Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

rocky9281

Trading F&O by Time and Sales

Recommended Posts

Quotes lagging (quotes are not nearly as robustly updated as trade are) or simple 'bad ticks'.

 

Hello Blowfish,

 

Thanks man. :)

 

Can these same reasons be used to describe (1)trades below the bid and (2)trades inside the bid-ask spread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ rocky9281

 

First and foremost, you misquoted me, you omitted the word hypothetically in your #1 quote. Your assessment of Q1-Q6 is dead on, it is impossible to trade outside the bid/ask spread.

The exchange will always match the closest bid/ask and execute at that price, end of subject...... and expand and contract the spread if/when needed.

 

I cant figure out on what basis you are saying all of them are correct. One group completely criticizes the other.

 

For second part,I cannot relate HFtraders/short lived IOC orders with trades below bid, above ask, inside trades etc.

 

Can you explain them with more details please?

 

 

If you're a small retail trader (like me) and are not connected to one of the exchanges co-location servers, we are forced to trade against an approximation of the only true order book which exists on the exchanges computers. That's the sad fact :(

 

Data transfer or latency is one of the demons in the T&S closet, this is where the trades outside/inside the bid/ask are spawn. These trades are only outside/inside the latest bid/ask spread as it is sitting on our computers not the exchanges "Master Order Book." Even the exchange will footnote their T&S data with "fast market conditions" remember we're talking in 1000ths of a second (milliseconds) here, a lot of trading can happen in a few seconds when the "bots come alive." So no trade is left behind, the order book at the exchange is always cleared and is always right, it is our DOM and T&S data that is slow to print.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Blowfish,

 

Thanks man. :)

 

Can these same reasons be used to describe (1)trades below the bid and (2)trades inside the bid-ask spread?

 

Yes, though inside there are possible other reasons too. e.g. off the top of my head two limits being placed 'at the same time' (in theory there is no at he same time) at the same time between BB & BA, one to sell, one to buy. Or a limit buy and a stop sell inside should be matched (I think) depending on the precise details of the matching algorithm. They occur a bit more often (inside) though are still pretty rare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
e.g. off the top of my head two limits being placed 'at the same time' (in theory there is no at he same time) at the same time between BB & BA, one to sell, one to buy.

 

Hello Blowfish,

 

The way you described about inside trading,it appears to me that these kinds of orders are placed because the buyer wants to buy from ONLY a particular seller and vice versa. They have planned that no third party can take part in that trade. So the buyer and seller have pre-planned about the price, size and time of the trade and accordingly, they "meet secretly with each other and run away after the trade is complete".

 

This is what I am feeling about inside trades.

1. Please correct me if I am wrong.

2. Is this inside-the-spread trading made by the pros? or normal retail traders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can be either it is more a function of the type of order and how orders are matched by the exchanges matching algorithm.

 

Edit: By inside I mean inside the best bid/ask rather than some sort of market insider.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last group of questions:

 

1.What can be inferred if we see trades going on (1)"above the ask/below the bid" AND (2)"inside-the-spread"?

 

2. What can be the future impact on the price due to trades going on (1)"above the ask/below the bid" AND (2)"inside-the-spread"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Last group of questions:

 

1.What can be inferred if we see trades going on (1)"above the ask/below the bid" AND (2)"inside-the-spread"?

 

2. What can be the future impact on the price due to trades going on (1)"above the ask/below the bid" AND (2)"inside-the-spread"?

 

Outside not much, bad prints, implied trades....ignore. Inside similar however there are papers that I have seen (that seem pretty plausible) that this often happens when volatility becomes high round the open, news, closes etc. Anyway I would focus on what is quantifiable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When transactions occur at the ask price, there are two kinds of forces that play simultaneously.They are:

 

1. The LIMIT sell orders (consisting of the best ask), and

2. The MARKET buy orders (consisting of those orders that does all the buying from the best ask as mentioned in previous point).

 

Please tell me whether I am correct up to here.

 

At this stage,we interpret the transactions as the professional players are buying. What is the reason to think that the pros are buying here and not selling? In other words, what is the reason to think that the pros are the people who are owners of the market buy orders (point #2 mentioned above), instead of thinking that the pros are the owners of the limit sell orders (point #1 mentioned above)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When transactions occur at the ask price, there are two kinds of forces that play simultaneously.They are:

 

1. The LIMIT sell orders (consisting of the best ask), and

2. The MARKET buy orders (consisting of those orders that does all the buying from the best ask as mentioned in previous point).

 

Please tell me whether I am correct up to here.

 

At this stage,we interpret the transactions as the professional players are buying. What is the reason to think that the pros are buying here and not selling? In other words, what is the reason to think that the pros are the people who are owners of the market buy orders (point #2 mentioned above), instead of thinking that the pros are the owners of the limit sell orders (point #1 mentioned above)?

 

You got it it on 1 & 2. Have you looked at market delta/ cumulative delta? These types of studies simply plot volume@bid and volume@ask rather than get into the intricacies of reading the tape print by print. Reading the tape print by print is a lot more art, pace of transactions, how orders are refreshed (or pulled), how one sided the book is etc.

 

The basis for how these indicators are viewed by many is indeed that the 'important' orders are the market orders. Those that use market orders are often refereed to as 'aggressive buyers' or 'anxious buyers', they are prepared to pay up (pay the spread) for immediacy. They need a fill now.

 

Did you check out the books I mentioned? Also check early threads by a trader called Futurestrader71 (not at this site). There is a little ebook called NoBSTrading that details a few specific DOM/trade patterns.

