Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

# zak

Members

7

1. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

Prior to bar 79, I do not see a medium non-dom Gaussian half R\ that tells me there must have been the medium B2B just before it. So, I read a long skinny b2b(2r2b)*5 sequence forming the medium B2B. Bar 79 is the highest volume, the peak of the full Gaussian, confirmed by next day's double top on lower volume and a skinny r2r(2b2r) forming the missing medium R\. Insisting on a LTL that has this P2, projects the RTL far (?) into the future, depending on a soon (?) to be developed P3 that corresponds. There is only one geometrically possible point (7/17 bar 73). Based on volume (and geometry too), I get CH 2 before this geometric traverse P3 (I find this odd; 7/16 bar 76). If it is a tenet of the market that a P2 must exist after P3 of the faster fractal which builds this point, than I do have TR P3 on 7/16 bar 50, TR P2 being on 7/13 bar 28.
2. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

First day of Channel Drill: 7/13 - only one tape from P1 to P2 of 1st traverse
3. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

My view of today and attempt at PFC: wmcn: 60: still rr tracking LAT; P2 still ahead 15/5: up traverse sequence
4. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

My attempt at PFC: PFC 2009-08-13 what's there: what must come next: 60: up tape D LAT (rr tracking) => P2 non-dom way to P3 15: up tape structured LAT => P2 down tape down sequence completion (do structure: nd-D) to P3 5: up traverse up traverse bo + D LAT down traverse P2 nd 15 up structure for down traverse P3 D 15 dn structure for traverse completion for CH P3 up traverse sequence for 60 up tape and 15 up structure
5. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

Hi Spydertrader, a very nice thread. I would very much like to see and do drills covering this period.
6. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

A look at the 15m chart of the drill snip - I can see that an up traverse must be wrong. There is a r2r2b2r sequence which corresponds to the tape on ehorn's chart. Ruling out down and up traverse, it only can be a tape. For me it's hard to grasp that sub-tape or sub-sub-tape gaussians become visible on a 5m chart in the way they do. When I look at the low volume levels, I get there. What I get: Sub-tape sequences and bars roaming free (getting away without touching a tape line) are a feature of low volume periods. Before the snippet, on the way up, there is no 5m traverse change signal within the dom tape and a non-dom down tape sequence is what must come next. The down tape begins with a stich (to dec vol bar) followed by non-dom internals, a sub-tape sequence leads to skinny r2r. The sub-up-tape is non-dom; seeing the 'b2b' @ EH and the low dec volume, and it breaks the sub-down-tape on dec volume. After the tape P3, while unfolding, is it possible to know that the sequence will be built from a visible sub sequence or is it something to discover? (At the traverse P3 the Ym provides a SfC [after breaking out of a lateral].)
7. ## The Price / Volume Relationship

hi non-dom down tape r2r2b2r R\ dom up tape b2b2r2b /B non-dom down tape r2r2b(sub-skinny inside [OB tape])2r R\ for (a fanned) traverse P3 dom up tape b2b2r2b /B
×
×
• Create New...