Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

throughthemud

FX Ellioticians

Recommended Posts

Here's a corrected count from my last post. The larger wave is still unknown but I think the probability of it being wave i (circle) of minor degree 3 is the most likely because of its size. The wave is too small to be the entirety of wave v (circle) of minor degree 1 and is too large to be wave (i) of v (circle) unless we're going to have two extended waves in minor wave 1 which I'm not sure is possible. If it is possible it is very unlikely.

eur01-16-10.thumb.PNG.8518af00ef1ac94386668e8e158c6e49.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... waves 1,2,3,4

...wave 5 yet to come... pretty obvious from the chart i would think

 

... could be wrong of course

elovemer,

don't post in this thread if you're not going to explain what you're posting and it should have some relevance to elliott wave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My short term count. I think we'll see a fairly quick d, e and then a much large 5 wave drop followed by a rise to about 1.4445 - 1.4455

 

EDIT:

There's a good chance that what I labeled a-b-c is actually just c and a is the last high before that. I chose the scenario I posted on the chart because it makes it easier to get to 38.2% retracement. Just keep that in mind.

eur01-18-10.thumb.PNG.1d2e6088cd72aa3f548570ad229b9136.PNG

Edited by throughthemud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having thought we were at the end of a key 5th wave I'm going to put out there the possibility that what I took to be a complete 5th was actually only the 'a' of an ending diagonal triangle on the 15min chart - if we see 3 waves up to a 'd' then I'll be looking for confirmation of an 'e' and the possibility of a long

 

VR

20janendingtriangle.thumb.gif.93002e980f3e3adf46397731a679a9ad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having thought we were at the end of a key 5th wave I'm going to put out there the possibility that what I took to be a complete 5th was actually only the 'a' of an ending diagonal triangle on the 15min chart - if we see 3 waves up to a 'd' then I'll be looking for confirmation of an 'e' and the possibility of a long

 

VR

 

Apologies for the duplication - for the sake of not wasting it...an updated chart

20janendingtriangleupdate.thumb.gif.96fa39d893566f5d44fe93a0c6e42f62.gif

Edited by VILLAFILLER
duplicate post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a very rare event especially for a 5th of a 1st. I wouldn't expect that pattern except if it was a large degree 5th. This may be the 3rd wave of the intermediate degree first. My primary count is that this is the 5th wave of the wave started 11/26. I think the 1.618 x wave 1 puts us in the 1.40s somewhere or you might try to find resistance in a .618 ratio to wave 1 & 3. I'll post a chart tonight if it's not over by then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem just don't go betting a bunch of money on it. Here is a chart of my count on wave v (circle) of 1. I believe we have started wave i/a of (a) of 2. This should be a very good retracement. What happened in gold is probably a good example of how the euro will act in this correction.

eur01-20-10.thumb.PNG.ee7c3f1ea6a8f603709efb8be20c06e9.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is a very rare event especially for a 5th of a 1st. I wouldn't expect that pattern except if it was a large degree 5th. .

 

Ending diagonals are actually very common at all degrees of trend, and can be the fifth wave of any of the 3 motive waves.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In at 14088 based on

 

equality of my 1st wave drop from the 26th Nov and this (my fifth),

nice 5-wave drop yesterday

Existing level at 86

Divergence on 1hr momentum

1hr volumes suggest last low was a fifth

61.8% retracement of this mornings small TF rally

 

But hey...been wrong all this week so far:doh:

 

VR

21janlong.thumb.gif.e2b6b5f61e10d4f2c16ef75636b64bfa.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I must be misreading the majority of those diagonals. or maybe I'm just ignoring them because I haven't recognized too many but I know you've been doing this a lot longer than I have thales

 

I am no EW expert, that's for sure, but these diagonals, I have found, are especially common in the currencies. You were right in that when one occurs in an impulse that it indicates an end to a larger degree move,but that move need only be larger by 1 degree. You also will sometimes see them appear seemingly out of no where, in which case one of two things is happening: 1) the ending diagonal is appearing as the "C" of an ABC correction, or 2) sometimes, though rarely, in the "A" wave of a zig zag. I usually do not try to drill down further and subdivide the waves within a diagonal, I just look for the diagonal itself to form and reverse.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you just helped me clear up a major misconception I had. After that last wave 1 it dawned on me that a lot of times I see that overlapping pattern and think it is a b wave but after your post I'm pretty sure it's actually the 5th wave. I don't have a good chart to look at right now to verify this but I will later. This mislabeling has probably caused me confusion before. If I'm right the most common position I've seen a diagonal in is the 5th of a 1st.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I'm right the most common position I've seen a diagonal in is the 5th of a 1st.

 

I cannot say from my experience where the statitical map of this pattern is like. I use EW more for a swing to swing basis for day trades, and thus I am not typically trying to determine whether a swing is wave 5 of 5 of 5 of V of 1 of A, so to speak.