 

If markedelta/cumulative delta thing appeals I can suggest a few places to check out too though google will get you there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You got it it on 1 & 2. Have you looked at market delta/ cumulative delta? These types of studies simply plot volume@bid and volume@ask rather than get into the intricacies of reading the tape print by print. Reading the tape print by print is a lot more art, pace of transactions, how orders are refreshed (or pulled), how one sided the book is etc.

 

The basis for how these indicators are viewed by many is indeed that the 'important' orders are the market orders. Those that use market orders are often refereed to as 'aggressive buyers' or 'anxious buyers', they are prepared to pay up (pay the spread) for immediacy. They need a fill now.

 

Did you check out the books I mentioned? Also check early threads by a trader called Futurestrader71 (not at this site). There is a little ebook called NoBSTrading that details a few specific DOM/trade patterns.

 

If markedelta/cumulative delta thing appeals I can suggest a few places to check out too though google will get you there.

 

Hello BlowFish,

 

I am very much new to tape reading. :( Don't know what to study and what not to study. Please guide me to the following as you mentioned:

1. Market delta/ cumulative delta (I am confused whether you are favoring or against it. If you are against, I don't want to study that)

 

2. Please give me the Link to threads by a trader called Futurestrader71

 

3. Where can I download NoBSTrading?

:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recommended a couple of inexpensive books in post 9. You can google the other stuff I mentioned. If you get stuck let me know. There seems to be a change of policy on links so I am a bit more apprehensive about posting them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rocky,

 

I'll add to the book list. This book cleared up many of the misconceptions I had about computerized trading and offered valuable insight as to just how elaborate the orders can be inside professional algorithmic trading systems. I believe you have a good grasp on the T&S strip and combining that with "what works for you" will serve you in good stead.

 

Amazon.com: Algorithmic Trading and DMA: An introduction to direct access trading strategies (9780956399205): Barry Johnson: Books

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to BlowFish and $5DAW.

 

Just a couple of queries.

 

1. While buying and selling, do the pros use market buy and sell orders instead of limit orders?

 

2.Blowfish, I have gone thru Tape Reading And Market Tactics & Studies in tape reading.But neither of them has concepts like-pace of transactions, how orders are refreshed (or pulled), how one sided the book is etc. (or did I miss them?). So I think I should start with the other resources directly. Your comments please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks to BlowFish and $5DAW.

 

Just a couple of queries.

 

1. While buying and selling, do the pros use market buy and sell orders instead of limit orders?

 

2.Blowfish, I have gone thru Tape Reading And Market Tactics & Studies in tape reading.But neither of them has concepts like-pace of transactions, how orders are refreshed (or pulled), how one sided the book is etc. (or did I miss them?). So I think I should start with the other resources directly. Your comments please.

 

There are many sorts of market participant with different agendas and different ways of doing business. As I said before what you can say is that anyone that uses a market order demands immediacy.

 

I can't recall if they talk about 'pace', I seem to recall it's hinted at.

 

Don't think I know the book (though may have just forgot).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think I know the book (though may have just forgot).

 

Ok,Thanks.

 

Please do me another favor, please don't forget to tell me your thoughts about the teachings on this book, after you have gone thru it.Its in module 2 (pg86-pg157). I will wait for your reply. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok,Thanks.

 

Please do me another favor, please don't forget to tell me your thoughts about the teachings on this book, after you have gone thru it.Its in module 2 (pg86-pg157). I will wait for your reply. :)

 

To be honest I don't plan on going through it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am attaching 2 screenshots. The first one is in black text.But actually they were all in red-every trade executed at bid-in a single price level.

 

The second one all green -every trade at ask-in a single price level.

 

Please tell me-does the first one tells to short immediately and the next one buy immediately?

Copy.PNG.34a48e832465b7f8b5f11bd47164f14d.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Can you please explain the following sentence:

 

"When there is more depth on the same side of the market, limit orders are relatively more expensive than market orders because of (1)an increase in the execution risk and (2) competition from the existing limit orders."

 

1.What is meant by "execution risk" here?

 

2.does "competition from the existing limit orders" mean that other limit orders may get filled before my limit orders ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Competing with other limit orders is a form of execution risk. Basically execution risk is the risk that a transaction will not execute completely within the price limit you have set.

 

2) yes, limit orders on most excahnges work on a FIFO (first in first out) basis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is described in NoBsTrading.

 

"The market is sitting at 05 bid/06 offer.The person bidding 1,500 at 05 pulls his bid. As soon as the market goes 05 offer, he buys whatever is offer and puts his bid back up."

 

Please clarify the following things:

 

1.What does it implies when we see bids getting pulled in the trading screen? Bearishness?

 

2. How did the market go 06 offer to 05 offer? Does this has something to do with bids getting pulled? Please explain .

 

3.Why did he put his bid back up again?

 

4. Is this guy buying with both market(at ask) and limit orders(at bid)? How do we distinguish and identify this person in T&S?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do they report un filtered, un coalesced data? Do they report bid/ask info? If so there should be no reason why not.

 

I am attaching a T&S screenshot of the exchange under consideration.

 

It seems they are reporting bid/ask info aren't they?

 

Regarding reporting of un filtered, un coalesced data, how to know whether they report them or not? Does this T&S shows these are reported?(I don't know what is meant by un filtered, un coalesced data )

 

If not, please tell me how to find out whether the concerned exchange reports these.

TS.jpg.730078f148ba25e6f005f49798be080e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.