Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
Heisenberg
-
Content Count
41 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Let me make an educated guess: the answer is volume related? H.
-
Nobody has this chart (5 min from Trade Navigator) ? H.
-
Are you sure that's a ve? Shouldn't the ltl start on bar 2 in this case?
-
I've annotated the attached traverse as I think how it should/could be annotated correctly. It was posted and heavily discussed a while ago, but I believe there are a few things that can be learned from this chart. The last up tape is imho hidden by the fact that we have an outside bar. This bar contains decreasing red as well as increasing black volume. That is why the first part is non dom decreasing red, and the last part of it can be seen as a dominant increasing bar. Your comments are welcome. H.
-
Spyder said this would be the best way of self-learning, by starting from something known. (and work your way backwards trough it) 1. One should know this by knowing that every previous channel/traverse/tape/... had been completed at this point in time. 2. At 14.15, also being point 1 of the new channel/traverse/tape/sub tapes/.... 3. I do not know the answer on this one yet. 4. See answer 3. I suspect this has to do with how peaks and troughs behave? 5. Let's just say you lost me already at 3. This also implies it is usesless (for me) to look further at this point, because I'm missing too much to move things forward. In other words: something happened on the end of the 14th that made the channel fanning, I have always assumed that only the internals (yellows) and non dominant laterals created fanning. Perhaps I should replace "non dominant lateral" by "non dominant faster fractal"? This also implies that we did have a complete channel on the 14th, but that the channel fanning event made the channel bigger. (and reordered everything inside, changing the fractals) H.
-
Can anyone post this chart without annotations? (preferably from Trade Navigator) H.
-
On the attached annotated chart from jb, we see a down traverse. As we all know a traverse is built with 3 tapes. This implies that pt1 to pt2 is a tape, as well as pt2 to pt3 is a tape. Now, the question is, how comes that the first tape has about 30 bars (and is built from several faster fractals), and the second only 2 (not built from faster fractals) and are at the same time both tapes? I'm not asking for the solution, but a little push in the right direction would be awesome. H.
-
I don't know about this one, I remember spyder saying that everything boils down to a binary choice. H.
-
I deserve the same as anyone here in the forum: nothing. I wasn't impolite, I just told the truth. False assumptions? Please.... H.
-
Only the peaks? The troughs don't matter here in this case? thanks, H.
-
That someone happens to be Spydertrader. You know, the person that started this thread.
-
So I ask a question about PA, and I get answers about other annotation possibilities? What use does that serve? I know it's a traverse (from spyder earlier in the thread), and I want to know why it is one, not 20 different ways to annotate a chart. H.
-
I was wondering, on the attached chart, would the last black up traverse be a case of pace acceleration (PA), and as such be a "promoted" traverse (from being initially a tape)? H.
-
I don't know if you noticed, but Jack isn't always very clear when writing stuff. I choose not to read from him anymore... H.
-
Would the image in attach be a good start to understand fractal nesting? Showing tape, traverse, channel. H.