Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

rahan7799

TradeStation Radarscreen - TradeVolume

Recommended Posts

The only way to get real volume information, including up and down volume, in radar screen is to use the price series objects.

 

Hello,

 

How accurate is the uptick/downtick data from TS?

 

I've seen references to it been less reliable than the MarketDelta data, but then such claims have come from vendors affiliated with the latter . . .

 

If TS uptick/downtick accurately represents trades executed at ask/bid, then it is pretty hard to imagine where the difference might lie between what can be calculated from that information, versus the MarketDelta products.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,How accurate is the uptick/downtick data from TS?

I've seen references to it been less reliable than the MarketDelta data, but then such claims have come from vendors affiliated with the latter . . .If TS uptick/downtick accurately represents trades executed at ask/bid, then it is pretty hard to imagine where the difference might lie between what can be calculated from that information, versus the MarketDelta products.BlueHorseshoe

 

It is not so much a question of accuracy as it is a question of method and a question of the efficacy for the particular application of each method.

 

Data vendors use several different methods to determine Up and Down Volume.

 

Most people believe that Up and Down is determined only by whether the trade was on the bid or on the asked. A more common, and some say a better, method is via Price "Up and Equal" for Up Volume and "Down and Equal" for Down Volume.

 

In my work I have found TS Up & Down volume calculations to be quite useful. Before I came to that conclusion I wrote code in a strategy using IntraBarPersist to measure true UpTick volume and true tick by tick Up and Equal.... volume. The results were plotted graphically via the El Collection Global Dictionary. Of note is that you cannot use calculations that measure/value each tick in indicators and must use strategies to get full value from IntraBarPersist..

 

On close examination of the dynamics of the formation of local extremes you will find that many if not most local extremes are formed by seemingly "opposite" volumes.

 

For instance in the ES many tops are formed by Up/Buying volume and not by selling volume as one would suppose. What happens is that in order to disguise size entries, big players will often establish a top when upward price momentum meets the players price, the player simply keeps replenishing the asked every time there is a trade.

 

This replenishment in the microsecond time frame is noticed by a huge increase in trade velocity and well as constant trade on the asked, over a very short time frame, that is obviously not buying and price remains at that asked rather than trading through it.

 

In our system development work we put heavy weight on indicators calculated from and around the 3 V's -

 

1) Volume broken down into our particular way of differentiating Buying from Selling at particular points in price. Don't forget that at its base the movement of price is about money flow - more buying more likely to go up.

 

2) Volatility of both price and our calculation of net trade which we simply call net new trade. If there is no volatility in BOTH price and net trade there is most probably not enough volatility to justify price speculation in that particular time frame.

 

Time frame volatility is why when we think of portfolio we do not necessarily think of development for a portfolio of symbols but rather we think of a portfolio of time frames so that in periods of lower volatility only the fastest bots trade and in periods of great trending all the different time frames trade.

 

3) Velocity - When trade occurs at very high velocity it is most likely the result of computer execution and that helps locate smart size trade as 2 lot traders do not have their orders computer executed in the sub second time frame.

 

cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Urma,

 

How can we calculate trade velocity ? Is there any indicator? can be buit it in Radar screen?

Please let me know.

 

John

 

Trade velocity can be very useful in locating the kind of trade that forms local intra-session extremes.

 

The idea is that trade that is executed by computer is faster than a set of random orders placed by human traders and that small/retail traders don't have the wherewithal for computed executed entries and exits.

 

One prime issue when using the velocity of trade as a trade decision support mechanism is that while arbitrageurs often use computer execution when deploying premium arbitrage strategies, at the same time they might be making large computer executed buys or sells in a derivative market(i.e., futures) - they are also making the opposite transaction in the physical markets..

 

That said, attached is a spike in buy trade velocity taken this morning at the open of ES which, as of this writing is also the low of the day.The chart is noted in PST and you can see the buy spike in trade velocity in the middle graph at the far left which is just at today's open in ES.

 

The direct answer to your question is that that we use several different algorithms to calculate the velocity of trade and which one we use is dependent on instrument, sensitivity and which trade type we are trying to identify.We, as of now, don't use this indicator in Radar Screen buy will add such to our indicator pack in the near future.

