Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Understanding Liquidity in the Forex Markets

Recommended Posts

When most potential traders start to research the forex markets, most of the common explanations describe foreign exchange as the “largest and most liquid market in the world,” and then go on to cite number of transactions that are made on a daily or weekly basis. In many cases, these articles will also compare the forex to the number of regular transactions that are seen in the stock or bond markets, and, of course, these numbers equal the proverbial “drop in the ocean” when compared alongside one another. But despite the frequency with which these facts are printed, traders will usually disregard liquidity as an important factor when trades are placed.

 

This type of activity is surprising, especially when these areas are disregarded by technical analysts or charting traders. Liquidity is one of the central issues to consider when determining the likelihood that a certain level of support or resistance will hold and continue to remain valid. To be sure, liquidity in the forex market can be confusing to new and old traders alike. Since the forex market is so large, it can be difficult to determine liquidity levels with a high degree of accuracy. But there are still trends that can be identified, and certain market behaviors that are repeatedly seen during certain time of the year. Periods of economic data release also exhibit certain characteristics in terms of market liquidity, so it does make sense to have an understanding of how these factors will influence prices when levels trading.

 

Liquidity vs. Volatility

 

It should be understood that liquidity is measured in terms of the active number of buyers and sellers that are available for transactions in a market at any given time. If I am trying to sell an asset at $100 and there are no available buyers at that price, markets will gap to the next available price. If I am able to find a willing buyer at $100, we can complete the transaction and there will be no gaps in the market price. In this second hypothetical, we are seeing the effects of a transaction in a market with higher liquidity levels. For active traders, this will generally mean that these markets will experience reductions in volatility.

 

In some cases, however, markets can be both volatile and liquid at the same time, but this is usually the result of external factors (such as major news headlines or significant market data). But the strong liquidity levels that are present in the forex market should be viewed as a strong positive when compared to other reforms of trading. The $4 trillion in daily transactions will generally ensure that you are able to get in and out of the markets at the price you want, and will also help trading probabilities in regions of clearly defined support and resistance (since there is a reduced likelihood for false breaks).

 

Examples of Price Extremes

 

If we think back to the Credit Crisis of 2008, we can remember that anyone trying to sell a home missed the benefits of market liquidity. Credit and available cash was much more difficult to come by, and this prevented some home sales from completing, as the negative impacts snowballed. What about a case where a stock trader finds himself on the wrong side of the market (shorting) as the news is reporting that the company is being bought at a premium during afterhours trading? In both of these cases, individuals found themselves in a situation where they could not “exit a trade” at the desired time and price because of the low level liquidity conditions in that were seen in the market environment.

 

While these extremes are not seen to the same extent in the forex markets, there was still major declines in forex market volatility in 2008, and many major price gaps were seen. It should also be noted that the majority of the volatile activity in 2008 was in the downward direction (for stocks and high yielding currencies), and this is no coincidence. In the attached chart, we can see the 2008 price activity in the EUR/USD.

Price gaps generally accompany market uncertainty, so, for certain asset classes, this is a very bearish scenario. This is another way changes in market liquidity can give traders an indication of where asset prices are likely to head next.

 

Signs of Significant Liquidity Changes

 

Since changes in liquidity can have a major influence on trades and trading decisions (giving validity to price levels, and helping determine potential direction), it is important to have an idea of when these changes are likely to occur. A market that is highly liquid might also be referred to as a “deep” or “smooth” market, and this is because the number of active traders is “deep” and overall price activity is usually “smooth.” Some currency pairs have greater liquidity than others. The most commonly traded pairs (such as EUR/USD, USD/JPY, and GBP/USD) will have might higher liquidity levels (and more stable price action), than pairs like EUR/HUF, USD/NOK, or USD/MXN.

 

When managing risks (setting stop losses) liquid markets offer better protection levels. This is because the enhanced volatility that is usually seen after a major break (typical areas for stop placement) can lead to price gaps and more substantial losses. For this reason, some traders stick to liquid markets (commonly traded pairs), traded during stable times (not after data releases or during periods of extreme uncertainty).

 

Spotting Times of Declining Liquidity

 

Since forex is a 24 hour market, there is no added element of session closing (such as what is seen with stock exchanges), but there are still many situations where declines in liquidity can lead to dangerous price gaps. If, for example, a major interest rate announcement or high-interest news event might jar market expectations. In other cases, prices might see gaps as forex market open initially during the Monday Asia session (Sunday night in North America). Price gaps are much less common in forex markets (some studies suggest that 0.5% of forex price activity occurs during a gap), and there are some times during the day that bring reduced liquidity (such as session changes), and these times will be especially important for scalpers and others using short term strategies (which generally require tight stop losses).

 

Asian session hours tend to be less active (favoring range bound strategies), while the London and US sessions tend to be more active (prone to large percentile moves and breakouts), but this activity tends to taper off during the afternoon periods in both areas. Additionally, market periods tend to slow during the Summer months and mid-month periods, while the end of the month will often see activity spikes as a larger number of investors square positions.

 

Conclusion: Stay On Top of Market Liquidity and Its Impact on Prices

 

Most traders tend to disregard the impact of liquidity and the related impact that this can have on price action. When dealing with less liquid currency pairs (or times when markets are holding off from establishing positions), markets are prone to see larger price moves - and these price moves tend to favor certain types of strategies. For these reasons it is important to have a handle on liquidity and its implications, as this can lead to positioning processes that are more streamlined and efficient based on what markets are likely to encounter going forward.

images.jpg.01ddedb5f44b9f6aed2876338c4d7665.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice

 

A market order takes liquidity off the market.

Limit orders add liquidity to the market.

 

 

 

The price (bid/ask) that you see is:

Bid: The highest (best) buy limit prices( the highest price that limit buy orders are placed)

Ask: The lowest (best) selling limit prices ( the lowest price that sell limit orders are placed)

 

In the case of few seconds before a major news release spreads widen because the liquidity providers (banks etc) withdraw their orders from the market, (because if the new is "market moving" then there might be an agressive one-side move which they will not be able to hedge against) thus making the difference between the price levels of the orderbook bigger. That means that the distance between the Bid/Ask prices described above widens because the orders 'waiting' at the orderbook are less.

 

While in periods of low liquidity, since the distance between the orders in the orderbook is larger, and the volumes waiting to be executed are smaller, the price moves sharper because there is more distance to move from level to level and the volums at each level are smaller.

 

A market order can move the price to another level if it consumes the liquidity that exists at that level. If there were only limit or stop orders placed then the price would stand still.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.