Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

Corey

Members
  • Content Count

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Corey


  1. this women get it

    I have been trading for the past fifteen years using many different indicators — you name it and I have probably traded it.

     

    Triangles

    Elliott Waves

    MACDs

    Moving Averages

    Trend Identifiers

     

    They were all part of my tool kit. There was only one HUGE issue. I would have numerous winning trades, only to be knocked backwards by a couple of losers. Trading was a constant uphill struggle — I would take three steps forward, two steps back.

     

    Frustration was often my best friend!

     

     

    Then a friend told me, look trading is simple — WE make it HARD. Traders have to learn to trade volume and price, not just the color of the indicator. Volume and price LEADS all other indicators.

     

    WOW, if only it could be that easy!

     

     

    I have discovered that trading really is that easy using 3 very simple steps:

     

     

    Candlestick charting because it is easier on the eyes and traders can easily identify all the key price points without squinting.

     

    Volume LEADS price, it really is that simple. However, most traders don’t understand where to analyze the volume. I analyze volume at two critical areas:

     

    Support and Resistance area

    Overbought and Oversold areas

    ...


  2. I've had a lot of success with this method. While I'm grateful to spyder for his insights and guidance, most of my success came through self-discovery,...

    this is only way imho.

     

    Additionally, for many months now I've been mentoring a group of close friends, many of whom have left corporate employment and are now trading profitably full-time. So hang in there - IT CAN BE DONE!

     

    finally we have another trainer. :shocked:


  3. Few observations... not trying to compete but just stating the obvious.

     

    1. What is the "specific" pattern? Steve, you mention "specific algo pattern". But you don't even describe a general pattern to any degree -- let alone a specific set of rules for identifying the pattern algorithmic-ally.

    ..

    he already high-light it, price was maxed out at 2 sd.


  4. Todays progress - this fractal channels and FTTs give a total other view to the chart than these LL-HL-HH-LH logic sequences. Really interesting.

     

    -swisstrader

    ETluker also stopped posting after coding an auto channel. What happen to them? Did they get a mid-night phone call telling them to stop posting or else?


  5. I have attached a chart which shows Spyders toolset for TN and the other chart shows regular volume based on up/down colour coding based off the close. See the huge discrepancy. One is decreasing black the other is deceasing red.

     

    Would like to hear people's thoughts.

     

    Thanks

    based on this TN vol coloring is more advance than NT vol coloring.


  6. That is crazy.

    If this is true, it seems to make sense.

    Back when Huddy mentioned he was getting his Seriese licenses and said he was setting up hedge fund and to email him for info....I did think it was odd and strange and out of the ordinary for live room owners....

     

    If this is true, how is it confirmed?

    just twitte him Google


  7. Fractal Jumping

     

    I sometimes jump to a finer fractal unintentionally. Would like to hear from others and how they corrected it.

     

    This tends to occur more often around fanning out of pt3. Looking back it is easy to see it but in real time this is not the case.

     

    Thanks

    get into habit of juggling more than 1 fractal and monitor to see which fractal it is following other than that I don't know what to tell you.


  8. Very much so.

     

    If I remember right, the TN toolset recalculates the pace lines based on the last 20 days, but I never learned the algorithm. I am pretty sure that the original pace lines were calculated off a statistical breakdown of bar volatility by volume and separated into categories, but I doubt that Trade Navigator is doing that on the fly. Still, it can't be as simple as moving averages with a modifier, unless the modifier is very complex, otherwise they would maintain proportional spacing.

     

    If anyone can provide some insight into how pace levels are determined, that would be fantastic.

    you can google anything for example google 'pace site:http://www.traderslaboratory.com' to find any mentions about pace on this site likewise for other site. Found a pace doc from other site

    adding pace to trading channels.doc


  9. ...

    I have guesstimated current pace lines, from Vienna's most recent chart:

    46000

    37000

    29000

    18150

    8250

    1200

    ...

    numbers seem high compare with what coded in pv vol4.

     

    Add(new Line(Color.Gold , 25000, "ExtraordinaryPace"));

    Add(new Line(Color.DarkGreen, 12500, "FastPace"));

    Add(new Line(Color.DarkGreen, 10000, "MediumPace"));

    Add(new Line(Color.Blue , 6000, "SlowPace"));

    Add(new Line(Color.Blue , 4500, "DryUp"));

    Add(new Line(Color.Red , 2500, "VeryDryUp"));

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.