Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Can Underlying Issues Move Futures?

Recommended Posts

Hello Traders,

 

I'm still relatively new to trading and I was wondering if you guys/gals can shed some light on what's been happening with the markets over the past week.

 

Basically, I've been having reasonable success trading YM(mini-dow) by focusing on the movement of the underlying issues of the DJIA. I have a very basic signal to alert me as to when to buy contract(s), however I won't enter until I see strength in the underlying issues in the direction inwhich I want to take the trade. I use the opposite method to get out i.e. when I see weakness in the underlying issues.

 

As I've mentioned, its been working quite well for me, however over the past couple of weeks the strength of the underlying issues simply won't move the YM. There have been situations, (even as I write this post) where every single issue of the DJIA has been trending up but the YM still won't move with the issues.

 

Now, I'm assuming the mini-dow would follow the underlying issues of the DJIA, unless told otherwise?

 

I'm beginning to think the past few months was just luck.

 

Can someone please advise if they believe observing the underlying issues as a method to trade Minis, whether it be S&P 500 for es-minis or DJIA for the mini-dow is a feasible/viable method?

 

Now, I'm aware that the markets are simply wild at the moment and no matter which direction the strength of the market is at any moment in time it seems to be turning in the opposite direction in a split second.

 

As you've probably guessed I day trade.

 

For those that take the time to respond, please be constructive in your comments with pros/cons.

You comments, suggestions and advice will be very much welcomed.

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The DJIA is made up of 30 stocks - that is what I meant by underlying issues.

 

Cheers

 

Ok, thanks. So your platform has a ticker symbol for the 30 Dow stocks, or do you have some custom calculation, or custom indicator?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carlton,

 

 

I'm beginning to think the past few months was just luck.

 

 

Not completely actually. You have to refine your strategy further.

 

Your basic assumption that the underlyings will influence the price of the index, the YM (mini-dow)in this case, is 50% correct. In the sense that the Index can also anticipate the price earlier and the underlyings will adjust to the index. So it works both ways. Seizing this mis-pricing is what sophisticated traders call 'index arbitrage' .

 

For straight forward technical analysts the trick is to identify which is leading the Index or the underlyings.

 

Jose Kollamkulam

Chennai

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Carltonp,

 

As I have observed price behavior of the indices mainly from the ES, the price has nothing to do with the underlying issues. The price is always there where diverse stakeholders (the big guys / market maker) want. They have different trading technics or better said tricks, to manipulate the quotes/price in their direction without really buying or selling big amounts of contracts. That is with a little experience observable in level 2. And that is also the reason why you con observe up days in the indices with more down volume (sometimes triple, quadruple) than up volume - and vice versa.

 

See the exchange and trading arena as a casino where the cards and roulett table are manipulated and expect the unexpected.

 

Hope my article helps and don´t discourage you from trading. All the best,

 

Abde

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

For straight forward technical analysts the trick is to identify which is leading the Index or the underlyings.

 

 

Chennai

 

Jose, thats brilliant mate - I was getting some negative feedback elsewhere. It was suggested that I use another index instead of DJIA because so many people use it. It was suggested I use NQ.

 

What do you think?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Abde,

 

Thanks for your insightful input. Its interesting that you say that price has nothing to do with the underlying issues. There are days when I would totally agree with you, then there those from other forums, and here at TL that disagree with you.

 

I'm even more confused now :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Carlton,

 

 

 

Not completely actually. You have to refine your strategy further.

 

Your basic assumption that the underlyings will influence the price of the index, the YM (mini-dow)in this case, is 50% correct. In the sense that the Index can also anticipate the price earlier and the underlyings will adjust to the index. So it works both ways. Seizing this mis-pricing is what sophisticated traders call 'index arbitrage' .

 

For straight forward technical analysts the trick is to identify which is leading the Index or the underlyings.

 

Jose Kollamkulam

Chennai

 

Jose (Traders)

 

It has been suggested that I use another another index to measure YM rather than the underlying issue of DJIA, because they are Arb'd to death and as a result there is no edge from observing the underlying issues to trade YM. Would you (Traders) agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Abde,

 

Thanks for your insightful input. Its interesting that you say that price has nothing to do with the underlying issues. There are days when I would totally agree with you, then there those from other forums, and here at TL that disagree with you.

