Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

lastninja2

Estimating How Violent a Puke-out Will Be???

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This could take a bit of explaining... let's see if a picture can help:

 

http://s3.postimage.org/pmlxk4w6r/puke_volume.png

 

Basically if the market seems to have settled in to a range-type day, rotating around an area of high volume in the middle, is there any way at all of estimating just how severe the reaction might be if either of the extremes of the day (the upper resistance, or the lower support) are broken?

 

One idea I came up with was to use Cumulative Volume Delta to somehow estimate how "short" or "long" the market is, and therefore give some indication as to how many contracts will be "puked out", in the event that the market strays too far from the high volume area for players to bear.

 

I am not expecting to get some magic formula haha, but can anyone offer any insight besides "rely on your experience, you will come to learn that a typical puke-out on the bund is 7 ticks" etc etc.

 

Much appreciated - I can clarify if the above did not make any sense!!!

 

thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to clarify: I am particularly interested in the initial puke-out. The knee jerk reaction over the first several seconds/minute or two.

 

my CVD idea was just an example of a random approach I thought up, but would welcome alternative suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One idea I came up with was to use Cumulative Volume Delta to somehow estimate how "short" or "long" the market is, and therefore give some indication as to how many contracts will be "puked out"

 

Hi Lastninja,

 

I tried to do exactly this last summer (it's a bit like trying to compile your own intraday COT report on the fly!), but I couldn't get it to work. Unfortunately I can't remember why, which probably isn't very helpful to you . . .

 

One definite problem is that you can't know the trading horizon of those hitting the bid or lifting the offer in these zones - if they're a trend-following fund establishing a position they'll hold for the next five months then they won't get puked out when the market goes a few points against them.

 

Another problem is that you don't know whether buying is to establish or to cover a position, and likewise whether a seller is shorting or just closing a long.

 

I would guess that maybe participants become more panicky around breaks of the high and low of the day than they do in trading ranges, but that's just a hunch.

 

Hope that gets you thinking at least . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thanks for the response - intraday COT report haha I didn't think of that way.

 

Good to hear that it wasn't a totally stupid idea, although your point about horizons - fully agree.

 

Still, I'll keep an eye on CVD over the coming weeks. Perhaps the occasional peculiar CVD reading can provide a red flag when especially large puke-outs are in prospect, even if that CVD reading is diluted with long-term traders/closing trades rather than initiations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear that it wasn't a totally stupid idea, although your point about horizons - fully agree.

 

I don't think it's a stupid idea and I didn't mean to totally discourage you! I would guess that the answer is more likely to be found in volume/order book data than price, as you suggested - it's just having a smart enough way to break it all down.

 

Regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.