Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

CrimeStopper46

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • First Name
    TradersLaboratory.com
  • Last Name
    User
  • Country
    United States

Trading Information

  • Vendor
    No
  1. This thread is NOT to promote your education business Mav. Keep up the chatter I am working on a part II from another popular vendor.
  2. The system didn't cost 15k...thats how much $$$ I lost using it. The cost of the 3 day course and all the indicators packaged together was like $1700. I did it with my dad so we split the cost. The company is not longer in existence but that is how I was introduced to futures. I wrote the guy an e-mail everyday showing the "discrepancies" between the "profitable" trades he had on the the site and the signals the system actually fired off. Finally he got so sick of me he just stopped responding. (talk about standing behind your system and company) I tried making slight adjustments to the system thinking I could get it to be profitable. Finally after about 6 months I had lost $15,000 and decided to start over from scratch.
  3. Thanks for the posts guys, I knew someone would be familiar with what I was taking about and call him out. Which is fine. You guys are on the same wavelength as me. I posted this in the Beginner's section to warm people just starting out. Sevensa's posts were getting to me and glad to see you guys appreciate the work I did putting the room calls and chart together. If you guys have experience with any other vendors please share. I like using facts and stats rather then just saying XYZ vendor is a rip-off stay away. Have a great rest of the weekend, see you guys on the battlefield Mon. hehehehehe
  4. Yes I am, made money everyday this week. So I can't complain. Thats fine if you wanna play devil's advocate. Healthy debate is how problems are re-contextualized(that can't be a real word). If you wanna talk about something concrete (ie. trades, numbers etc.) that would be good. What I don't care for is questioning my motives and integrity. All the unsavory vendors should be forced to follow some sort of regulation IMO. These guys are getting rich selling systems and indicators etc. that simply don't WORK. I lost money for 6 months when I started using a system that just didn't work. The track record on the vendor's site was awesome, but in the real world the results could never be matched. I'm trying to keep others from making the same mistakes I did when I started. I dumped 15k into this system before finally giving up on it realizing that the approach I was using would not work. I put this thread together to warn others and YOU tell others(by posing your reply) that my motives are questionable and I am not experienced enough to have a valid opinion. What is YOUR motive?? To defend a vendor who's material you have never seen?? I HAVE taken the course. That is enough for me to comment on it. You HAVEN'T so you really have no place. I'm done with this thread unless Someone else posts some reply's that they got something useful out of this. who cares anyway, I don't even know why I am replying. Have a great weekend all and GOD bless.
  5. Been reading through your posts sevensa, it seems you are very quick to criticize the work of other people. ALL YOUR POSTS point out the faults in other peoples posts. Not to mention questioning their intelligence and integrity. Maybe you should post some of your own work rather than telling others how wrong they are.
  6. Oops, the above post has my responses to sevensa's questions INSIDE the quote bubble.
  7. I mentioned why above. I don't want to recieve any personal attacks. I am just posting my experience. I see you are very sceptical of even me, good for you, thats kinda the point I'm trying to make is not judge things at face value. I could create a website with 100% accuracy over 5 years, with a disclaimer in small print at the bottom and no impartial, unbiased source could verify it. ONLY someone who had taken my course could say I was fudging my numbers. Maybe they would make a thread on Traders Labatory and call me out. I don't know
  8. Obviously the vendor posts good calls in the room, that's not the point. I was showing how their is a "fudge factor" that all rooms of this type that I have come across use. I was a subscriber to this room for one month of a monthly subscription. I don't "keep going back day after day" as u say. I am not posting the name of the vendor because its not just this room but all the rooms of this type I have come across. I was going to post other techniques used by other vendors I have tried, but I am not really getting the feedback I thought I would. Its just an idea I had that I thought would make an interesting thread. Of course I have an ax to grind Sevensa. DO YOU THINK it is moral for this vendor to post 2 losing trades as 2 winning trades?? Newer traders looking for education look at that Track Record and assume it is legit. I am using an alias to protect myself. I have many posts on many sites and I don't want any personal attacks like I have seen happen on other sites(elite trader). I am doing this as sort of a Consumer Reports for trading "education" websites. I spent a few hours putting together all this information and creating as understandable a thread as I could. Hope all had a profitable day today. I am flat and green so I can't complain.
