Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
Neoxx
-
Content Count
8 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Neoxx
-
-
It is great to have an active discussion of the method again. It is entirely possible to have a sharp, clear discussion without resorting to things 'pissy and snippy', such as condescension, ad hominems, misrepresentations, etc. It is most frequently the arrogance of ignorance which gives rise to such manoeuvers and as true discussants of the method we are above all that.With respect to these methods, I agree that discussion can be valuable if one party is a definitive source (aka transference). Otherwise, the perceived benefit differs enormously from the actual benefit.
IMO, one creates an appropriate ego by putting it on the line and and building it anew when necessary. This should not be a big deal for anyone, although it does take a little practice to get used to doing it. The reward is new knowledge. Multiple moments of 'doh' will inevitably lead to a fabled 'aha'. If you experience a few 'haha's' at your own expense on the way to the 'aha', that makes it even better.Differentiation is the path to ahas and 'new knowledge', and ego has no place there.
-
Sorry Neoxx, I thought I had discovered something about P2s and wanted to share this by testing romanus's assertion, nay tenet. It was a useful discussion for me at least. I shall keep my own counsel from now on.Spyder is a valuable - but finite - resource, and this thread represents a unique opportunity for a lot of people, from those barely out of the starting blocks, to others (myself included) who may have stumbled at certain steps on the path to differentiation.
In the brief life of this thread, Spyder has already crystallized a number of important points, clarified certain others, and provided an accessible and up-to-date roadmap for continued progress.
I meant nothing personal, and hope I haven't deterred you from continuing to actively participate in this thread.
I simply meant it's in our collective best interests to foster an atmosphere conducive to clarity, candour and Spyder's continued input.
-
I, for one, would be very disappointed if this thread became embroiled in debate, discussion and verbal sparring, for which the other contemporary thread may serve a better arena.
We're grateful to have Spyder back, as what may be a 'last gasp' effort to bring everyone up to speed, and, at least in my opinion, the onus should be on promoting maximum utility.
I sincerely hope this thread does not become derailed, teeter on the brink, and plummet into the precipice.
-
I came unstuck when I was reliably informed that the period from 11:05 to 13:05 on the attached chart was "just a tape".....I suspect the 11:50-12:50 lateral may have had something to do with that...
-
This Morning's non-dominant traverse.If the price pane were blanked out in this example, should we still know we have a traverse rather than a tape?
If we were expecting a Dominant (rather than a non-dominant) traverse, would the same answer hold true?
Many thanks,
Neo
-
-
I use Faststone (also free)FastStone Image Viewer, Screen Capture, Photo Resizer ...
pretty powerful program
you can draw your arrows, then re-position it on the chart... a very handy feature not found on most drawing programs.
I second this... really versatile application.
The Price / Volume Relationship
in Technical Analysis
Posted
Exactly.
Discussion is a poor substitute for differentiation, where the answers come from the market itself.
However, if one chooses to advance their knowledge via discussion, IMHO it should be with someone who has the answers and can act as a guide, rather than someone still searching for the answers themselves.