Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Frank

'Markets In Profile': Detailed Book Review

Recommended Posts

Today was good example of a market fitting into the framework I showed over the weekend. Thought I would share it for the concepts it shows.

 

1) 'Value Migration' -- Concept is to try to trade with 'value migration' until an auction has ended.

 

2) 'B to E' / 'L toP' Framework of a market choosing a direction and staying with it until the afternoon.

 

Friday saw 'value' form near 1390.75. Today, the market traded below the previous days value and below the previous days low. When value is migrating up on the higher timeframe (uptrend) and price is below recent value, the play is to look long (below value) and target a play back to previous value. You are getting asymmetric location because price is below value during an upward value migration.

 

Note also how the market made its low during the mornign (B-E) and its high during the afternoon (L-P). This was a very classic structure day.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6146&stc=1&d=1208811632

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6147&stc=1&d=1208813075

5aa70e59df1b6_April212008.thumb.png.37295d0e1f293f1868698d3853079875.png

5aa70e59e49b8_April212008IntradayStructure.png.ee822dcc6ccb13dd319b4dd5e994b9ba.png

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Frank, can you explain why you chose the 40 sma? I've reread post 19 and I think you use it to approximate vwap but I just want to make sure. Thanks for the great thread.

 

there is no magic with the 40 sma. I am using it only to 'represent' where current price has moved 'from' in order to gauge 'value migration.' It is being used as a 'reference point' to help guide me. As price and the moving average converge, you might say the current auction is 'aging' -- but not necessarily over. Remember, it's not over until you get a sign of 'excess.' I do not want to be looking for reversals ALL the time or else I would miss out on lots of good trades. The market will often auction one direction and then chop around while the moving average 'catches up' to current price. As this happens, you get closer to auction reversal and should be on the lookout for 'excess' -- as reviewed above. (also, note that occassionally -- the 'excess' signal is kind of grew -- using a moving average will act as a bit of a safety-net in case I missed the signal).

 

btw, 'vwap' measures todays average price. I never look at vwap for a period longer than current day. there might be use in such but I have not discovered such.

 

hope that helps a little bit,

 

frank

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank., it is great ! I have watch the market today and looking for your setup, A-D looking for low ! it is just happen. However, I would ask you , in actual trading, how do you enter the trade , as B, C,D period all make new low, in real time, how do we actually know which one are the final low for the morning period ? Do you try to catch the low ,everytime the 30 minutes bar make new low ?

thanks.:pc guru:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi winnie,

 

btw, in profile -- for whatever reason, the first 30-minutes is 'B period' (not A). also, there is no 'o-period' -- it goes straight from N to P. I can guess why but it doesn't really matter, I am just following 'their' etiquette.

 

 

ok, to fine-tune the entry, I use either a support level from past days or an oscillator pattern or an oscillator divergence. a little tape reading adds to the context.

 

today, I was looking to go long. but the 'fat' part of fridays profile was 1390.75 -- you can see this by watching the volume at price every day and recording the highest volume price. there was significant contract volume at 90.75 on Friday and we were under that today --- so this was a resistance level. it would be tough to go long too close to that level as that was your profit objective (buy below value, sell at/near value) so you wanted to wait for price to push down and then go long.

 

we pushed up right off the open and into 89.00 and reversed. As we pushed down, volume was weak --- which weakens the short-side argument and adds positive context to your original long-side gameplan.

 

just after 10:30am, a momentum-price divergence developed. price made a lower low while the 3/10 oscillator made a higher low. this is a well-known technical signal you should study. a divergence like this is a very short-term thing but you are just looking for a decent price to go long -- your real play is the market profile structure that you have analyzed.

 

the divergence occured and price tested up and then back down just as 'D-period' ended. Your expectation is that the low in D would hold. It traded down very slightly below this during the first minute of E. This is the kind of movement you just have to ride out. E is still a decent 'reversal zone' -- and it only violated the D-low for a brief moment in time. Sometimes, the market will continue to move against you there and you will have to figure a way out of your position. In this case, that low was the low for the day and price marched up until N-period, consistent with the structural bullish higher-timeframe bias.

