Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Looking for the Best Price Entries? Trade Failed Breakouts

Recommended Posts

When forex traders are getting started in learning about technical analysis techniques, one of the first terms that we come across is the “breakout,” which is a pattern formation that lets traders know that significant momentum is present in the market. True breakouts indicate major turning points in market sentiment, as highly significant and closely watched support and resistance levels are overcome and invalidated. In most cases, these important levels of supply and demand (support and resistance) hold, and help to guide price activity. So when these levels break, it implies market dynamics are changing and that prices are ready to travel forecfully in the direction of the break.

 

No Guarantees in Trading

 

In some cases, however, these breakouts are “false,” or not truly indicative of changes in the market. False breakouts can happen for a variety of reasons: Erratic order flows can cause choppy trading conditions, there are not enough traders on the side of the break to carry prices further, or we simply have the wrong levels of support or resistance that are truly present in the market. When these false breaks occur, markets are left in a very precarious position, and many traders that bought or sold into the direction of the break are forced to exit their positions. This, of course, sends prices even more forcefully in the direction opposite the break, and leads to increased volatility in the currency pair you are watching.

 

When breakouts are successful, it is because there are usually large amounts of stop losses placed just above and below critical levels of support and resistance. So, when these levels are broken, the orders are tripped and this adds to the momentum seen in prices. But it should always be remembered that there are no guarantees in trading. If traders knew that a large number of stops are at a certain price levels, all we would need to do is place our orders in those areas and ride the wave to constant profits. This, of course, is unrealistic, and for these reasons, breakout trading could not possibly work 100% of the time. Here, we will look at how to play the situations that do not work out as the market had originally planned, the false break.

 

Examples of Breakouts and False Breakouts

To understand how we visualize false breaks, we must first understand how to visualize true breakouts, where violations of critical support or resistance levels leads to increased momentum and extended follow-through. The first charted example shows the structure of a bullish breakout, where support and resistance levels are clearly defined (multiple touches), before prices finally make a clear break to the topside. The second charted example shows a live chart in the other direction (a bearish break). An important element to note is that once prices make the bullish break, they fall back to the original resistance level, which now becomes support (and prices extend higher). For the bearish break, prices rise to test previous support (now acting as resistance) before making a significant drop.

 

Consider the bullish example. What would happen if this level did not act as support? This would mean that a false break is in the works, and traders that bought into the upside break of resistance would now be caught long at expensive prices levels (making their positions vulnerable to substantial losses if tight stop losses are not used). In the third charted example, we can see an early false breakout. So let’s next look at the elements of a false breakout, so that trading opportunities can be identified when they arise.

 

● Price breakout occurs

● Insufficient momentum causes prices to move back through the prior support/resistance level

● Short-term breakout traders are stopped out, and prices reverse violently (such as in the proverbial “short squeeze”)

● Reversal slows once stop losses are covered

 

Reacting to Failed Breakouts

 

Once a failed breakout is identified, you will find yourself in one of two positions: You either traded in the direction of the break and you are looking for a place to exit the trade, or you have no exposure to the asset and you are looking for an opportunity to enter. Traders already in a position will likely need to exit quickly, as reversal volatility can quickly lead to big losses. This is why tight stop losses are essential when breakout trades are opened. Breakout trading becomes complicated, however, when slippage is involved and this is a clear possibility given that these market scenarios are accompanied by extreme increases in volatility.

 

So, how can we structure trades based on false breakouts? The charted example of a failed break comes after an upside breakout. Once prices fall back through the previous resistance level, we have our signal that the bullish breakout was false, and that the bias is now to the downside. Based on this, short positions can be initiated. The main benefit of these types of trades is that we know we are getting in at the best possible price for bearish trades (the upper end of the range, after all upside momentum has failed).

 

For these reasons, trading failed price breaks enables traders to get into positions at the best possible price levels (expensive valuations for short positions, cheap valuations for long positions). This benefit comes in direct contrast to trading valid breakouts, which require traders to enter into long positions at elevated valuations (after resistance has already broken), and to enter into short positions at very cheap valuations (after support levels have already broken).

 

Structuring Trades

 

Let’s assume that we are going to enter a trade based on the failed bullish breakout in the charted example. The short trade entry can be initiated as prices move back through the previous resistance line (as momentum is now in the bearish direction). Stop losses should be placed above the previous spike high. The reasoning here is that any price activity above the breakout high will suggest that an uptrend is in the early stages (with a series of higher highs visible). So, if prices were to overcome the spike high, the original breakout would be a true one and not a false one.

 

Since breakout events typically happen in range trading scenarios, it would make sense to place your profit target inside of the support level of that range. More important, however, is to be aggressive with your stop loss movement. Since volatility is heightened in both breakout and false breakout environments, it is important to reduce risk whenever the option is available. Specifically, this means moving your stop losses to break-even (and even taking partial profits) as soon as your trade is in the black.

 

Once false breakouts are identified and trades are placed, momentum should be on your side and you should see unrealized profits relatively quickly. If this does not occur, it is often a good idea to simply close the position and look for opportunities elsewhere. Being aggressive with your stop losses and profit targets will help you to avoid the volatility risk that is often associated with these types of trading strategies.

