Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I actually attended an Options Animal Seminar last week (Dont hit the back button yet - LOL) and the presenter made an interesting point. Most of the training that's out there, especially paid training) focuses on ways to get into a trade.:

  • Technical Indicators
  • Chart Patterns
  • Price Action
  • Trading Setups/Strategies

 

Yet, they tend to not address what to do while in a trade. We all know that emotions can cause us to do things that destroy our trades. Exiting trades too soon or Holding on to losers way to long.

 

So, I wanted to ask the forum what strategies you use to manage a trade

 

For me, I control emotions by clearly identifying my risk / reward before entering the trade. I manage my expectations. I know we are supposed to be unbiased, but when you put on a trade, you do have an expectation.

 

In addition, I ask the following question to try and identify why the criteria that I set and followed to enter the trade may have changed:

 

What has changed about the trade?

  • Is it fundamental? - The company has been cooking the books
  • Is it Technical? We broke a key price level
  • Is it Sentimental - typically fast move in one direction and then returns
  • Is it Macro Economics - Economic Calendar Events

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I place the majority of my attention where I spend the most time ... waiting for the context and setup to signal entry ... but I agree that the time one needs to be most disciplined is when the emotions are likely to be strongest. The reason is that the right context and setup lead to a 75%+ win rate to first target and there is almost never any manual intervention in that trade.

 

So for me, the phases of trading are:

- waiting for context to be clear and then for the setup to appear

- taking the setup

- setting the stop mechanism (I partially automate my trading so I don't have to watch every tick) and the initial target

- managing trade, which mainly consists of doing a few sit-ups and slow breathing to disperse any stress for the 1-30m my average trade lasts, but may include a manual exit

- resynchronizing myself like a tennis player so that each trade, like each serve is treated independently of every other serve in the game.

 

In the managing the trade stage I have an extremely specific set of reasons for manually exiting or altering the automatic exit. All are purely technical:

 

. 3rd advancing swing

. 3rd attempt at same break

. Confirm reversal by 3 pts

. Opposing ma color w/o channel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Example of using CCI for exit management:

notes on chart should clarify

 

"3 Strikes & Out".

three attempts by CCI to get back above +100 fail

exit when CCI crosses below ZL (zero line)

 

Re-entry:

CCI TLB (trendline break),

CCI crosses above BOTH -200 and -100

Swing Low Pivot occurs:

5aa710533767f_RAI3strikesexit.thumb.png.9605348f7b74891056c3e1753c56bf76.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.