 

I'm even more confused now :confused:

 

Carltonp,

 

Sorry for the confusion but that was not my intention. I have just comment what I have observed in my trading career. And as long as no one can plausibly explain the phenomenon of up/down days on contrary volume I will stick with my estimation. My recommendation is to observe the ES as the biggest and most liquid futures index in the world to assess trading desicions. You will see that all other markets follow. Try it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Carltonp,

 

Sorry for the confusion but that was not my intention. I have just comment what I have observed in my trading career. And as long as no one can plausibly explain the phenomenon of up/down days on contrary volume I will stick with my estimation. My recommendation is to observe the ES as the biggest and most liquid futures index in the world to assess trading desicions. You will see that all other markets follow. Try it out.

 

No worries mate.

 

I will try out ES in my trading decisions and let you know how I get on.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trade winds

 

I have a custom Excel calculation.

 

I use the NYSE $TICK, NYSE Advancers/Decliners and NYSE Up/Down volume for signals for the emini SP 500. I have custom programs that format and break down the data. I find that the underlying data is very helpful in understanding why the ES does what it does.

 

The behavior is often extremely subtle, and difficult to read, but the data tells a story. But it's all how your process and interpret it.

 

Obviously the market has been volatile, which can affect how you interpret what's going on. What might have been a big price move to start a new trend, with more volatility, might just be a retracement. It's all relative.

 

The ES has different price patterns. Sometimes it will turn on you for no apparent reason. Sometimes the trend will go into a very choppy, stepped pattern. The nice, easy trend patterns only happen at certain phases of the day.

 

So, the correlation you have seen in the past, that seem to not be valid anymore, would imply to me that either the way you are processing the data is incomplete, or the correlation is not consistent, and you need to keep looking for something that has a more direct cause and effect relationship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Obviously the market has been volatile, which can affect how you interpret what's going on. What might have been a big price move to start a new trend, with more volatility, might just be a retracement. It's all relative.

 

So, the correlation you have seen in the past, that seem to not be valid anymore, would imply to me that either the way you are processing the data is incomplete, or the correlation is not consistent, and you need to keep looking for something that has a more direct cause and effect relationship.

 

This is exactly the problem I'm having right now. I thought I was in a good place with markets and then the last couple of weeks has thrown me for a loop. My custom excel program to track the components of the DJIA as a means to confirm my signals to enter a contract with YM was working beautifully for months and now it seems to turning on it's head whenever it tells me the YM is moving in a certain direction.

 

I'm going to take the advice of other traders and start focusing on ES, but trading another contract doesn't solve the problem.

 

As you correctly mentioned the correlation I had in the past is no longer valid, but I've had to pay a high price to find that out.

 

I have been using the NYSE $TICK, however I will start using the NYSE advancers/decliners and the NYSE up/down volume in my Excel application.

 

Can I ask what custom programs you use to format and breakdown the data?

 

Also, how do you process your data?

 

When I was monitoring the 30 stocks in my Excel program in realtime as a means of confirming the direction of the YM was working sooooooooooooo well, but now it's not working so well.

 

Thanks for your input.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask what custom programs you use to format and breakdown the data?

 

Also, how do you process your data?

 

Any data can be broken down into quite a few different aspects:

 

  • Highs and Lows
  • Price Highs and Lows


  • Data Highs and Lows


  • Price Highs Compared to Data Highs


  • Price Lows compared to Data Lows


  • Momentum
  • Price Momentum


  • Data Momentum


  • Price Momentum compared to data Momentum


 

It's an exercise in comparing matters of degree and relativity.

 

Then there is the speed at which price is moving. You need to take into account shorter and longer trends. Trend behavior that doesn't make sense in the short term may make perfect sense within a bigger context.

 

I programed my own indicators. Right now I'm using TradeStation. TradeStation provide NYSE $TICK data in Composite form. Symbol $TICKC - NYSE Tick Composite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.