 

note that the market ended up testing the previous days high volume price at ~1390.75 and finding resistance late in the day.

 

btw, I used a 800tick 24-hr chart here. I am watching the futures across many timeframes and usually time a divergence using either the 400-tick, 800-tick or 1600-tick charts. this part of trading, the very short-term nuances of entries, are very much a 'feel' thing.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6151&stc=1&d=1208837149

5aa70e5a08680_April212008DivstoEnter.thumb.png.2794b3e25d1ec8e06a886c5742e92ebf.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Frank,

Do you have any idea in today 's market. Yesterday, I have strong feel that it will make new low first and high in afternoon. However today , I really don't have any idea. Just want to know how you think ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi winnie, we had 'auction reversal' this morning.. I am expecting this to trend down until after 3pm...

 

here is a trick, yesterday we made high last and today we opened below yesterdays open. this is an auction-reversal signal (combination of a high close and open below previous opening price). this is a 'shock' gap and adds fuel to the fire as trapped longs have to sell when market breaks lower.

 

The first day of auction-reversal should be the most dynamic day. I have big short on... hoping for the best. we'll see.

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

note that the S&Ps made a low 3 mins before 3pm, this fits the 'L-P' model -- though it is more common for S&Ps to make a low after 3pm, 3 mins is close enough to call it 'afternoon low.' also, the profile did not 'elongate' to the downside. looks like this was a 'long liquidation' (inventory adjustment that may have completed) and not a lot of new selling (ie, an elongated profile -- which would imply continuation).

 

The market would still be 'expected' to violate todays low tomorrow. But tomorrow might be a day to go long if/when that happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

potential 'laggards are in' signal this morning.. selling tail in 'D period' on a penetration of previous day high. this occured into key 89.00 resistance.

 

could be 'excess high'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Frank,

yes, the laggards are in signal this morning ! thank you. After today's close, the market seems to be "balanced". Do you mean we can buy low , sell high in this case ? Is there any trend now ?

Thank you Master !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is same material presented slightly differently.

 

Wednesday morning saw higher timeframe sellers come in Period-D. Remember that when you are above the previous days high, you should be looking for a potential B-E reversal. The market traded down on Wednesday and this selling spilled over into Thursday.

 

On Thursday, the market went below Wednesdays low in Period-D. The 60-min auction appeared to be down at the time. But below the previous days low and a reversal UP in periods B-E is a buy signal. Thus, you need to be on guard that the selling cycle that began on Wednesday (above Tuesdays high) could be over.

 

On Friday, you were in day 2 of a new value migration up. Below the high of Thursday is a long possibility if get a reversal UP in periods B-E. We did make a low in E and then proceeded to march up through previous days high.

 

Note that all 5 days this week made the intraday high or low in B-E and 4 of 5 didn't stop going that chosen direction until at least 'L-Period'. The market will tend to do this but don't expect it to happen every day like it did this week. Can expect generally 3+ of 5 days in a given to act like this...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6211&stc=1&d=1209214586

5aa70e5bcd630_April252008StructureReview.thumb.png.d666eb983bb1a2e44a0e5bb872af2af4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The core high-level intraday model says that more often than not, the market will choose a direction and then continue that direction until the last hour. But let's quantify this tendency.

 

Since Thanksgiving, the 110 trading days have seen 70 days (64%) that had this tendency. That is, the high or low for the day was made AFTER 3pm. If we add 'Period L' into it as well (2:30pm or later), it becomes 80/110 -- or 73%.

 

This is not a forecast of the future -- simply a statement of fact about the last 110 days.

 

I am still trying to figure out how to actually use this tendency. But the vague idea is to think that on any given day, once the market has chosen a direction --- more often than not, the S&P's will tend to continue in the chosen direction until the final hour.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6280&stc=1&d=1209915649

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6281&stc=1&d=1209915649

5aa70e5d9c6a4_HighLow110daysendedMay22008.thumb.png.51ec56292e04caa48866398fd4dea280.png

5aa70e5da4e76_LPFinalHighLow110daysendedMay22008.thumb.png.13569a1bf3cfd6152c0bda317ffdfc19.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.