Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Lopen

Which contract should a beginner trade?

Recommended Posts

I say you start with YM - one of the other benefits is the data feed is still free. If you start paying data fees, that's just more money you are going to have to make just to break even.

 

I don't think data feeds are that expensive... ;)

 

In other words, I would not trade a contract purely based on saving 100 bucks a month (emini package thru DTN).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
I don't think data feeds are that expensive... ;)

 

In other words, I would not trade a contract purely based on saving 100 bucks a month (emini package thru DTN).

 

I agree.

 

If the cost of data and charting is a make it or break it proposition for you, then perhaps you shouldn't be trading futures to begin with.

 

Just my two ticks' worth....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Soul...this is the one time I've got to disagree with ya. I've been trading NQ the past few days now and I wish I started out on this one. It's a great contract for beginners because the tick value is the same as YM but the range is less, so the risk ends up being less. You can find great setups that could use a 2 point stop on the NQ based on what the market tells you, and that equates to 8 YM points. Is the reward going to be smaller? Absolutely! BUT it gets your feet wet with real money without having to risk AS much. This is a contract I've been testing a new strategy on and instead of risking play money and not getting that emotional thing that we all love...I'm risking real capital and seeing how my emotions play into the strategy. So far, so great :)

 

I vote for NQ or YM, with preference to NQ.

 

I'm brand new here, but have a question on using YM v. NQ. It would appear that a particular move on YM is maybe double the number of ticks as the same move in NQ. Since you pay 1 tick to get in and 1 to exit, that cuts the profit disproportionately in the NQ, right? Example: a 20-tick scalp on YM may yield a net of 18 ticks, whereas the same corresponding move in NQ would net only 8. So instead of being half the profit, it's actually 44%

 

In addition, the commission of, say 4.60 RT is actually halved on the YM trade, since the profit is only half of the NQ trade.

 

Does this make sense? Or are there are other factors I'm not aware of, like better fills on NQ? Seems like there's more volume on YM, though.

 

I plan to do a lot of this trading, scalping for 5-20 ticks, so I'd appreciate any thougts. Many TX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
I'm brand new here, but have a question on using YM v. NQ. It would appear that a particular move on YM is maybe double the number of ticks as the same move in NQ. Since you pay 1 tick to get in and 1 to exit, that cuts the profit disproportionately in the NQ, right? Example: a 20-tick scalp on YM may yield a net of 18 ticks, whereas the same corresponding move in NQ would net only 8. So instead of being half the profit, it's actually 44%

 

In addition, the commission of, say 4.60 RT is actually halved on the YM trade, since the profit is only half of the NQ trade.

 

Does this make sense? Or are there are other factors I'm not aware of, like better fills on NQ? Seems like there's more volume on YM, though.

 

I plan to do a lot of this trading, scalping for 5-20 ticks, so I'd appreciate any thougts. Many TX.

 

You need empirical data to support your assertions, IMHO.

 

The daily volume on NQ is far greater than YM - and that's a fact, supported by the data.

 

As for the range on the NQ vs the YM, if you are trading size, you'd probably want to use the NQ, due to the risk of slippage on YM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tim, I think if you just look at the reasons you posted upside down it will make more sense from a beginner stand point. I believe what you posted is true as a rule of thumb but you would also lose less when your wrong. NQ you can have a tighter stop if your wrong dollar wise.

They are close enough though starting out that its not going to make or break you, your strategy will do that. If your totally wrong with your strategy overall NQ though should be able to give you some extra trades on your roll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great posts, all make perfect sense. I trade the ES first, then the YM, er and nq in that order, basically whatever is moving the most. I like the ES as i can watch the tape and follow the pros slamming multi thousand contracts and ride along for a few ticks to an easy point. The YM spreads are friendlier and you can have wider stops plus you can look at the 30 individual stocks in the cash market and use that as a guide on another monitor. the ER is wild and if you trade tight stops you'll most often be taken out but when its running you can make a bundle fast. Not really an NQ fan but the NQ follows technicals really well, it loves to test the POC almost daily unless its a big trending day. Moves a bit too slow for me. Only gripe on the ES is that at $12.50 per tick, any slippage and your playing catch up. on 5 contracts you're -62.50 from the beginning. I use limit orders on 95% of ES trades to avoid that. Market only when its flying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you both for good, considered replies. I actually have more success with ES than any other of the eminis. When you're scalping for a few ticks, I've found it's important to be able to buy the bid and sell the ask, which I can do more frequently on ES. If you have more patience than I do, and trade for points instead of just ticks, no doubt you could do quite well with either NQ or YM. I do think that strategies should be tested on a simulator until you get some consistent results. I know to my regret how easy it is to lose real money no matter what is traded if you've got a shaky strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Related to the question of best contracts is one about best brokers. I use TradeStation and seem to get decent fills, which is very important when trading ES. But I hear that since they clear through another house (RJ Obrien) that that can slow the process a little. I like their charts and the matrix trading platform.

 

Anyone have any comparisons?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Related to the question of best contracts is one about best brokers. I use TradeStation and seem to get decent fills, which is very important when trading ES. But I hear that since they clear through another house (RJ Obrien) that that can slow the process a little. I like their charts and the matrix trading platform.

 

Anyone have any comparisons?

I also used TS but dropped it for Ninja/Zenfire which is faster and is server to server direct. The trading strategies options are also out of sight. I still use TS charts--Ninja's are lousy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I'm not familiar with server to server term; what is TS? And is Ninja enough faster to warrant the hassle of switching over? Also, I do like the ability to see the order lines on the charts; I only wish you could trade from the TS charts by moving the lines directly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks. I'm not familiar with server to server term; what is TS? And is Ninja enough faster to warrant the hassle of switching over? Also, I do like the ability to see the order lines on the charts; I only wish you could trade from the TS charts by moving the lines directly.

 

FYI - you can 'trade from the chart' with Open ECry as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately, the OpenECry OEC Trader simulator is one of those that is so "loose" that it triggers limit orders as if they were "market if touched" orders.

 

Pretty poor and shoddy implementation, IMHO. It suckers newbies into thinking that real world trading would match this performance - which, of course , it won't.

 

I did like the Transact AT simulator (same as Infffinnity) since they actually recognized this limitation and made certain that it either trades thru the level on the sim or sits in the queue for a period of time.

 

Your real-world expectations and experience may vary either way.

I find NinjaTrader's sim mode very conservative and probably the most realistic to live trading. In fact, I have entered orders simultaneously--real and sim--and the real get filled before the sim, so if you're having success in sim, you will have more in real mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a related question, namely slippage. What would you say is a reasonable value in terms of ticks to attribute to slippage on each of ES, NQ, ER2 and YM

Is 1 or 2 ticks satisfactory when designing a system?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a related question, namely slippage. What would you say is a reasonable value in terms of ticks to attribute to slippage on each of ES, NQ, ER2 and YM

Is 1 or 2 ticks satisfactory when designing a system?

Design a system that only uses limit orders and slippage isn't an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.