 

cheers

 

pat

TPS00135.thumb.jpg.fb5d541add9110269a07900e87b94e37.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • its a slow start for 2021, but BTC is having a blast, hitting the 40k mark, will it continue, though its back at 32k++right now
    • a fun perspective on MSM’s role in recent events https://www.hangthecensors.com/490535.html     plus more inauguration day / welcome to north venuazala tidbits ...  2,000 attendees at inauguration — and 25,000 military — just like ‘regimes’ in banana republics ... just sayin'  
    • This is precisely the way MSM would describe it... :snarc: https://internationalman.com/articles/the-coming-new-order/ https://mises.org/wire/what-bidenharris-will-do
    • Date : 23rd January 2021. FX Update – January 22 – USD Holds gains & PMI’s. GBPUSD, H1 The Dollar has firmed up on a safe haven bid with the reflation trade having come to a firm stop. The USDIndex lifted moderately to a 90.25 high after basing out at a nine-day low at 90.05. The US currency gained only marginally against the Euro and Yen, but racked up gains of around 0.4% to 0.5% against the Pound and dollar bloc currencies. EURUSD ebbed back from an eight-day high at 1.2178, before recovering to 1.2188 following Eurozone PMI data, while USDJPY lifted to a two-day high at 103.70. Global equity indices corrected from record highs in the cases of the main US indices and the MSCI Asia-Pacific Index. Base metals are also markedly lower. Lofty valuations and an increasing level of concern about the Covid situation have warranted increasing investor caution. Covid restrictions have been implemented across northern China, and the new highly transmittable variant of the SARS-Cov2 coronavirus — aka the British variant, where it was first detected — has shown up as far afield as Beijing and Australia. The EU looks set ban travel to the UK, while the UK has already imposed much tougher international travel restrictions. The rollout of the Covid vaccinations globally has also been proving to be bumpy. Elsewhere, cryptocurrencies dropped sharply again, which will only add to their reputation for being too volatile for serious institutional investors to touch. Reports that the Biden administration has tighter regulations for cryptocurrencies on its ‘to do’ list have been driving cryptos lower. Bitcoin was showing an 11% loss on the day, as of the early London morning, at $30,860 — which is nearly 26% below the record high seen earlier in the month. The virtual coin earlier traded below $29,000 for the first time since January 1. Eurozone Flash PMI readings declined as lockdowns were strengthened and/or extended. The last minute Brexit deal may have helped to prevent a worse number for the manufacturing sector at least, and the decline in the Eurozone manufacturing reading to 54.7 from 55.2 was actually less pronounced than feared with the number still pointing to a solid pace of expansion. Services meanwhile are clearly suffering. The Eurozone services PMI dropped back to 45.0 from 46.4, driven largely by a sharp deterioration in the French reading, which fell to 46.5 from 49.1. The German index held up better than feared and dipped only slightly – to 46.8 from 47.0. The overall composite for the Eurozone came in at 47.5, down from 49.1 at the end of last year and supporting expectations for a technical recession over the Q4 and Q1 period. Across the Channel UK PMI data showed a woeful record for Services and came in much weaker than expected. The headline composite PMI plunged to 40.6 from 50.4 in December. The median forecast had been for a 45.5 reading. Pronounced weakness in the service sector drove the composite lower, with services bearing the brunt of the lockdown across the UK nations, which has been the most severe since last year’s ‘mother’ lockdown. The prelim services PMI headline dove to 38.8 from 49.4. The prelim manufacturing PMI fell to a headline reading of 52.9 from 57.5, which was near the median forecast for 53.0. Much of the manufacturing sector remains open, despite the lockdown. The drop in the composite reading, while sharp, is still less much less severe than was seen during early spring last year. There are hopes that the UK’s world-leading vaccination programme will start to see restrictions lifted from as early as mid February, by which time all the most vulnerable groups should have been vaccinated. Cable trades down to test 1.3650, down from yesterday’s high at 1.3745 and today’s open at 1.3729. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Stuart Cowell Head Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Yes, its important to select a forex broker, start by looking for brokers that are regulated in your country. Next, read full length forex reviews to assess the trading costs, tools, research capabilities, customer service, and other features of each forex broker. Finally, compare your top two choices side-by-side to decide on a winner.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.