Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tradewinds

The Science of Highs and Lows

Recommended Posts

Looking at historical price bars and trend lines on a chart tell very little about the real behavior of price. All kinds of things happen intra-bar that are not readily apparent on a static, historical chart. For example, if the price bar had a lower low; did the price bar have a lower low at the open, and then shoot up and close higher? Did the price bar open high and close with a lower low? Did the lower low occur first or last? Was there a lower low with a close down or a close up? The answer to all those questions provide a more complete picture of what the price behavior really is.

 

Higher lows and lower highs can be particularly tricky. For example, let's say that you see a higher low on this current price bar or an indicator at the open of the bar, and take that as a signal that price is moving up, only to experience the bottom drop out during the last few seconds of the bar formation. You must understand at least two fundamental truths about highs and low's. Highs can't go any lower, and lows can't go any higher; but highs can go higher and lows can go lower. Think about it. Once a new price high has been made, that price high for the bar can't go lower. So if your strategy depends on a higher high being made, then once it's made, it's reliable information. The same with lower lows.

 

Higher lows are important information, but higher lows can not be certain until the open of the next bar. By then you may be to late. Plus you can't tell if that higher low will hold until the second bar. Let's say that this bar looks like it will have a higher low, so you watch it, but low's can go lower, so you don't know until the next bar opens whether it's really a higher low or not. But what do you do in the meantime? And how long do you wait to make a decision?

 

So it's very difficult to time higher low's and lower highs. This illustrates why the open of the next bar is so important, and that there may be a very short window of time when there is any certainty of anything. There are very short windows of certainty followed by longer periods of uncertainty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking at historical price bars and trend lines on a chart tell very little about the real behavior of price. All kinds of things happen intra-bar that are not readily apparent on a static, historical chart. For example, if the price bar had a lower low; did the price bar have a lower low at the open, and then shoot up and close higher? Did the price bar open high and close with a lower low? Did the lower low occur first or last? Was there a lower low with a close down or a close up? The answer to all those questions provide a more complete picture of what the price behavior really is.

 

Higher lows and lower highs can be particularly tricky. For example, let's say that you see a higher low on this current price bar or an indicator at the open of the bar, and take that as a signal that price is moving up, only to experience the bottom drop out during the last few seconds of the bar formation. You must understand at least two fundamental truths about highs and low's. Highs can't go any lower, and lows can't go any higher; but highs can go higher and lows can go lower. Think about it. Once a new price high has been made, that price high for the bar can't go lower. So if your strategy depends on a higher high being made, then once it's made, it's reliable information. The same with lower lows.

 

Higher lows are important information, but higher lows can not be certain until the open of the next bar. By then you may be to late. Plus you can't tell if that higher low will hold until the second bar. Let's say that this bar looks like it will have a higher low, so you watch it, but low's can go lower, so you don't know until the next bar opens whether it's really a higher low or not. But what do you do in the meantime? And how long do you wait to make a decision?

 

So it's very difficult to time higher low's and lower highs. This illustrates why the open of the next bar is so important, and that there may be a very short window of time when there is any certainty of anything. There are very short windows of certainty followed by longer periods of uncertainty.

 

H/H and L/L are great tools but need to used only when it is time to manage a trade. They have very little to do with the identification of a trade entry. It would be easier and probably more effective to throw a dart at a chart for entry rather than price bars. The best way to identify an entry is by staring at the order flow to gauge what side of the market is going to give and act on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the ultimate questions in trading is:

 

  • Where is the Top? and
  • Where is the bottom?

 

And the answer is, that you can never know for sure. But you can determine how probable it is that a bottom or top will occur under certain circumstances. And that is the best you can do.

 

So even though lows can go lower and highs can go higher, but highs can't go lower and lows can't go higher, you can guess at where the top and the bottom might be.

 

I like oscillating indicators because they will only stay on one side of the zero line for so long. Yes, sometimes they fail to go back over the zero line, but they will also only go in one direction for so long. So even if the oscillator fails to cross over the zero line in the opposite direction, it usually only goes in one direction for so long. So you can guess at where the price is in the wave cycle.

 

When I buy highs and sell lows, the profit report doesn't do very well. Oscillators keep me in sync with the price cycle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lows often run into strength and pop high as highs snap from weakness and go lower. As long as you are in the right part of the cycle!!:)

 

Yes, there are strong highs and weak highs, and strong lows and weak lows. For example, you could get a price move down that is average, but a much greater than average selling volume. In that situation, sometimes price "coasts" lower from all that momentum built up from the selling.

 

How do you personally measure strength or weakness? I measure it mostly with the NYSE $TICK for trading the ES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking at historical price bars and trend lines on a chart tell very little about the real behavior of price. All kinds of things happen intra-bar that are not readily apparent on a static, historical chart. For example, if the price bar had a lower low; did the price bar have a lower low at the open, and then shoot up and close higher? Did the price bar open high and close with a lower low? Did the lower low occur first or last? Was there a lower low with a close down or a close up? The answer to all those questions provide a more complete picture of what the price behavior really is.

 

I know this is slightly off topic, but it a really important point which people need to acknowledge when they are looking to see whether a strategy works or not. That's that looking simply at historical charts to get a feel for whether an idea is good or not can be very misleading. The eye tends to be drawn to where the strategy seems to have worked or at least clearly failed. So many things happen while trading that strategies can easily give signals which just get steam rolled in real time. Many people use backtesting(and forward testing) to really work out whether the strategy might work. I'd trial the strategy simulated to be sure though.

 

I think the strong or weak extremities as you put it, in order flow terms are rejections and tests, or responsive activity and the market drying up. They definitely will create different conditions after they have been put in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.