account performance (top 20% got A's, next 30% got B's, next 40% got C's, and the rest got D's; if you didn't trade, you failed :) ). Additionally, The winner got 5 bonus points on the next test.

 

My overall strategy was to shoot for first, settle for a B (the top 50% got A's and B's, and it's extremely simple to make that group).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I obviously want to win this.

 

Can I just ask if anybody might be willing to offer some stock tips in the european markets ? i ploughed most of my assets in to oil firms and the result hasn't been so good. Need to save my portfolio !

 

Please help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oil companies are well priced in terms of the price of oil, so it's not like you're getting a wonderful bargan. I don't know much about the European stock market, but make some high volatility earnings plays. Risk is your friend, if you're looking for first place. Small cap companies often have high volatility as well.

 

Are you allowed to short stocks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

long only.

 

although I accept efficient market hypothesis explains all future cashflows to be discounted into the current share price, many reports suggest oil price to increase. Is this expectation also discounted into the current share price ?

 

Surely future profit of oil firms is calculated based on CURRENT oil price.... if I expect the oil to increase steadily in the next 10 weeks, can i expect oil firms' share price to increase by a similar amount ?

 

Thanks

Edited by illumintai

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Illumintai reports simply tell the past, just like charts. They report what has happened and project future price from past performance. Usually when everyone says the market is going a particular direction, the market has a tendency to do the opposite. Especially when it is non traders (such as many economists) predicting so. When everyone is buying, who is left to sell?

 

Avoid taking the easy trade, which in my opinion Oil seems to be. Making a gain in 3 months when you haven't traded before is more a gamble rather than performance based. My thoughts would be to tackle it from a deviation from the mean or average price. Put up some basic EMA's on the weakest performing sectors for the market you are trading. As you can't trade short, buy the ones that are the furthest underneath the EMA's and gamble on a return to the average or mean price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Just an update half way through the competition.

 

In the first two weeks I portfolio was -27%.

 

Ever since then I cleared up most of my oil and gas stocks and added the most volatile 2 stocks with 7 financials.

 

2 most volatile ones were housing companines incidently (not mortgage related) and have been the best performers so far.

 

Thanks to your advice I am now, although still in negative territory, at -4%

 

6 weeks to go, hopefully I will end up in the top 10 (currently +15% is on top 10) !

 

Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.