Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

RussellDaytrade

Members
  • Content Count

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • First Name
    TradersLaboratory.com
  • Last Name
    User
  • City
    New York
  • Country
    United States
  • Gender
    Male

Trading Information

  • Vendor
    No
  1. It depends on an individuals frame of mind. I for one believe the likelihod is for someone to add to their own suite of trade-support tools, that helps them to trade better. That's the goal.
  2. I am seeking someone with whom to collaborate on code writing / implemenation. As I have no code-writing experience, my preference is in working together with someone who does so I can learn some basics. I am currently using NinjaTrader, and codes will be for that platform. As far as communications, an internet phone program, such as skype, or equivalent will work well for direct conversations. Thanks
  3. Per the test results posted, the profit factor of short trades is 2.4 times that of long trades, with no meaningful loss of incidence rates, as compared to long trades. Per the results, 79 short trades, divided into an approx 7 month period, or about 157 trading days, short trades trigger about every other day.
  4. PS How is the 1. poker book you wrote? Feel like giving one away Either you need to detail what you are looking for 1. There's simply nothing here to give anyone a clue 1. someone that is looking for a free meal ticket. As these lines from several of your recent posts clearly indicate, the only person looking for a ‘free meal ticket’, is you, based on your own repeated ‘patterns’. I am happy to report that you are universally incorrect in every assumption and assertion you have made in every post and reply regarding my posts in this thread...congratulations!, you’re batting 100%, 100% wrong, that is. I have every intention of purposefully not indicating to anyone, least of all you, in a public forum, the exact nature of the constructs of my research. The research and results of research I conduct has great value. Not only do you go out of your way to hamper my efforts, (while simultaneously trying to pressure me to divulge information), the irony is that in so doing, you also are dissuading individuals whom otherwise may be inclined to express an interest. You see, anyone that has an interest, must possess not only an interest, but in addition, a willingness to participate, and an open mind in doing so. It is evident you are not only devoid of all the above, but apparently even that is not satisfactory to you, for you go one step further, to try and see to it that no one else does. Now, me being the naturally affable and helpful person I am, am glad to offer you some assistance. Now, as for the research, I derive much useful and empirical data from research I conduct. Again, being the friendly sort that I am, I am happy to share the results of the research below: Over the past 35 years or so of my adult life, (and a few years more as a teenager), I have conducted vast research that indicates conclusively, with near 100% accuracy, and infintesmally minute variation, that trying to reason with an idiot, such as yourself, is a futile effort, regardless of how noble, well-intentioned, or well-reasoned it may be.
  5. Interesting that you are so quick to dismiss and discount things you know absolutely nothing about, reminds of the people who insisted with conviction that the world is flat!
  6. The improvement of intraday set-ups and trade entries, with emphasis on identification of set-ups that offer high-probability definable outcomes. The results and outcome of all research conducted will be shared by those that partake and collaborate, on an exclusive basis. As noted in earlier post, the main focus of the research will principally be in the specific identification of trading conditions that historically yield above 80% probability of a known and expectable outcome.
  7. I am seeking a research partner with access to Tradestation. The scope of the research will encompasss intraday analysis for 2+ years of historical 1-minute data. The thrust of the research is to document and verify, as well as create modelling, of event conditions that yield above an 80% historical expectancy. Individuals with interest in participating please contact me via PM. Tradestation back-testing coding language knowledge and experience a plus. RDT
  8. Hi ST, I use IE. Currently, after clicking link and selecting emini room, (although it occurs for both), the cursor becomes an hourglass, like something is about to happen / loading page, but it doesn't load, and I have to either close the page / browser window entirely, or select another webpage to clear out of the 'frozen' / waiting / loading condition. Sometimes, while it is trying to load, a loading status progress bar appears in IE, but it never completes, and stalls about a third the way into it, after a fairly long load time. Let me know how you think this can be addressed, and or how others that weren't getting thru fixed the problem. The same results occured going directly to, and or clicking the direct link that you emailed yesterday. Thanks, RDT
  9. The chatroom link, or the email link that ST emailed me is still not working effectively in accessing the chatroom. I have tried accessing it every day since last Sat, and so far no-go. Will some of you that have had similar experiences repaly and let me know if and how you solved gaining access. Thanks, RDT
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.