 

Conclusion: False Breakout Offer Excellent Price Entry Levels

 

It is true that false breakout scenarios usually involve increased volatility and very erratic price activity. These situations are best managed by short-term traders that are able to closely monitor positions once opened. If this is not your approach, it is unwise to trade these failed patterns. But, at the same time, significant advantages can be found. Specifically, failed breaks allow you to capitalize on the stop loss momentum that is generated by stopped breakout positions. In addition to this, failed breaks enable traders to get in to positions at the absolute best levels, with short entries opened near resistance levels and long entries opened near support.

2011-the-year-of-reversal-2bedf0939e.jpg.ea43319a11f8df9c34d876db5c35da0b.jpg

Breakout-Trading.jpg.8aecfdf802f5307234eeef2c10990b96.jpg

breakout-trading-range.jpg.b40505549f6bfccd11b8ab79b3d702de.jpg

5aa711f463352_failedbreakout.gif.a52733d1c4433fcc28b2c41332bb2093.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • SEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • SEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • USAID (the U.S. Agency for International Development) doles out billions in foreign aid every year. On the surface, this sounds noble—"spreading democracy," "fighting poverty," etc.   But zoom in and you’ll find something weird: why is Land O’Lakes, a butter company, getting $100 million in foreign aid?   It gets weirder.   Yale got money to set up police departments in Mexico. Disney was paid to distribute films to the military. Walmart received foreign aid dollars. And nobody really knows why.   This isn’t an accident. It’s architecture.   At the center of it all is a group I’d never heard of before this podcast: USGLC, the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition.   Sounds boring. Bureaucratic.   But USGLC is a private lobbying group loaded with ex-congresspeople, executives from companies like Pepsi, Walmart, and Pfizer. Here's the magic trick:   They lobby Congress for more foreign aid. Their members sit on the advisory boards of USAID. Then, they “advise” where the money goes. The money ends up going… back to them. They write the laws, steer the cash, and collect the checks.   It's like a Monopoly game where the same five players keep passing Go and collecting $200 while the rest of us are stuck in jail.   DR calls it the “infinite money hack.”   It’s the reason, she says, Congress refuses to stop any of this spending.   But here’s maybe the scariest part:   This isn’t corruption in the Hollywood sense. There’s no smoking gun or sinister villain stroking a cat. It’s not Lex Luthor.   It’s worse. It’s normal. The people involved? They generally don’t think they’re doing anything wrong. They believe they’re saving democracy from collapse. That if we don’t export “influence,” China wins. That butter in Botswana somehow keeps Beijing at bay.   But there are no brakes. No accountability. Just mission creep and endless spending in the name of virtue and security.   And when you follow the money, it doesn’t lead to starving children being fed. It leads to nonprofits growing rich off government grants, lobbying for more grants, and giving themselves raises. Author: James Altucher (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • The part most don’t know: Trump is deadly serious about China and fentanyl.   “In Beijing, if you sell fentanyl on the streets, they’ll execute you,” Ross told me. “But they’ve been subsidizing exports of the stuff that’s killing Americans.”   China executes domestic dealers but allows exports of precursor chemicals to Mexico. Most of it ends up in the US.China knows how dangerous they are but turns a blind eye because it’s not their citizens dying.   Ross says this is personal for Trump. He wants it stopped. And he’s tying it into trade negotiations.   Not with threats.   With leverage.   Rare Earths, Pharma, and the Apple Problem Problem is, we’re addicted to Chinese supply chains. iPhones. Generic drugs. Semiconductors. Vitamins. Ross didn’t deny it. But he says reshoring is starting—and Trump’s policies are finally giving it teeth.   The rare earth thing? A mess. We have the resources. We just don’t process them because it’s dirty, and nobody wants a refinery in their backyard. So we ship it all to China, let them pollute, and then buy it back.   Ross: “It doesn’t make the planet better off to have it processed in China instead of here.”   Makes sense. But the EPA probably won’t love that logic.   Inflation? Recession? Or... Neither? Do tariffs cause inflation? No.   Tariffs did not cause inflation in 2018–2020, despite media panic. Ross argues current inflation claims are more political than economic.   I mentioned Powell saying tariffs will spark inflation again. Ross smiled and said: “I think he's hiding behind that as an excuse not to cut rates.”   Meanwhile, Trump wants to cut energy costs, healthcare costs, and grow the “External Revenue Service.” The goal? Shift from taxing your income to taxing imports.   Ross confirmed a few sleeper details about the tax plan:   Makes Trump’s 2017 cuts permanent Tax-free tips and overtime Incentives for manufacturing here Incentives for foreign investment here And yeah—he also said the reason Trump wanted Greenland? Rare earths.   The Mind Behind the Moves That was just a small part of our conversation.   Whether you love Trump or loathe him, you should understand the game he’s playing. Ross just gave us the playbook.   And if even half of what he said is accurate, we’re entering a new kind of economy. One where tariffs are not just a trade tool—but a tax system. A foreign policy lever. A domestic stimulus.   A weaponized spreadsheet.   You don’t have to agree with it. But you do have to know what’s coming. Author: James Altucher Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.