Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

danielk

Emini (ES) - Why the Need for Huge Capital?

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Edit: Right, so i think ive answered my own question through research. The reason for the capital requirement is the "initial margin" requirements set by the exchange CME+broker. As far as i understand it they require around $4500 as a form of liquidity(insurance) per contract, pretty much to do risk management for you..? Still seems high to me given the actual movements a contract typically can do.

--

 

I'm a noob. And i keep reading about how E-minis require relatively huge capital to trade safely, but dont understand it. I've also noticed all the warnings of it being extremely risky for those who do not understand it, hence this post.

 

So the advice i keep seeing is to have a bankroll of $5000-$10.000 PER contract you trade.

 

A general observation of the ES is that it tends to move 15-30 points an average day. It is also very rare to see it move more than 10 points in 1 hour, usually averaging 2-4 points of movement an hour.

 

In contrast to forex, this seems a lot "safer" - making the likelyhood of huge sudden moves a lot lower.

 

Now, not that any strategy would allow this to happen, but lets take a worst case scenario. You've got $5000 on your account, and buy 1 ES contract when it opens. You for some reason ride the downtrend and the ES closes 30 points down. Netting you a loss of 30x$50 = $1500. You still have $3500 left.

 

Now, if you have a long term strategy that must allow for huge stop losses, then i can get behind the $5000 recommendation. However, if i were to guess, i would imagine most strategies(at least mine would) use a SL of.... 2-5 points? $100-250 potential loss.

 

Then my question is, why would you advise having a $5000-10.000 bankroll, when your worst case SL stops you out at a $100-250 loss?

 

Is this the "max 2% capital risk" rule in action?

 

Dont want to come off seeming reckless here, but somehow this just seems a bit overly cautious to me?

 

Appreciate any thoughts!

Edited by danielk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2% probably seems conservative if you're in this as a get rich quick scheme or have gambling mentality. You mention a 30 point loss, which would be 1500.

 

Can you imagine a casino, which has an edge in all their games, risking 30% of their entire capital on one bet? That casino would soon go out of business. What about a hedge fund or a bank?

 

So you have to decide if you want to run your trading as a business, and slowly accumulate wealth, or if you want to gamble and have some ups and downs before you lose the lot.

 

$5000 is not HUGE capital. If you don't have the capital, you shouldn't trade. Work and build up your stake and learn on demo so that when you do have a stake you can earn with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

Edit: Right, so i think ive answered my own question through research. The reason for the capital requirement is the "initial margin" requirements set by the exchange CME+broker. As far as i understand it they require around $4500 as a form of liquidity(insurance) per contract, pretty much to do risk management for you..? Still seems high to me given the actual movements a contract typically can do.

--

 

I'm a noob. And i keep reading about how E-minis require relatively huge capital to trade safely, but dont understand it. I've also noticed all the warnings of it being extremely risky for those who do not understand it, hence this post.

 

So the advice i keep seeing is to have a bankroll of $5000-$10.000 PER contract you trade.

 

A general observation of the ES is that it tends to move 15-30 points an average day. It is also very rare to see it move more than 10 points in 1 hour, usually averaging 2-4 points of movement an hour.

 

In contrast to forex, this seems a lot "safer" - making the likelyhood of huge sudden moves a lot lower.

 

Now, not that any strategy would allow this to happen, but lets take a worst case scenario. You've got $5000 on your account, and buy 1 ES contract when it opens. You for some reason ride the downtrend and the ES closes 30 points down. Netting you a loss of 30x$50 = $1500. You still have $3500 left.

 

Now, if you have a long term strategy that must allow for huge stop losses, then i can get behind the $5000 recommendation. However, if i were to guess, i would imagine most strategies(at least mine would) use a SL of.... 2-5 points? $100-250 potential loss.

 

Then my question is, why would you advise having a $5000-10.000 bankroll, when your worst case SL stops you out at a $100-250 loss?

 

Is this the "max 2% capital risk" rule in action?

 

Dont want to come off seeming reckless here, but somehow this just seems a bit overly cautious to me?

 

Appreciate any thoughts!

 

Hi Daniel,

 

I think there are two elements to your thinking here, and you need to be careful not to confuse them.

 

1) The notion that a margin of $4500 is actually a rational requirement is probably nonsense, as you suggest. In as much as it is to provide liquidity insurance, the ES is incredibly liquid and it is hard to imagine (even in a flash-crash type scenario) that a broker would decide to liquidate a position you had and then find that the market had to move 90 points before they could do so. The ES probably goes lock limit before then (you can find the exact details on the CME website), however, and in that situation your broker becomes just as stuck as you, so . . .

 

2) None of this really has anything to do with the size of your account or how much you should or shouldn't risk on each trade. Margin - you've said it yourself - is liquidity insurance for a leveraged product, and that is not the same as the money management approach you take when trading.

 

I imagine another reason that the broker has the margin requirement is that they prefer to have that money in their account rather than yours.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BlueHorseshoe!

 

Thanks for the feedback!

 

From my research it seems that the requirement for the initial margin, is actually a mandatory requirement from the CME Exchange itself and fluctuates based on market conditions(volatility). Some good reads on the topic;

 

Understanding Margin Changes | OpenMarkets

 

http://www.cmegroup.com/clearing/files/cme-clearing-margins-quick-facts-2011.pdf

 

And CME's overview of current margins aka "Performance Bonds"

 

http://www.cmegroup.com/clearing/margins/#e=CME&a=EQUITY+INDEX&p=all

 

So currently CME demands $4510 initial margin for every contract traded. This is CME's approach to helping out with risk management and ensuring the right type of volatility. Not to be confused with a traders own risk/money management policies, naturally :)

 

If i understand it correctly, 1x ES contract is worth 50x the S&P 500 index, that puts a current contract value at 50x 1,752 dollars. So in effect one single contract is worth $87,600.

 

Knowing all that really puts things into perspective and makes the $4510 initial margin perfectly understandable!

 

And to Seeker, sorry for the impolite response. However, you either didnt really read what i posted, or otherwise misunderstood my question...

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.