  9. Here is what was written in the "official" track record for the trade in question. Sell at 8118 = profit target at 8110 profit of $105 Sell at 8124 = profit target at 8114 profit of $135 Sum of Profit/Loss Date Entry Time Long/Short Buy Price Sell Price Setup Total 11:44 AM Short 8110.00 8118.00 Trigger $105.00 8114.00 8124.00 Trigger $135.00 I don't really understand where he got these numbers from, he somehow turns 2 losing trades into two winning trades. Additionally the "buy" price of 8110 was never hit at any time. The low of the 11:51 bar was 8111. The high of the 11:46 bar was 8124, this would have never been filled for a short order as it touched but did not fill a limit order. Maybe I am the only one that cares about this but I am so sick of these people passing themselves off as "experts" when this example clearly shows the BS involved. I would love to invent my buys and sells as it suits me after the market is closed but unfortunately my brokers only takes buys and sells I do REAL time.
  10. I am writing this thread to show a few of my experiences with trading instruction. My hope is to expose some of the questionable activities that are taking place. I will continue my case study for other instruction websites and business I have come across. I will not use real names to protect the guilty. If SoulTrader gives the ok I will give out names but not until then. The first “education” company I want to address is a live chat room where the head instructor Allen, calls real time trades on the E-mini dow (ym) futures contract. In the chat room he has a “buzzer” that sounds when you are supposed to take long or short trades based on Allen’s knowledge of the market. Allen charges $300 a month for his service. On Average Allen calls 7-12 trades during the day. The trader is instructed to “take partial profits at 5-7 points”, Take more profits when the trade moves 11 points on your favor then ride the rest of the position for a bigger winner. In the instruction section of the website Allen tells students to use a stop loss of 20 points. During the trades he will often call out a stop of 50-60 points as a “final” stop. Allen says that he scales into and out of positions because he trades so many contracts. Here is where things get confusing!!!!!!! Some of the trades move 20 or more points against the position from where he says to enter. As the position continues against the traders Allen continues to add contracts making his cost average much lower/higher then the person who just entered on the original call. From here, Allen will be exiting his position before price is even back to the original entry call. Another questionable practice is when Allen makes a call he will sometimes be in immediately and sometimes he will wait for a deeper re-trace before entry. Allen says for the multiple contract trader to enter part of the position at market when he makes the call. Then add onto the position if the market moves against the trader. Undoubtedly this practice of “averaging down” is a way to ensure that the trader will be holding their largest positions when the market is moving against them. Imagine taking 5 ticks profit when market moves in your favor from the entry, but adding 4-5 times that position every 12-20 points as the market moves against you. Here are some transcripts from the room along with the accompanying chart set-ups. The chart we are looking at is the smallest time frame Allen uses and is used to “take entries”. It is an 89 tick chart with a 89 period exponional moving average(green) attached. Also used is a stochastic with the settings of 14,3,3(bottom pane). The price bars are Hekin Ashi bars that measure momentum red bars mean market is bearish and blue bars are bullish. 11:42:14 {Allen} [**] SELL SHORT ALERT. USE STOP MANAGEMENT PER GUIDELINES. TAKE PARTIAL PROFITS WHEN MARKET MOVES 7 POINTS IN YOUR FAVOR. [**] ! ! 11:45:02 {Allen} can add one at 8119 11:46:07 {Allen} [**] SELL SHORT ALERT. USE STOP MANAGEMENT PER GUIDELINES. TAKE PARTIAL PROFITS WHEN MARKET MOVES 7 POINTS IN YOUR FAVOR. [**] ! ! 11:51:01 {Allen} [xx] TARGET HIT - AM i GOOD OR WHAT. CONSIDER EXIT OR TRAIL YOUR STOPS. [XX] ! Lets look at the math behind these series of trades. The original short was called at 11:24 where an entry price of 8099 (give or take a tick) would have been filled. From here at 11:45 Allen says to add on at 11:45 at a price of 8119. Now we are short 2 contracts with an average price of 8109. In order to make +7 we would need market to drop to 8102. Moving along, Allen calls another short at 11:46. It seems we are already short but this is not acknowledged or mentioned. Either we can add another short onto our 2 contracts already or just ignore this signal.(and pray) At 11:51 Allen buzzes Target hit.???????? From the last entry at 11:46 a 7 tick move was seen. However If first trade and ADD ON short were taken the price went no where near the 8102 needed for a profitable trade. Shortly after this trade Allen goes to lunch. And returns at 2:00 to call a couple more trades before then end of the day. I hope all newer traders can appreciate what I am trying to illustrate here. You don't always get what you pay for. Caveat emptor
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.