Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

momentom

Members
  • Content Count

    147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by momentom


  1. Firstly, this has to be one of the best posts I've seen on TL. Thanks Frank.

     

    What follows from this is that the result of correctly following Frank's idea is that you would have the best trade location = tight stop + best r/r.

     

    Taking early aggresive entries more than pays for itself. One of the reasons people lose or get faked out is the less than optimal trade location of their entry. You really need the trade to go your way immediately and not take heat.


  2. The key is trade location.

     

    If you are a breakout trader, wait for the pullback so if its chop, it doesn't matter. Your trade off is missing the trade if there is no immediate pullback.

     

    Your other option is to be aggressive and enter early, again to get a better trade location so the chop doesn't matter.


  3. You may want to look at spreading the YM against the FESTX50 future (the Dow50 in Europe). There is one margin issue that the YM is 24 hour market while the FESTX50 trades for 14 hours so you need to watch any overnights.

     

    Try creating a single chart of the spread and then doing your analysis on that as if it was a single instrument.

     

    Lots of opportunity but needs a lot of homework.


  4. The problem here is not which software package. The issue is peoples' expectations from automation.

     

    Markets continually change modes between vertical and horizontal activity. Without building something into a trading system that copes with this phenomenon, expectations will not be met as the forward testing data will most certainly be different to the backtested data on which the system was tuned.


  5. Before you decide on an application that you have to pay for monthly, have a look at fin-alg's MP. The latest version lets you overlay it on any bar chart. There is also another product that also provides historical VAH, VAL, VPOCs and more.

     

    Not connected to them but a happy customer for a couple of years. BTW, you use these add-ins with Ninjatrader which is free.


  6. I'm using MC for my testing and Ninja for my trading. I can export data out of Ninja and test it against ideas in multicharts. I'm a discretionary daytrader so this works fine for me. also mc is easy to use for strategy creation - something i haven't mastered in C# ninja speak. You can also get delayed data at a reduced cost from esignal and use that for your testing if you cover a lot of markets.


  7. Hi Tams

     

    I'm using 24 inch too and have also considered going to a bigger size. I think its really a matter of the resolution you are going to use. There is an issue of both the monitor resolution capability and your graphics card resolution capability.


  8. There seems to be a huge difference in volume readings between the data feeds. The Zenfire hourly volume readings for June ESTX50 futures for 9Apr09 is:

     

    31634

    92958

    53213

    45217

    44452

    25823

    192561

    142542

    103964

    134185

    35400

    15041

    17087

    17183

    318

     

    951578 = Total

     

    Obviously, we are not all looking at the same movie. I believe it has to do how the data is sampled and transmitted, whether its raw data or whether "something" is done to it to make it more "friendly" to the data suppliers transmission requirements. Those of us who find volume important have a lot of extra due dilligence to do. At the moment, the consensus of people I speak to say esignal or CQG has the truest volume. So those who are trying to use their brokers' feed for charting/analysis have a lot of work to do before deciding on following that course.


  9. Been trading with IB for over 5 years and have only needed to speak to a human 3 times.

     

    Highly recommended but use a front end like bracket-trader to make your trades although IB's TWS has much improved functionality since I first started with them.

     

    BTW, their day trade margin for futures is MUCH higher than most brokers so if that is a consideration then go elsewhere.


  10. One of your issues in NZ is internet latency.

     

    Have a look at the times it takes to ping a server in the U.S. from NZ. Try a number of times during the period you want to trade as well as what would be quiet times. One of your issues is how you connect to your ISP and then how your ISP connects to the internet.

     

    One tool for this would be

     

    http://www.speedtest.net/

     

    Once pass this test, the try pinging the broker's server you would connect to to trade and compare.


  11. Mirus looks not very customer friendly. Had many accounts over the last 20+ years and looked at Mirus to use Zenfire with ninjatrader as an additional broker.

     

    I made contact, filled in the forms online, heard nothing and despite two emails to a specific person have not had an account number after more than a week. Doesn't bode well for customer service when I really need it so I will try somewhere else.


  12. I think that the concept behind this "system" is that you only trade in the first hour or so after the RTH market opens while the market is finding its balance. It is at these times that the countertrend trades have the highest probability of success.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.