Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mastertonster

Newbie Question: What is Market Maker's Role in Bid/ask?

Recommended Posts

Hi, stock trading is pretty new to me. And I'm here to hopefully learn from you experienced traders about all things related to stock markets.

I have some basic understanding of the market but I have a long way to go. My questions may sound stupid but here they are..

From my understanding, at any given moment, bid is the highest purchasing price some buyer had entered his order for. And the ask price is the lowest a seller had enter his sell order. I also understand that market makers are suppose to take the opposite side of the trade whenever someone enters the order. But it sound kind of weird. If I were to buy at Ask, who am I exactly getting the shares from? the market maker? or some counter party- a traders like myself who has entered a sell order priced at the Ask..

Another question is, I've heard all the stock transactions have all become electronic in recent decade. Do market makers still exist? Where are they physically? Were they the one's standing on the exchange floors hollering back and forth?

Can someone please explain? Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Were they the one's standing on the exchange floors hollering back and forth?

Can someone please explain? Thank you.

LOL most everyone is hollering for the good ole days especially the floor boys now that the flash boys have appeared in all their cunning and might.

 

If it is any consolation charts still look the same...generally i.e. Trends...pull backs...ranges..breakouts..more trends..strong (spikes and breakouts)...channels (weaker trends), sideways (ranges), more trends strong and weak...PB..then breakouts or ranges...over and over and over again ad nauseam. At least the hollering and screaming added some diversion to such a boring job. Now days you have scream at the computer or jump on top of the desk and shake the daylights out of it. 70% or more of trading is via cold..unfeeling..drab...computers that use algos and htfs powered by the computers which in turn are obeying calculating humans. It is the invasion of the machines. In the old days one could mess with the MM's and specialist. Now one is pitted against the machines. They can still be beaten though because algos are devised by humans and until human nature changes there will always be trends...breakouts..channels...ranges..flags..pennants..triangles...etc more ad nauseam. It simply is not as fun beating a machine as beating another human in the markets. Nevertheless, the money is there and it can be taken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, stock trading is pretty new to me. And I'm here to hopefully learn from you experienced traders about all things related to stock markets.

I have some basic understanding of the market but I have a long way to go. My questions may sound stupid but here they are..

From my understanding, at any given moment, bid is the highest purchasing price some buyer had entered his order for. And the ask price is the lowest a seller had enter his sell order. I also understand that market makers are suppose to take the opposite side of the trade whenever someone enters the order. But it sound kind of weird. If I were to buy at Ask, who am I exactly getting the shares from? the market maker? or some counter party- a traders like myself who has entered a sell order priced at the Ask..

Another question is, I've heard all the stock transactions have all become electronic in recent decade. Do market makers still exist? Where are they physically? Were they the one's standing on the exchange floors hollering back and forth?

Can someone please explain? Thank you.

 

Hi Mastertonster,

 

You have the basic idea, so answering your question is easy enough . . .

  • Orders can be divided into two types: passive and active.
     
  • Passive orders are limit orders. They're placed on the order book at the exchange, and will sit their until an Active order fills them. Think of Passive traders as "patient" traders.
     
  • Active traders are "impatient" - they want their order filled now! They use Market orders. They just agree to buy at the lowest price that a Passive trader is willing to sell at (the Ask). Orders that are 'stops' are Active: until price reaches the stop level they are stored on your broker's servers, and then they become a Market order.
     
  • Here's an example . . .
     
  • The highest bid is 98. The lowest ask is 101. The gap between them is known as the Spread.
     
  • If you want your Buy order filled right now, who do you trade with? The best available counterparty is the person who is willing to sell at 101. So you must cross the spread and buy from them at 101, paying 3 ticks more.
     
  • If you try to Buy 50 shares and the Passive sellers at 101 are only offering to sell 20, then you will become a counterparty to the Passive sellers at 102, and so on . . . If the number of Passive sellers is low then your order will be filled at increasingly higher prices - this is known as "slippage".
     
  • If you're willing to be patient, then you can simply join the queue of people willing to buy at 98 by placing a limit order at that price. What you're hoping is that some impatient seller will cross the spread and start selling to the Passive limit order buyers at 98.
     
  • However, this may never happen, or there might be so many people ahead of you in the queue that the Active buyers are exhausted before you find a counterparty.
     
  • If you're Passive you know the exact price at which your trade will execute, but you don't know whether it will happen or not.
     
  • If you're Active then you can be certain that your trade will execute, but you cannot be sure at what price.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moving on to Market Making . . .

 

  • The market maker attempts to earn the spread on each trade. In doing so, they act as counterparty to both Active Buyers and Active Sellers, and therefore facilitate trade, literally "making" the market.
     
  • As a market maker you will typically act passively, having both buy and sell orders in the market at any one time.
     
  • Ideally what you want is for an Active Seller to match your bid at 98 (making you long), and then an Active Buyer to match your ask at 101 (making you flat). This round trip just earned you the spread - 101-98=3 ticks profit.
     