 

However, the psychology behind the ending diagonal is that market participants are worrying that the move has, in Prechter's words, "gone too far too fast." It sort of makes sense then, that it would be during the last impulse of the first move that could lead to such a sense of having gone too far too fast. After, by wave three, everyone now recognizes the direction, and the dog pile is on, right?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have something else, from last night, that's interesting - I'd like to know people's opinion..

 

Yesterday morning there seemed to be a nice, neat 5 wave drop forming on the 15 min...which I was looking to to form THE bottom of this drop (see attached)

 

All seemed to be going by the book until the US unemplyment figure which skewed (read screwed) my 4th and pushed it into the territory of 1...however the price then turned and travelled the same distance it should have in an ideal, EW 5th without the ue number...

 

Not sure if I'm explaining myself properly...it seems like we had news (in the direction of the imminent turn) that turned a text-book 5 into a rule-breaking 5 (4 into territory of 1) with a truncated 5th (truncated by the amount of the ue 'displacement').

 

And then we got the anticipated turn...

 

Really just a point of discussion rather than seriously proposing EW rules could break down when a turn 3 or 4 degrees higher is due

 

VR

21janguess.thumb.gif.b37505a57b74066a218ec91b193ede81.gif

21janrule.thumb.gif.3937812b3762df33af75a1b683a973e6.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use EW more for a swing to swing basis for day trades, and thus I am not typically trying to determine whether a swing is wave 5 of 5 of 5 of V of 1 of A, so to speak.

 

Here is an example of how I use EW to trade. This is the 6B futures contract (GBPUSD) with my wave count of the decline off of the high. I use EW to sort of "map" a tradable nove, but I am not trying to put this decline from last night through this morning into any larger EW context.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18339&stc=1&d=1264513631

 

I just took this one as it looks like that wave 4 rally, such as it was, may be over and new lows are ahead. Of course, that wave 4 may be a wave 1A, and this may be 2B decline and a larger 3C rally is to follow. A break below the day's low would indicate wave 5 is underway (unless we get an irregular wave B), and my wave 5 targets are noted on the above chart.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18340&stc=1&d=1264513986

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18340&stc=1&d=1264513986

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fb582936_2010-01-266BWaveCount2.thumb.jpg.1e10252c764db63280c8086bf04a3704.jpg

5aa70fb5881ca_2010-01-266BWaveCount3.thumb.jpg.17a5e85a95ec8c79dd7460aeeff4115b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my counts for the long-term and today's business - finally the turn I've been looking for?

 

VR

 

Divergences on all timeframes from 5min to 4h on the stochastics and MACD

Reversal candle patterns on 15min & 1hr

Existing S&R level dating from Summer last year @ 14053

 

P.S. The move from 26th Nov could be a reversal or a correction...either way I favour the upside for intraday/week swings unless this gets negated

26jan15mincount.thumb.gif.46fa5724988b793b3e1a31195a28fae9.gif

26jan4hrcount.thumb.jpg.5e5fe0e3af152abd7dcd90adf1a98381.jpg

Edited by VILLAFILLER
Change chart & reasons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's my counts for the long-term and today's business - finally the turn I've been looking for?

 

VR

 

'Tis a turn, but of what degree remains to be seen, right?

 

I don't have time to work up a chart, but I can count five waves down on the ES, so at least a temporary bottom is in place I would think. Still, a very impulsive decline of the highs to the lows, so I would anticipate more downside to come after a decent retracement of the decline.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'Tis a turn, but of what degree remains to be seen, right?

 

I don't have time to work up a chart, but I can count five waves down on the ES, so at least a temporary bottom is in place I would think. Still, a very impulsive decline of the highs to the lows, so I would anticipate more downside to come after a decent retracement of the decline.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Sure...I've found to my cost over the last week that it doesn't pay to to play for turns on the higher degrees...this does seem to be 5th of a fifth at least so should be good for some pts...certainlt not going to sit on the long if this starts to go sideways

 

VR

Edited by VILLAFILLER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi...been a while...

 

I was thinking this weeks rise was the start of turn on the drop from 26th Nov but decided that it wasn't really acting impulsive enough...

 

so...

 

I sold the end of what seems to be an ABC

 

Top of wave 2 of Friday's drop

A=C

C=161.8% projection of B

B is a very neat expanding flat abc

coincidence of the top of two channel lines

 

Time will tell

 

VR

5aa70fc181847_abc2feb.thumb.gif.ec1ec6b021f50c1e2b1d88f534cb7897.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me this last drop certainly seems to be wave i (circle) of 3 down when the sizes of the waves are related. This correction should take us to 1.4128 minimum but I wouldn't expect anymore than that unless wave (a) takes us there. As I type this we are at the point where wave iii of (a) equals wave i of (a). It should shoot up quickly soon. If it does not then it is more likely that this is indeed wave c of (a) as in the last chart villafiller posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.