  • Market making has always been a lot more complicated. You might have orders in the market in hundreds of stocks at any one time. Your risk becomes more complicated as soon as you hold a position (you want to complete a round trip as quickly as possible). So you might begin to skew, or "lean" your book, having slightly more sell orders than buy orders, for example.
     
  • Also, having access to the information about the willingness of informed Active market participants, you might begin to develop a slightly longer term directional view of the market, causing you to lean your book further to take advantage of this.
     
  • Much of what HFTs do is just a super high speed version of this, in which computers identify mathematically optimal scenarios based on available information, and can adjust your book in milliseconds as this information changes. Being computers, they can also do this across thousands of markets, internationally, at once.
     
  • Market makers in stocks were typically guys with computers (not HFT) on the floors of stock exchanges. Market makers in options and futures were typically the guys shouting in the pits of futures exchanges. They both did a similar thing. And both have now largely been replaced by HFT.

 

Hope that all makes sense - please ask any questions!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BlueHorseshoe, thanks for your thorough explanation. Those are definitely helpful to my learning of the market. If you don't mind I follow up with a couple more questions.. I wanna see if I understand correctly. So, in any given moment, with any stock, any bid/ask spread. The prices at Bid or Ask are "passive orders" entered by Market Makers? what about people like myself? Are my buy or sell orders(say lower than bid or higher than ask) buried within a long queue of orders? Sorry. I'm a little confused. :doh:

I understand market makers' job is to provide liquidity in the market, but then why are certain stock have so illiquid and have huge bid/ask spread? Does this mean they're not involved in the particular stock? Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlueHorseshoe, thanks for your thorough explanation. Those are definitely helpful to my learning of the market. If you don't mind I follow up with a couple more questions.. I wanna see if I understand correctly. So, in any given moment, with any stock, any bid/ask spread. The prices at Bid or Ask are "passive orders" entered by Market Makers? what about people like myself? Are my buy or sell orders(say lower than bid or higher than ask) buried within a long queue of orders? Sorry. I'm a little confused. :doh:

I understand market makers' job is to provide liquidity in the market, but then why are certain stock have so illiquid and have huge bid/ask spread? Does this mean they're not involved in the particular stock? Thank you.

 

Hello,

 

Sorry for the delayed response!

 

The Bid & Ask are always "passive" orders, but they're not necessarily Market Maker's orders. You too can post a limit order and be passive - just wait to see if it gets filled.

 

Where your orders sit in the queue will depend on the contract/security and the exchange it trades on.

 

Stocks on the NYSE will, I think, still have Market Makers (known on that exchange as 'specialists'). They probably get priority on fills (ie their passive limit order is moved to the front of the queue regardless of when they join), I can't remember for certain though.

 

An instrument like the e-mini S&P futures contract, which trades on the CME, is operates on a FIFO basis ('first in, first out'), which means no matter who you are you join the back of the queue at the time you join. The only way to become front of the queue is if the orders ahead of yours are either cancelled or filled.

 

I am not certain, but I think I recall that there are still (electronic, and probably HFT) a form of Market Maker for these futures products as well, called "designated liquidity providers". They get perks (rebates, waived exchange fees etc), but not priority in the queue.

 

With regard to wide spreads . . . the spread is only as wide as you and other traders make it. If you post inside the spread you will narrow it. In very liquid instruments the spread is kept at the minimum price increment of one tick or one cent at all but the most volatile of times. I can count on one hand the number of times I've seen a two tick spread in the ES last more than the blink of an eye.

 

Finally, all various forms of Market Maker have specific mandates to work with. A common requirement is that they maintain both a bid and ask at all times (needn't be the best bid and ask though). Another is simply that account for a certain volume of trading per day. Market makers and market-making algorithms from electronic trading firms may still be present when the Bid and Ask are wide - they just don't see any need to help narrow it by posting inside it. Remember, they make their money from the spread, so they want it wide.

 

If you have any more questions then let me know and I will do my best to answer.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A tactic that some traders used alot in the past was to scan several stocks for an abnormal wide spread in that particular stock and place an inside bid to buy ..limit order..and then when filled place and inside offer to sell thus attemping to take a slice out of the wide spread. Or vice versa on the short side. They would look at the size of the present inside bid and offer to determine where the pressure was..i.e. long or short side.... and then implement the technique accordingly. This could be done over and and over until the MM or specialist ...if NYSE.... determined what one was doing and narrowed the spread thus removing the opportunity.

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A tactic that some traders used alot in the past was to scan several stocks for an abnormal wide spread in that particular stock and place an inside bid to buy ..limit order..and then when filled place and inside offer to sell thus attemping to take a slice out of the wide spread. Or vice versa on the short side. They would look at the size of the present inside bid and offer to determine where the pressure was..i.e. long or short side.... and then implement the technique accordingly. This could be done over and and over until the MM or specialist ...if NYSE.... determined what one was doing and narrowed the spread thus removing the opportunity.

 

I guess you could even do this simultaneously in numerous stocks to try and remain delta neutral to any sudden sector or index shift?

 

For the OP: if what Patuca is discussing is of interest you might like to do a bit of research into the 'SOES Bandits'. I'd also recommend Scott Paterson's book 'Dark Pools'.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.